Started By
Message

re: Why do people think electric cars are somehow better for the environment?

Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:20 pm to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
69391 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Level 1 car charger consumption is about the same as a single space heater. Level 2 is about like adding another water heater and window AC unit. Again...most will be charging at night when most other appliances are not in use. It isn't insignificant...but it also isn't like running a 220V range on high during the middle of the day, either.



Only problem with this is the size of current electric cars. Namely that they’re all barley big enough to be considered mid-sized. If we’re going to go all electric, then we’re going to have to produce a shite ton of bigger vehicles. As of 2012 there were 133 million trucks of all sizes in the US. I dare say that to replace those with electric trucks, the charging requirements would dwarf what’s required to charge a glorified golf cart.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

They're only cheaper if you ignore the ~$10,000 cost premium at acquisition
is that a made up number?

quote:

Let's not forget acquisition cost is the first cost of ownership
True for EV and non-EV cars.

quote:

nor ignore the real cost of charging it in your garage (retrofit to accommodate charging plus significantly higher electric bills)
This is false, they are certainly not "significantly" higher, especially when compared to the cost of getting gas in your car weekly, and you can also charge during non-peak hours and save a decent bit this way. if you're also not planning to use it much, maybe just a daily commute, you can charge as needed, thus saving even more.

quote:

At less than $2 a gallon, gas powered is cheaper and remains cheaper
Cheaper than what? You're throwing out what seems like a lot of made up numbers, I'd love to see you show your work on these figures.

Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
20947 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Only problem with this is the size of current electric cars. Namely that they’re all barley big enough to be considered mid-sized. If we’re going to go all electric, then we’re going to have to produce a shite ton of bigger vehicles. As of 2012 there were 133 million trucks of all sizes in the US. I dare say that to replace those with electric trucks, the charging requirements would dwarf what’s required to charge a glorified golf cart.



How about a high-powered hybrid.

Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
69391 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:33 pm to
I just looked it up and according to howstuffworks.com, the Lithium-ion battery in the Tesla Roadster is projected to have a lifespan of 5 years or 100,000 miles. At that time the battery will need to be replaced at a cost of $10,000.

LINK
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
20947 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

I just looked it up and according to howstuffworks.com, the Lithium-ion battery in the Tesla Roadster is projected to have a lifespan of 5 years or 100,000 miles. At that time the battery will need to be replaced at a cost of $10,000.



I just looked it up...Tesla batteries are currently showing 90% storage retention after 160,000 miles, and could last for 500,000.

LINK
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:41 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/21/20 at 9:17 am
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

I just looked it up and according to howstuffworks.com, the Lithium-ion battery in the Tesla Roadster is projected to have a lifespan of 5 years or 100,000 miles. At that time the battery will need to be replaced at a cost of $10,000.
Did you think to check the date on the sources from your link?


Hint, it's 2001-2008 sources.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

I just looked it up...Tesla batteries are currently showing 90% storage retention after 160,000 miles, and could last for 500,000.
The best part about your link in reply to Darth's post is the very 1st line of your link:

quote:

Way back at the dawn of the electric car era — about 10 years ago now — the knock on electric cars was that their batteries wouldn’t last 100,000 miles
Exactly what Darth said, you couldn't have possibly found a better link to reply to him.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
69391 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

FYI that article is for a 2009 Tesla Roadster. There are already plenty of Model S cars with greater than 100,000 miles on the original batteries. And even at that point, the batteries still work, just not as well. With the pace of technology, I imagine 200,000 miles is very possible. And just like that, you're already on par with most gasoline engines


Wait. So you’re telling me that you think it’s a good deal to buy a car that you know at 200,000 miles you’re going to have to either park it or fork out $10,000?!?

Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
28606 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

I dare say that to replace those with electric trucks, the charging requirements would dwarf what’s required to charge a glorified golf cart.


Have you actually done any calculations or found any sources that support DWARF. The average pickup driving around town doesn't have energy requirements that DWARF cars.

If you make up your mind then look for anecdotal "facts" to support it you can almost always do it.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
69391 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Have you actually done any calculations or found any sources that support DWARF. The average pickup driving around town doesn't have energy requirements that DWARF cars.

If you make up your mind then look for anecdotal "facts" to support it you can almost always do it.


I’m talking not just pickup trucks, but also big trucks like everything from dump trucks to long haul 18 wheelers.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
28606 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Wait. So you’re telling me that you think it’s a good deal to buy a car that you know at 200,000 miles you’re going to have to either park it or fork out $10,000?!?




Did you read further? Battery output is 90% at 160k and expected to drop to around 80% at 500k. Don't get hooked on old sources.
Posted by Bullfrog
Running Through the Wet Grass
Member since Jul 2010
59218 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:50 pm to
I think my dad’s Tesla runs him $6-7$ to completely charge the battery at home. When he travels, it’s free charging everywhere he’s been.

I want to say it’s a 300 mile range per charge unless you like to floor it and feel the G forces.
This post was edited on 1/14/19 at 1:51 pm
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
28606 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

I’m talking not just pickup trucks, but also big trucks like everything from dump trucks to long haul 18 wheelers.


Well then make your point, the numbers should be easy enough to calculate.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Wait. So you’re telling me that you think it’s a good deal to buy a car that you know at 200,000 miles you’re going to have to either park it or fork out $10,000?!?

So you're just not going to comment at all on the fact that you linked an article with info that was 10-18 years old and tried to pass it off as modern day fact, huh?

But to answer your question since I'm sure you'll dodge the above, yes I'd consider it a good deal since I know I'd never get anywhere near 200k miles, so that would be irrelevant to me.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Did you read further? Battery output is 90% at 160k and expected to drop to around 80% at 500k. Don't get hooked on old sources.

He's still going off of 15 year old info.
This post was edited on 1/14/19 at 1:52 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
69391 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:56 pm to
And another question, why are we gonna do with all these batteries when they’ve reached the end of their life?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

And another question, why are we gonna do with all these batteries when they’ve reached the end of their life?

Should we see what the plan was 15 years ago to dispose of them and go with that as fact in 2019?
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
69391 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:58 pm to
And what do you think goes into making all these batteries? Where do they come from?
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
14192 posts
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:58 pm to
BMW says electric cars will always be more expensive than gas, FWIW....The cost of the batteries will be steep.

LINK

Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram