Started By
Message

re: Why no WW1 love from hollywood?

Posted on 8/6/17 at 5:06 pm to
Posted by Kcarp
Member since Jun 2004
18885 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 5:06 pm to
I didn't read all the comments, however I thought this movie explained WW1 to me.
quote:

The Lost Battalion


LINK
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 5:11 pm to
Well yeah.









Obviously.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
55153 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 5:12 pm to
Yes, I know about Dawn Patrol but that was released in 1934!

We need something new with more historical detail and realism.

But imagine an evening with young Ursula Andress and a bottle of Champagne.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 5:17 pm to
The OP answered his own question I think:

quote:

I've never really paid much attention to WW1


Why make a film about the Great War (which hardly anyone knows much about in the US) when they can make movies about wars people know about?

It's too bad though, agreed. Hardly anyone knows about the second Scharnhorst and Gneisenau (WW2), let alone the first (WW1).

Or all the valves and wheels it took to operate a submarine back then. LINK
Posted by CSATiger
The Battlefield
Member since Aug 2010
6905 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

I'll add All's Quiet on the Western Front


Yes, be sure to get the original with Lew Ayres, not the remake with Richard Thomas
Posted by The Levee
Bat Country
Member since Feb 2006
11757 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 6:42 pm to
Because all we are taught in school is

Slavery

Civil War

Trail of tears

Holocaust

Martin Luther King


Liberal agenda put into our class curriculum. So basically, if it's history and it doesn't make your heart bleed, they don't focus on it.

How would Hollywood make someone the poor victim of the white devil on ww1?
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31522 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 6:45 pm to
You went to crappy schools then
This post was edited on 8/6/17 at 6:46 pm
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

It was trench warfare with very long wait periods for battle,


This was the same place where "residual" KIA numbered in the tens of thousands per week without major battles.

During battles there were hundreds of thousands KIA per day.

It was the first mechanical meat grinder war, where human flesh was the collateral.

quote:

Hollywood was right not to make a huge deal about it such as WWII that changed ALL life in the US


This is just ignorant. WWI ended imperial Europe as a whole. The Ottoman empire collapsing is arguably the greatest single calamity of the 20th century. Without that happening you dont see Israel, Jordan, Syria, Turkey, Iraq or Egypt as separate entities, and you still have a peaceful middle east. In addition the US never enters Iraq, or the middle east. Arguably 9/11 never happens either.
Posted by The Levee
Bat Country
Member since Feb 2006
11757 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 6:49 pm to
Just talked to a Newman parent about it. So if Newman is shitty.

I know we spent about 3 minutes on ww1at my High school.

Where did you go?
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 6:49 pm to
There's a great movie to be made about Frank Luke, the famous 'balloon buster' of WW1.
Posted by Count Spatula
Da House
Member since Jul 2017
51 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 7:01 pm to
quote:


I know we spent about 3 minutes on ww1at my High school.


I remember that every history class I took in jr high/high school was the same. The teacher would move too slow throughout the year, then frantically try to cover the 20th century in the last 2 weeks.
This post was edited on 8/6/17 at 7:02 pm
Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

I'm currently watching the docu-series "the first world war" on Amazon. I've never really paid much attention to WW1, probably because I've been bombarded with WW2 stuff my whole life. Why do you think Hollywood doesn't pay much attention to WW1? The stuff that went on during this war was absolutely nuts.




It was the first time that Country's who had been winning wars against lesser warriors, First met the enemy who was equal and their charges became nothing but huge blood baths with no quick way to end the misery.

Shell Shock (PTSD) was at 21%

I do not know how they did it
This post was edited on 8/6/17 at 7:13 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 7:12 pm to
Because the trenches suck and the Nazis and Japanese are far more compelling villains than the ones in WWI. I mean, were there villains in WWI?
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74207 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 7:14 pm to
Biggest movie of the year was set in ww1.
Posted by JamalSanders
On a boat
Member since Jul 2015
12222 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 7:15 pm to
Because trench warfare is boring.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

Hell, the middle east, Africa etc saw very little trench warfare. And the eastern front saw very limited trench warfare.


Well, if you make it from this front then you have to compete with debatably the greatest movie of all time Lawrence of Arabia, so it has that going against it.
Posted by cjared036
Houston, tx
Member since Dec 2009
9569 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 7:22 pm to
the NAZIs were right out of central casting.

The Nazi uniform director deserves an Oscar. They had legit uniforms that screamed villain.

Take away the killings and the Halocaust, it was life imitating art.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

The Nazi uniform director deserves an Oscar.


Hugo Boss?
Posted by Amazing Moves
Member since Jan 2014
6174 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 8:34 pm to
Posted by csorre1
Member since Apr 2010
7237 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Just talked to a Newman parent about it. So if Newman is shitty.


Not sure who you talked to but that's entirely inaccurate.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram