re: Why Do Many Famous Musicians Get a Pass For Pedophilia?

Posted by CptRusty

Basket of Deplorables

Member since Aug 2011

11740 posts

Posted on 7/28/19 at 1:21 pm to Bigfishchoupique

quote:
Y’all sound like a bunch of hysterical SJW ‘s. Pedophilia is an attraction to pre - pubescent children. That means before they are capable of reproduction. ( before puberty). Attraction to underage post pubescent females does not pass the test for pedophilia. Is it wrong?Of course. Pedophilia is not defined by your emotions or beliefs. The word is as over and misused as the word “ racism” is.

Yea I don't give a shite about any of that. If you frick a 13 year old, I'm just gonna call you a pedophile. Distinction without a difference, as they say.

Posted by SEClint

New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR

Member since Nov 2006

49487 posts

Posted on 7/28/19 at 1:22 pm to BowlJackson

quote:
Jerry Lee Lewis too. He married his 13 yr old cousin

Losing white hot career isnt a pass

Posted by Obi-Wan Tiger

Fulshear TX

Member since Jan 2004

8893 posts

Posted on 7/28/19 at 2:02 pm to FightnBobLafollette

quote:
He was put on the sex registry list for 5 years.

What for then? It was reported that he admitted to using his credit card to access those sites.

This post was edited on 7/28/19 at 2:17 pm

Posted by TexasTiger08

Member since Oct 2006

30569 posts

Posted on 7/28/19 at 2:18 pm to NYCAuburn

Society is quick to condemn athletes who do this stuff. Hell, look at Luke Heimlich. And there is some speculation into that situation. Movie stars get the same tar and feather treatment. These people SHOULD be exposed.

For some reason, calling out a great musician for this behavior only results in, ‘but their music was so great!’, and it’s sad. I’ve had these discussions before.

I’m realizing music groupies may be on a lower functioning level than sports and actor groupies.

Posted by FightnBobLafollette

Member since Oct 2017

12204 posts

Posted on 7/28/19 at 2:19 pm to Obi-Wan Tiger

quote:
What for then?

For accessing a site that contained child abuse images. NOT SITES.

Did it in 99. The investigation was in 2003, not just him. He was found to have accessed for a day. Nothing on his computer.

Put on registry.

This post was edited on 7/28/19 at 2:20 pm

Posted by chRxis

None of your fricking business

Member since Feb 2008

28262 posts

Posted on 7/28/19 at 2:26 pm to NYCAuburn

i've seen some very attractive girls that are 15-16, but once i'm made aware of their age, i don't find them the same sort of "attractive" as before... they are still very pretty, in my eyes, but that knowledge just makes it different, IMO... at least for me it does....

younger girls don't really do much for me anyway...

Posted by Knownothing

Member since Jul 2019

155 posts

Posted on 7/28/19 at 2:36 pm to FightnBobLafollette

quote:
For accessing a site that contained child abuse images. NOT SITES.

What do you mean by access and how many sites does someone need to access before you say "whoa"?

Posted by FightnBobLafollette

Member since Oct 2017

12204 posts

Posted on 7/28/19 at 2:50 pm to Knownothing

quote:
What do you mean by access and how many sites does someone need to access before you say "whoa"?

He paid to join. Then cancelled.

When you educate yourself on the specifics then we can move further.

Posted by Knownothing

Member since Jul 2019

155 posts

Posted on 7/28/19 at 2:55 pm to FightnBobLafollette

quote:
When you educate yourself on the specifics then we can move further.

No thanks. I don't like learning/discussing things with passive aggressive people.

I asked one question in the whole thread and you got snotty. I honestly don't that care much, so have a great day!

Posted by FightnBobLafollette

Member since Oct 2017

12204 posts

Posted on 7/28/19 at 3:07 pm to Knownothing

quote:
thanks. I don't like learning/discussing things with passive aggressive people.

Holy irony.

quote:
honestly don't that care much, so have a great day!

Your reaction says the opposite.