Started By
Message

re: what is the 1st year of Millenneals?

Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:26 am to
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41887 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:26 am to
quote:

I'd put the first year as 1992.

By the time you could think on your own, the Internet was already an established thing.



that would be generation Z

Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84349 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:28 am to
I'm 32 and I know I'm on the cusp of Generation X and Millenial, depending where you put the cutoff.
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
98740 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:30 am to
You're welcome to have an option on it. Just know that it's wrong

The generally accepted cutoff is around 1980. I'm on the border at 79
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:31 am to
3 more years until people born in 2000 are in college!
Posted by logjamming
Member since Feb 2014
8313 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:33 am to
Not sure. But I like to think anyone that was young enough to join Facebook without a college email is a POS millennial
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89480 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:35 am to
quote:

You're welcome to have an option on it. Just know that it's wrong



how am I wrong? To quote sabi

quote:

There are no precise dates when the generation starts and ends; most researchers and commentators use birth years ranging from the early 1980s to the early 2000s.


That's a pretty fricking wide range of years. What is your source that clearly and definitively defines the generational cutoffs?

quote:

The generally accepted cutoff is around 1980.




Sorry, but nothing about a THIRTY SIX year old fits in with the millennial generation.
Posted by Salamander_Wilson
Member since Jul 2015
8263 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:37 am to
I also think one rule of being a millennial should be how 9/11 affected you. If it was some vague memory about something bad happening or no memory at all, you are a millennial. If you were old enough for it to completely alter your way of thinking moving forward, you are not.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89480 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:38 am to
quote:

how 9/11 affected you. If it was some vague memory about something bad happening or no memory at all, you are a millennial. If you were old enough for it to completely alter your way of thinking moving forward, you are not.


according to fin's sources, you could have been a junior in college when it happened and still be a millennial.
Posted by ThatMakesSense
Fort Lauderdale
Member since Aug 2015
15281 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:40 am to
quote:

I also think one rule of being a millennial should be how 9/11 affected you. If it was some vague memory about something bad happening or no memory at all, you are a millennial. If you were old enough for it to completely alter your way of thinking moving forward, you are not.


What if you were in a coma?
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
98740 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:41 am to
Your quote says it begins in the early 80s. I don't need my own since yours agrees with me
You milenneals are pretty dense
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84349 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Early 1980's to the early 2000's


quote:

That's a pretty fricking wide range of years. What is your source that clearly and definitively defines the generational cutoffs?


...it's a generation.

Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89480 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:44 am to
quote:

Your quote says it begins in the early 80s. I don't need my own since yours agrees with me


Not "my" quote, I just copied what sabi said.

Also, you said

quote:

You're welcome to have an option on it. Just know that it's wrong

The generally accepted cutoff is around 1980


So, you say that that quote from earlier stands alone and you agree with it, since it agrees with your stance...yet it also says there is no defined year and could stretch all the way to 2000. So, it agrees with me too huh?



Posted by eScott
Member since Oct 2008
11376 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:45 am to
I might start hanging out at Cadillac café, I'm getting tired of dating millenneals
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89480 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:46 am to
quote:

..it's a generation.




Yeah, I guess it is. Hey it's still early.
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
98740 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:47 am to
I'm out

This is like arguing with my 6 year old
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89480 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:48 am to
quote:

This is like arguing with my 6 year old


Sorry I don't think 36 year olds are millennials. If that makes me an idiot oh well.
Posted by Elephino
2nd floor, stall 3. Bring paper
Member since Sep 2008
521 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:53 am to
You can disagree with the values of a generation and still be part of said generation. Fin is correct and you can source any number of research articles. Precise cut-off are difficult to quantify, but Gen X is generally considered to have spanned 1965-1980. Gen Y is considered to have spanned 1981-2000. Gen Z is 2001-. Most sources place an asterisk for the start and end years, but the ideologys shift was more than apparent by the year specified.
This post was edited on 1/16/16 at 8:54 am
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
77900 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:53 am to
That's a good one.
Posted by ThatMakesSense
Fort Lauderdale
Member since Aug 2015
15281 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 8:54 am to
The 36 yr olds, that dress as 20somethings, most certainly are.
This post was edited on 1/16/16 at 8:55 am
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
70797 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 9:03 am to
I'm January of 81. Was also raised by older parents born in the early 40s,so I do not really feel anything similar to the millennial group even though some have early 80s included in group. Didn't log on to the Internet until I was at lsu in 1999 (asl?). I'd say my brother born in 85 is the same way.
This post was edited on 1/16/16 at 9:11 am
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram