- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Well, the usual lying begins. Webb telescope.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:09 pm to IAmNERD
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:09 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
"Not impactful" and significant damage" do not add up.
Maybe read words in their context?
quote:
"significant uncorrectable change" to segment C3
quote:
not especially impactful on how the telescope as a whole
One phrase applies to segment C3, which is not critical to the telescope as a whole
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:11 pm to Geekboy
So, no more photos from webb?
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:13 pm to Geekboy
When it comes to conspiracy theories, I question things and there are a lot of things I can come up with theories for, other than what has been reported, but I don't just automatically believe something else because it could make sense.
But I guess since you say its the usual lying then its the usual lying. And its an absolute fact.
Why not word it like "this happened and I think there is a chance this could be ________. What are your thoughts?" then people can have a more semi-educated discussion.. Instead you come in hot "WELL THEY LYING AGAIN!
But I guess since you say its the usual lying then its the usual lying. And its an absolute fact.
Why not word it like "this happened and I think there is a chance this could be ________. What are your thoughts?" then people can have a more semi-educated discussion.. Instead you come in hot "WELL THEY LYING AGAIN!
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:50 pm to Gaggle
quote:
When the pebble strikes, there is no force of gravitational resistance. The telescope is weightless. It should simply push it, right?
“Weightless” doesn’t mean zero inertia.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 4:03 pm to Gaggle
quote:
So why would there be any structural resistance to a pebble? When the pebble strikes, there is no force of gravitational resistance. The telescope is weightless. It should simply push it, right?
Lol, there is no way a grown arse person is this dumb. You’ve got a lot to learn from liberator in the Troll arts.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 10:20 pm to Volvagia
Was he being serious?
No way he believes that. Lol
No way he believes that. Lol
Posted on 7/21/22 at 10:31 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
Not impactful" and significant damage" do not add up.
Joe received "significant uncorrectable damage" to his hand, "fortunately this change is not especially impactful" on how he functions as a whole
Posted on 7/21/22 at 10:35 pm to Geekboy
quote:to be fair, that is $10 billion in government dollars. Could have been done with just $1 billion in private dollars
.10 BILLION DOLLARS!!!
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:51 pm to Geekboy
I didn’t think the damn aliens would let us have this. Mfers will not even let us go back to the moon.
Assholes
Assholes
Posted on 7/22/22 at 6:42 am to Gaggle
quote:
Space could not be faker or gayer
So space is fake and gay?
Posted on 7/22/22 at 6:50 am to DarthRebel
quote:
68gb device
That is plenty of space for images, especially if the data is being aged out and storage reused.
To you the glass is half empty.
To me the glass is half full.
To the engineer, the container is twice as large as it needs to be.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 8:22 am to JudgeHolden
So I watched the PBS Nova special on this thing last night. Holy crap! This thing was 20x over budget and 15 years late. No wonder it has old technology on it already. Plus, it is in an area where we can't reach it if we need to make any adjustments or repairs, which you know will happen. Bet this ends in a disaster when it is all said and done.
Posted on 7/23/22 at 11:09 pm to Volvagia
quote:Actually, the infrared imaging sensors work best in the cold. Heat is the enemy of imaging sensors. It excites electrons and creates hot spotting and background read noise.
The mirror and the sensors needs to be that cold. The electronics is probably on the “warm” side of the device.
Posted on 7/23/22 at 11:10 pm to USMCguy121
quote:
So, no more photos from webb?
Come on devildog, read yo shite.
Posted on 7/23/22 at 11:24 pm to IAmNERD
quote:There can be a statistically significant reduction in reliability that doesn't have any practically meaningful effect size.
Not impactful" and significant damage" do not add up.
Popular
Back to top

0








