Started By
Message

re: Why wouldn’t network TV want as many viewers as possible?

Posted on 11/24/19 at 11:29 pm to
Posted by weadjust
Member since Aug 2012
15817 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

Cable and satellite providers pay the locals a set fee for each subscriber ($2 or so)


Way less than $2 a month for locals. The only channels getting more than $1 a month per subscriber are ESPN, Fox Sports, and NFL Network.
Posted by LSUJay13
South Louisiana
Member since May 2008
543 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

Way less than $2 a month for locals. The only channels getting more than $1 a month per subscriber are ESPN, Fox Sports, and NFL Network.



But you get the point right?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29134 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

Way less than $2 a month for locals.
I believe it is actually more than $2/month for each local in many regions.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29134 posts
Posted on 11/25/19 at 12:28 am to
quote:

The only channels getting more than $1 a month per subscriber are ESPN, Fox Sports, and NFL Network.
Actually all of your information seems to be at least 5 years outdated, because even 2 years ago there were several more cable channels charging more than $1/sub.

The Disney Channel was at $1.61 in 2017, probably approaching $2 by now if not already past. Fox News was at $1.55, likely over $2 by now. USA is over $1, as is TBS. CNN is approaching $1, and TNT is over $2. And of course the ones you mentioned, FS1 was at $1.30, and ESPN is well over $8 by now. Even ESPN2 is over $1, and SECN is likely approaching $1 if it isn't more already.

As for the locals, these media companies keep buying them up to increase their negotiating power. These are billion dollar companies in their own right, and several of them own dozens to hundreds of local stations. Every year these retransmission contracts are up for renewal, and the fees keep jumping by huge amounts in the range of 20% on up to doubling or more. The number of station blackouts keeps growing, but they know the cable/satellite/streaming companies eventually have to cave because they have to keep their own customers.
Posted by millerf43
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2019
460 posts
Posted on 11/25/19 at 1:41 am to
The internet feed is operated by your cable provider not the national network. If you live outside of new york or LA, a local station is broadcasting the signal. The local broadcast company has a contract with national network. The local broadcast company also feed your cable service with programing. As part of the contract, the local affiliate generates revenue selling local ad time.

I have no idea how the contract between national network, local affiliate, and cable company works. I do know if a local business buys ad time from a local affiliate, the local business owner wants to know demographic information about the audience he/she is reaching.

In other words, it's not that the don't want as many viewers as possible. They just have to account for all the viewers.
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
17793 posts
Posted on 11/25/19 at 4:53 am to
quote:

I’m just questioning why an industry that lives and dies by ratings and ad revenue would limit access.


They aren’t. You can get their content through an antenna, cable provider or stream online. How many more options do you want?
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13974 posts
Posted on 11/25/19 at 8:26 am to
Local stations spent a lot of money on broadcast towers. Use them.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram