Started By
Message

re: What would the economic impact be if all student loans were forgiven?

Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:40 am to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138068 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:40 am to
quote:

It's criminal to give 18yr olds the ability to get into debt that will take them 20 years to pay off. But damn near anything the govt does for wealth distribution is criminal anyway. But the Karens of the world will tell you it's perfectly acceptable to go $200,000 in debt just to end up with some liberal arts degree.

If you force these universities to be on the hook for 50-70% of these loans, you'd see prices and waste plummet overnight.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25094 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:40 am to
quote:

but every dollar owed is a dollar on a lender’s balance sheet. If that balance is wiped clean, those lenders will likely collapse
Most student loans are federally guaranteed. So if the government forgives the loans, the government is writing checks to the banks for the loan balances. Lenders won't collapse over it. But its still terrible policy that's going to have to be paid for with tax increases on those of us who had jobs in college and paid for our expenses instead of partying all the time and using student loans as a means to live off of for 4+ years.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21101 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Old Testament, real wrath of God type stuff. Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling! Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes... The dead rising from the grave! Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!


Posted by The Midnight Rider
Where the River Empties
Member since May 2015
1576 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Starbucks would collapse because all their workers would be able to pursue their dreams of an interpretive dance about the atrocities of American colonialism.

Someone doesn’t know jack shite about Starbucks and how beneficial their corporate policies actually are.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:44 am to
quote:

The people who already paid them off would have a fit, and demand tax breaks on those amounts.


Denied.

Now back to work, comrade.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138068 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Someone doesn’t know jack shite about Starbucks and how beneficial their corporate policies actually are.


You obviously don't understand the importance of interpretive dance, amigo
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Massive inflation


would be ~1/20 of the injected capital we just printed for the stimulus

the real issue is it doesn’t address the problem, just the symptom. The problem is that banks have no risk when giving out student loans because they are insured by the federal government; and colleges know this and take advantage by upping tuition that is paid for by the banks.

Stop the government insurance of the loans, and this crisis will drop in scale dramatically.

It’s kind of like anything the government touches turns to arse.
Posted by Stiles
Member since Sep 2017
3454 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:49 am to
quote:

The people who already paid them off would have a fit, and demand tax breaks on those amounts

More than reasonable considering taxes are what’s going to have to pay for the forgiven loans.
Nothing is free.
Posted by hob
Member since Dec 2017
2342 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:50 am to
quote:

But wouldn’t be upset at having $1200 a month to invest in the economy instead of going to the guvment




I'd rather invest $1200 a month in the economy rather than give it to the government so that they could pay off other peoples loans.

Posted by TravisTigerTravis
Lake Travis
Member since Nov 2020
356 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Pretty spot on. The boomers who paid 1200 a year for a general studies degree in the LBJ administration won’t like it. But it’s true. College should not be free but it should be more affordable, especially now when A more specialized job market virtually demands graduate degrees.Starting with predatory interest rates.



College is expensive because higher ed, big banks and government are all in bed together.

Higher ed knows that any idiot out there can get a federal student loan, so higher ed therefore charges more money for tuition. It's a never ending cycle.

Getting the government out of the student loan business would drop tuition prices overnight
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295592 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:52 am to
quote:

The boomers who paid 1200 a year for a general studies degree in the LBJ administration won’t like it.


Ohh..angry little gnome..

Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138068 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:52 am to
quote:

More than reasonable considering taxes are what’s going to have to pay for the forgiven loans.
Nothing is free.

Exactly. Not only did I have to pay off loans on a massively overpriced product, but I will now have to pay off someone else's education that will be 10x more inflated than what I paid now that there will be essentially an open floodgate on spending at these universities
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25094 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:53 am to
quote:

The problem is that banks have no risk when giving out student loans because they are insured by the federal government
Which is why the banks will let someone run up $100K+ in student loans while majoring in some bullshite degree field that doesn't have any more earning potential than just a high school diploma. The bank wouldn't loan me $100K to buy a Tacoma or $500K to buy a house that was only worth $200K. Same logic should apply to student loans but won't until the government stops guaranteeing the loans.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295592 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Lenders won't collapse over it


People under the age of 50 will be saddled with tax increases and rconomic hardships in the future.

Nothing is free. Pay now or later.
Posted by tigergirl10
Member since Jul 2019
10675 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 11:58 am to
It’s not gonna happen, I’d imagine the responsible people who worked hard to already pay theirs off would riot
Posted by iron banks
Destrehan
Member since Jul 2014
4174 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 12:10 pm to
Slow Joe just ushered in the final leg of American idiocrazy
Posted by GentleJackJones
Member since Mar 2019
4891 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 12:26 pm to
The government bailed out the banks in '08, why won't it bail out its citizens?

Basically, the economic impact would be that citizens with federal student loans will have more money in their pockets. That means more money to invest, purchase, and stimulate the economy.

I think it would be a good thing, honestly. And I, fortunately, didn't have any student debt.
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 12:29 pm to
Damn glad never had one of those
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Not sure. But wouldn’t be upset at having $1200 a month to invest in the economy instead of going to the guvment


That’s a good bit baw
Lol
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295592 posts
Posted on 11/13/20 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

The government bailed out the banks in '08, why won't it bail out its citizens?


This post was edited on 11/13/20 at 12:43 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram