Started By
Message

re: Was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary?

Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:01 pm to
Posted by GumpInLex
Lexington, KY
Member since Nov 2011
1622 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:01 pm to
Right... but my point is that they would not have surrendered at all had we not given them that “out”
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

the point is that American casualties in the Pacific are not connected to the use of the bombs


Do you mean to say the Japanese would have surrendered on the same date, regardless of the use of the A-Bombs?
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36287 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

The easy counter argument is if they were so close to surre



Because baw, they were already decimated, but content to surrender on their own time while we lobbed nukes at them
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
86749 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

The easy counter argument is if they were so close to surrendering, why didn't they after we dropped the first one.


It was a dumb thing for them to do for sure

The point is that we could have easily ended the Pacific Theater without more American casualties and without dropping the bombs had we wanted to.

Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
86749 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Do you mean to say the Japanese would have surrendered on the same date, regardless of the use of the A-Bombs?


we could have gotten a surrender out of them at an even earlier date
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36287 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

point is that we could have easily ended the Pacific Theater without more American casualties and without dropping the bombs had we wanted to.


Oh yeah? How
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
86749 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Oh yeah? How


go back to my OP
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36287 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:04 pm to
I’m not clicking your links and your OP has no solutions
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

we could have gotten a surrender out of them at an even earlier date


apparently not

So we were just fricking about in the Pacific?

Now you've taken this one step further. No longer did we drop the bombs and "unnecessarily" kill civilians...we've also extended the war on purpose just so we can drop the bombs, presumably to intimidate the Soviets.
Posted by ZappBrannigan
Member since Jun 2015
7692 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:06 pm to
Any further delays would've lead to Russians at the table.

The had their chance from July 26 to August 5 to accept Potsdam.
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
26118 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:07 pm to
You had 3 options to end the Asia pacific war.

1.starve them out
2. Invade them
3. Drop the atomic bombs.

The bombs saved a lot of lives on both sides. Lots of people always forget about the civilians starving elsewhere in the Japanese occupied territory too
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
86749 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

So we were just fricking about in the Pacific?


At that point we wouldn't accept a surrender that included keeping the Emperor

Then we dropped 2 nukes and then immediately accepted a surrender that included keeping the Emporer


So you tell me
Posted by OptionRight
Down da skreet
Member since Sep 2010
826 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:07 pm to
I’m fairly certain history details the US publicly advertising that explicit instructions were given and talks occurred....they refused....they were showboating the US for all the world to see...so if you have a combatant on the ropes and you say, hit the mat or I’ll knock you out, are you supposed to wait for him to recover or call his buddies or do you put him down? In life and war, there are choices that you make. Right or wrong there are consequences to your actions. Why are you not questioning what the Japanese leadership could have done to prevent casualties?
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:08 pm to
It has to do with semantics, Japanese cultural understanding of honor, and the failure of diplomacy. Japan was willing to surrender and meet terms. It was the language of "unconditional surrender" that was culturally dishonorable. After the second bomb they were past holding on to that honor. Japanese let their people die for "honor" with out substance but we also killed a lot of people for honor with out substance.
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
11807 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:08 pm to
Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see your response to the question of why Japan didn't immediately surrender after the first bomb was dropped.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
86749 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see your response to the question of why Japan didn't immediately surrender after the first bomb was dropped.



It was a dumb thing for them to do for sure

The point is that we could have easily ended the Pacific Theater without more American casualties and without dropping the bombs had we wanted to.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
86749 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Why are you not questioning what the Japanese leadership could have done to prevent casualties?


that's a less interesting question
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44052 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

The point is that we could have easily ended the Pacific Theater without more American casualties and without dropping the bombs had we wanted to.


Easily huh?

Just so simple right?



Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
86749 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Easily huh?

Just so simple right?


Yeah, it involves accepting the terms we refused until after the bombings
Posted by Polycarp
Texas
Member since Feb 2009
5675 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:11 pm to
Well hell yeah it was, frick the Japs!
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram