Favorite team:TBD
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:155
Registered on:7/1/2019
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

cubsfan5150 I'm not sure that I've heard the guys voice once since he left his daily espn show


Maybe you have a age gap. He hasn't been on traditional media aka radio, cable TV as much but he has made a presence on non-traditional media since leaving ESPN
quote:

country is doing great. We just have a shitty media and a-holes on Twitter stirring shite constantly.


Jesus Christ. Learn to embrace fun and sarcasm.
quote:

Posted by AuburnTigers

Just think, if they were real and had exploded, this world would be a safer place to live


If you're going to talk about killing people to make the world a better place, be a man and put your name on it.
quote:

Dafuq?


Here is the issue. Standers know about sitters but sitters never can imagine standers exist.
quote:

It's simply a list of rampage killings. That's it. It won't brainwash you. LINK


I don't see Sandy Hook on that list. Why did they leave that one out?
quote:

Topwater Trout

quote: he murdered a guy..

according to who?


According to the guy who whose post you’re replying to.

He’s obviously wrong but stop being passive aggressive you gosh darn coward.
I hate "Change my mind" threads/people
quote:

No, he wasn’t lying. If charges are not pressed, you aren’t arrested. He may have been detained but that’s not an arrest.


Do we believe the story to be true is my main question.

I'm kind of 50/50 that BRPD leaned on an officer to say he put his hands on the ex or that he actually did it

Has nothing to do with the finding regarding Sterling, but it would influence my opinion on if he should be a LEO in general.
Did he actually lie on during the hiring process?

Seems iffy to me.
So a guy reported seeing another guy who claimed to have seen Bigfoot?

Wow old and drunk on a Wednesday night. Not a good combination.
quote:

I dont know


Perfectly acceptable answer. Not sure why you needed to take a Hardline in the sand on this issue prior to this post.
quote:

Look at it separately...did he lie because his actions were intentional or did he lie because he realized in hindsight he screwed up?


Yes or no, this officer should face criminal charges from his actions that night, whether it is the lying or the actual shooting?
I don't know why you are responding to my one post twice.

Have a good night.
quote:

Ok...what is his training? And how did he violate it?


My friend I ain't quoting chapter and verse to you on the internet for a police training manual neither one of us are experts in.

If you are not interested in admitting this officer might have some legal problems from this situation, that he may or may not get out of, then take your hard line in the sand and have a good night.
quote:

acting reckless and unreasonable. That is the burden for criminal negligence.


Violating his training seems reckless and unreasonable imo. At the very least if seems like a question for a jury at the least.
quote:

If he genuinely thought he was reasonably defending himself or others he is not criminally negligent


If his actions violate the training he received and other norms for police officers, doesn't that make his actions unreasonable?