Started By
Message

re: Will there ever be another true serial killer?

Posted on 3/1/20 at 7:57 am to
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
12804 posts
Posted on 3/1/20 at 7:57 am to
There are probably a hundred out there right now.

Probably at least a few that clicked this thread.
Posted by dchog
Pea Ridge
Member since Nov 2012
27983 posts
Posted on 3/1/20 at 8:34 am to
Who's gonna fill their shoes?

who's gonna fill their shoes
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106097 posts
Posted on 3/1/20 at 8:38 am to
DTL got caught because he targeted college students and middele class women. A serial killer who goes after societal throwaways like prostitutes and transients can get away with it indefinitely. The I35 killer (or killers) in Texas has been at large since the eighties.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
46437 posts
Posted on 3/1/20 at 8:46 am to
It is incredibly difficult to catch a killer that is completely unrelated to the victim. Much of forensic evidence is worthless without a suspect to match.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 3/1/20 at 8:51 am to
As long as prostitution is illegal, there will be plenty of serial killers.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40997 posts
Posted on 3/1/20 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Much of forensic evidence is worthless without a suspect to match.


Hence 23andme etc. That's a serial killers worse nightmare because they can't control their cousin giving a sample.
Posted by Paluka
One State Over
Member since Dec 2010
10763 posts
Posted on 3/1/20 at 9:17 am to
There are serial killers active right now.

Technology does not inhibit their desire to kill and, despite what TV shows, there are tons of unsolved murders. I believe that 40-50% of murders go unsolved nationally.
Posted by A Menace to Sobriety
Member since Jun 2018
32798 posts
Posted on 3/1/20 at 9:22 am to
You make it seem like serial killers can't use technology. While they're all insane, almost all are very smart. I think they can figure it out to their advantage.

This thread is so fricking stupid btw.
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
22082 posts
Posted on 3/1/20 at 9:31 am to
I feel like what you’re getting at is that a serial killer may not get the same level of notoriety of the ones mentioned in the OP, and I think you might be right. It seems like the national media has made a concerted effort to not sensationalize recent serial killers as they have done in the past. Same goes for mass shooters.

However there are definitely still serial killers killing.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19806 posts
Posted on 3/1/20 at 9:32 am to
Serial type killers still exist, but the thing is that I doubt we'll see very many with kill counts like Bundy, Golden State Killer or Green River Killer. It's way too hard to get away with it for the following reasons:

1) DNA has advanced so much that they can pull DNA from almost anything, even surfaces the suspect merely touched. In the early days of DNA, you needed large blood or semen samples, etc. Now even skin cells can be used.

2) Crime databases. These computerized databases didn't exist in the old days. Now all police departments are interconnected and communicate. It is hard to pull of a crime in one state then move to another and continue your spree. Cops are doing a much better job connecting killings across states thanks to the internet. Also suspects can't skip town and expect to go unnoticed in another state if they turn up there. In the old days you could be wanted for murder in one state, get arrested in another, and get out on bail before they realized you're wanted for murder. That type of thing never happens now. Even police in BFE Louisiana have immediate access to who's wanted in NYC for instance.

3) Surveillance. In the old days cameras were rare or didn't exist at all (maybe banks had them and that was it). Nowadays you can't go anywhere without being on tape in a dozen places. Makes it much easier for police to monitor a crime scene or dump site for possible suspects and suspect vehicles. And with computerized databases, makes it much easier (and faster) for them to match up a vehicle with a person.

4) Cell phones. Makes it easier for a victim to be tracked. Even if the killer takes the phone away immediately, well the police still know exactly when and where the victim was kidnapped (by pinging the towers) which will help greatly with piecing things together. There's also a good chance another citizen might see something suspicious and get it on camera. Everyone has a 4k camera in his pocket.

5) Genealogy databases. These are the new thing. Numerous high profile murders have been solved in the past couple years using this technique (the big one was the Golden State Killer/Original Nightstalker). Even if the killer never submits his DNA to a genealogy company, chances are someone in his family has. And if they have, the killer is almost certainly busted. DNA has advanced to the point where they can match a killer's profile to a relative and tell how far removed that relative is (cousin, etc.) If you know who the killer's cousins or uncles are, it's easy to find the killer.

Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
12219 posts
Posted on 3/1/20 at 9:53 am to
I would have agreed but for a current missing child. A little girl, less than two years old was last seen by someone outside of her family Dec.10 or 11. She wasn't reported missing until mid February.

With all the surveillance equipment out there, she remains disappeared.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram