- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Waukesha Christmas Parade Massacre Trial - Brooks Gets 6-Life Sent. + 762.5 yrs in prison
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:07 pm to Gris Gris
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:07 pm to Gris Gris
To be fair to the witness, he said he was getting hammered by media requests and decided to let a "manager" handle the requests.
The witness said they paid taxes on it and donated a lot of it.
The witness said they paid taxes on it and donated a lot of it.
1
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:07 pm to Gris Gris
Still hasn't learned what "hearsay" is.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:08 pm to Gris Gris
I thought it seemed a little sleazy at first, but it’s not any different than the media or YouTube personalities making money off the tragedy.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:08 pm to bikerack
quote:
To be fair to the witness, he said he was getting hammered by media requests and decided to let a "manager" handle the requests.
The witness said they paid taxes on it and donated a lot of it.
I'm more on the lines of "it's unethical for news organizations to pay to get their stories"
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:08 pm to rt3
quote:
I wouldn't have let a strange dude use my phone... let alone let him into my house and make him a sandwich
When Brooks was questions him about being paid for the ring video I really wanted the witness to say …
“I sold the video because I thought I needed to be reimbursed for the sandwich I gave you”
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:10 pm to WaWaWeeWa
I wanted the witness to say "you're welcome for the sandwich"
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:11 pm to bikerack
90 minute lunch break?
why the extra 30 minutes?
why the extra 30 minutes?
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:16 pm to rt3
quote:
90 minute lunch break?
why the extra 30 minutes?
Made no sense to me. All she said was that they went a little long this morning. If she wants to move this trial along, a long lunch break is contrary to that goal.
I don't have a problem with the guy selling the video to the media. He is free to do it. I don't think I would have. It sounds bad, but he already provided it to law enforcement. As the prosecution, I would have preferred that it not have been out in the public, though, prior to trial.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:22 pm to Wayne Campbell
quote:
Still hasn't learned what "hearsay" is
It's amazing how this is giong for him. Can the judge say it has already been noted you don't consent to being called your name. Drop it lol
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:28 pm to Areddishfish
Why is this guy defending himself?
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:31 pm to jlovel7
quote:
Why is this guy defending himself?
b/c for some stupid reason sovereign citizens believe representing themselves will get them extra help or leniency or whatever from the court
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:37 pm to Areddishfish
quote:
It's amazing how this is giong for him. Can the judge say it has already been noted you don't consent to being called your name. Drop it lol
She did that this morning. He won't listen. She has also instructed him not to talk until the prosecution completes their objections and their grounds. He has ignored that as well. He still says "grounds" as soon as he hears the first syllable of "objection".
ETA: I still don't know if there is a name he does consent to. I don't know his purpose in objecting to his name.
This post was edited on 10/17/22 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:41 pm to jlovel7
quote:
Why is this guy defending himself?
So he can appeal for improper representation after he gets convicted.
The goal is the delay this as much as possible
Posted on 10/17/22 at 12:58 pm to autauga
quote:
Richie going home to this.
Is her name Lori Beth?
Side Note: She looks like one of my exes… Holy shite…
This post was edited on 10/17/22 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 10/17/22 at 1:09 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
So he can appeal for improper representation after he gets convicted.
The judge has reminded him on multiple occasions of his choice to represent himself.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 1:41 pm to Gris Gris
He brought up subject matter jurisdiction again and the judge completely ignored him.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 1:50 pm to rt3
quote:
b/c for some stupid reason sovereign citizens believe representing themselves will get them extra help or leniency or whatever from the court
This judge has helped him every step of the way. She's as much his counsel as she is a judiciary.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 1:58 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
ETA: I still don't know if there is a name he does consent to. I don't know his purpose in objecting to his name.
He signed his subpoenas as DARRELL BROOKS so maybe they just need to yell his name instead.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:17 pm to MFn GIMP
He asked her who is the "you" she was referring to.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:17 pm to MFn GIMP
This dude might be the most unlikeable pussy I’ve ever witnessed in a courtroom. This is exactly why the 5th amendment was created. I would convict this guy strictly on being a raging a-hole.
Page 27 of 184
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News