- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why does Juban Crossing look so different from its initial plan?
Posted on 10/22/15 at 3:01 pm to Paul Allen
Posted on 10/22/15 at 3:01 pm to Paul Allen
The concept always looked way too fancy for Denham. I just figured at some point they smartened up and remembered they were building something in Denham and realized that it didn't have to look nice to attract the locals. They're still impressed by any kind of development.
Posted on 10/22/15 at 4:19 pm to xLxSxUxFxAxNx
quote:
adding a movie theater (one that servers food and alcohol), stroubies, and a walk ons
Adding a walk ons will really class up the joint. How about hiring cashiers at the Rouses that have all of their teeth being step one?
Posted on 10/22/15 at 4:35 pm to Martini
AP would love to 4-lane their roads, but they're all state highways that have been sitting in that $12 billion backlog DOTD has since the early 90's. The left turn lane for Nicholson at Brightside is right in front of us in line 
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:01 pm to MandevilleLSUTiger
Economical factors?? That's so 2007. The economy is better now, so why won't they comeback and build these higher stores now?
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:02 pm to Paul Allen
It looks like a fricking dump.
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:16 pm to Jake88
I do not know why anyone believes developers. Just look at any golf development or "next river ranch" development.
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:47 pm to Paul Allen
Usually its because of the bait and switch but I think in this case it was mostly because they originally were going to use a lot more tax dollars for the project. The local state representative from Livingston Parish disagreed with Bobby Jindal on something so of course the Governor punished the representative by rejecting the legislation that created the funding mechanism.
on a philosophical level, I don't think it was a good idea anyway to use public funds.
on a philosophical level, I don't think it was a good idea anyway to use public funds.
This post was edited on 10/22/15 at 8:54 pm
Popular
Back to top

0





