Started By
Message

re: Will Smith Murder Trial-Guilty of manslaughter and attempted manslaughter

Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:31 am to
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:31 am to
You motherfrickers are insufferable.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111885 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:31 am to
quote:

I'd understand the safety off if he was carrying it at the time of the shooting.
I carry around condition 1 if the gun does have an external safety. So i dont find it odd the safety was on
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:32 am to
Neither my Gock .40 or my Glock 9mm have safety's. Any idea what kind of gun Smith had?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89277 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:33 am to
quote:

So i dont find it odd the safety was on
So you agree with my original premise then. Thanks.
Posted by djangochained
Gardere
Member since Jul 2013
19169 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:33 am to
So about the trial??
Posted by TigahJay
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2015
11402 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:33 am to
quote:

But not the first one. Like I said, you can't read.

You are flat out wrong but you won't admit so now I can't read. Tell me more. People like you give Jesuit a bad name.
Posted by BrotherEsau
Member since Aug 2011
3600 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:33 am to
You said that on one hand that no one (who is well trained) takes off the safety until ready to fire, then said that condition zero is cocked and locked, which it is not, and are now trying to say that lots of people carry in condition zero, which means safety off. Contradict yourself much?

Posted by djangochained
Gardere
Member since Jul 2013
19169 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:34 am to
Both your glocks do have a retard holding on to them
Posted by BrotherEsau
Member since Aug 2011
3600 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:34 am to
quote:

I just don;'t see why you'd expect him to keep the safety on when he's putting it up for a few hours. I'd understand the safety off if he was carrying it at the time of the shooting.


All of my guns are stored with the safety on, if there is one. Not unusual at all.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111885 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:34 am to
quote:

So you agree with my original premise then. Thanks.
Yes.

But you were still wrong as frick and are too weak to admit it
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89277 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Neither my Gock .40 or my Glock 9mm have EXTERNAL safety's


They have 3 safety mechanisms though
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Both your glocks do have a retard holding on to them



English please
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111885 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:36 am to
quote:

You said that on one hand that no one (who is well trained) takes off the safety until ready to fire,
frick you. I did not. that was lnch
quote:

then said that condition zero is cocked and locked, which it is not,
And then later clarified the difference between 1 and 0
quote:

trying to say that lots of people carry in condition zero, which means safety off
always my original statement frickface
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89277 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:36 am to
quote:

But you were still wrong as frick and are too weak to admit it



Literally said I don't know everything the second you prompted me to. Still have never seen you admit to any shortcomings you've had in this thread. You're still a hypocrite.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111885 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Literally said I don't know everything the second you prompted me to. Still have never seen you admit to any shortcomings you've had in this thread. You're still a hypocrite.
I have called myself a dumbass multiple times. My personna is I come in blazing, shoot from the hip type of poster


You are the poster that thinks they shite roses
This post was edited on 12/9/16 at 9:38 am
Posted by kbdos
Uptown
Member since Oct 2005
2062 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:37 am to
Coroner showing on ada Napoli where bullets hit smith
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89277 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:37 am to
quote:

ou are flat out wrong but you won't admit so now I can't read.


Go read my first post to Gyno. Then get back to me with your pompous attitude.

Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89277 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:38 am to
quote:

You are the poster that thinks they shite roses



Not true at all.

And calling yourself a dumbass isn't you ever admitting being wrong. We did this like 30 pages ago and you said what you do is somehow different from what i do.
This post was edited on 12/9/16 at 9:39 am
Posted by kbdos
Uptown
Member since Oct 2005
2062 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:38 am to
Ceravolo is in the building. Maybe testifying today
Posted by BrotherEsau
Member since Aug 2011
3600 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Any idea what kind of gun Smith had?


I don't recall they've ever said. You can get some 1911's w 10 rd mags, though most with the greater than 7 or 8 capacity are double action. The Springfield XDS is single action, but not sure if it has an external safety other than the grip safety. The glocks and other DA only do not usually have external safety.

I find with rare exception, reporters don't know shite about guns, thus get a lot wrong.
Jump to page
Page First 127 128 129 130 131 ... 248
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 129 of 248Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram