Started By
Message

re: Well, the usual lying begins. Webb telescope.

Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:09 pm to
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18703 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

"Not impactful" and significant damage" do not add up.


Maybe read words in their context?

quote:

"significant uncorrectable change" to segment C3
quote:

not especially impactful on how the telescope as a whole


One phrase applies to segment C3, which is not critical to the telescope as a whole
Posted by USMCguy121
Northshore
Member since Aug 2021
6332 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:11 pm to
So, no more photos from webb?
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122077 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:13 pm to
When it comes to conspiracy theories, I question things and there are a lot of things I can come up with theories for, other than what has been reported, but I don't just automatically believe something else because it could make sense.

But I guess since you say its the usual lying then its the usual lying. And its an absolute fact.

Why not word it like "this happened and I think there is a chance this could be ________. What are your thoughts?" then people can have a more semi-educated discussion.. Instead you come in hot "WELL THEY LYING AGAIN!
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53386 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

When the pebble strikes, there is no force of gravitational resistance. The telescope is weightless. It should simply push it, right?


“Weightless” doesn’t mean zero inertia.
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1753 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

So why would there be any structural resistance to a pebble? When the pebble strikes, there is no force of gravitational resistance. The telescope is weightless. It should simply push it, right?


Lol, there is no way a grown arse person is this dumb. You’ve got a lot to learn from liberator in the Troll arts.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74207 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 10:20 pm to
Was he being serious?
No way he believes that. Lol
Posted by FAP SAM
Member since Sep 2014
3251 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

Not impactful" and significant damage" do not add up.



Joe received "significant uncorrectable damage" to his hand, "fortunately this change is not especially impactful" on how he functions as a whole
Posted by bee Rye
New orleans
Member since Jan 2006
34570 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

.10 BILLION DOLLARS!!!
to be fair, that is $10 billion in government dollars. Could have been done with just $1 billion in private dollars
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
49830 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:51 pm to
I didn’t think the damn aliens would let us have this. Mfers will not even let us go back to the moon.

Assholes
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
15180 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 6:42 am to
quote:

Space could not be faker or gayer


So space is fake and gay?

Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 6:50 am to
quote:

68gb device


That is plenty of space for images, especially if the data is being aged out and storage reused.

To you the glass is half empty.

To me the glass is half full.

To the engineer, the container is twice as large as it needs to be.
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
9647 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 8:22 am to
So I watched the PBS Nova special on this thing last night. Holy crap! This thing was 20x over budget and 15 years late. No wonder it has old technology on it already. Plus, it is in an area where we can't reach it if we need to make any adjustments or repairs, which you know will happen. Bet this ends in a disaster when it is all said and done.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51705 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

The mirror and the sensors needs to be that cold. The electronics is probably on the “warm” side of the device.
Actually, the infrared imaging sensors work best in the cold. Heat is the enemy of imaging sensors. It excites electrons and creates hot spotting and background read noise.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
39199 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 11:10 pm to
quote:

So, no more photos from webb?

Come on devildog, read yo shite.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12421 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

Not impactful" and significant damage" do not add up.
There can be a statistically significant reduction in reliability that doesn't have any practically meaningful effect size.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram