Started By
Message

re: Was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary?

Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:22 pm to
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46028 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

was so unacceptable about the way they wanted to surrender


But you admitted earlier you don't even know the way they wanted to surrender prior to the bombs?
Posted by Sancho Panza
La Habaña, Cuba
Member since Sep 2014
8161 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:23 pm to
Yes. Drop that fricker. Twice.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

To second guess the actions of the men who were fighting the war? Most certainly.


Okay cool, so nobody can have an opinion on anything unless it's their line of work or they have first hand knowledge of whatever situation is being discussed. Got it.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89131 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

That we dropped the bombs is not my issue, the false narrative that we dropped them to save a million soliders from having to invade the mainland is.




Prove it false, with something other than read my OP.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36763 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

mean i think using the bombs as a show of force against the Russians isn't the worst idea in the world so i don't know i would have done anything differently.

That we dropped the bombs is not my issue, the false narrative that we dropped them to save a million soliders from having to invade the mainland is.



Answer the god damn question. How would we have gotten an earlier surrender?
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Prove it false


read my OP
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:24 pm to
Yes it was necessary
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

How would we have gotten an earlier surrender?


by accepting keeping the emperor which we did anyway.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

that's the spin version Really???? They were ready to accept an unconditional surrender prior to the dropping of the atomic bombs? Link please?


Hey. Provide link to where Japan was ready to accept unconditional surrender prior to dropping A-Bomb, or your entire premise is BS.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:25 pm to
read my OP
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46028 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Okay cool, so nobody can have an opinion on anything unless it's their line of work or they have first hand knowledge of whatever situation is being discussed. Got it.


You can have an opinion, but it's worthless.

I mean I can go give an opinion to an engineer on his latest project, but it means exactly jack shite since I'm not an engineer.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36763 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

accepting keeping the emperor which we did anyway.




Keeping him as a figurehead or in control? 2 very different things
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

You can have an opinion, but it's worthless.

I mean I can go give an opinion to an engineer on his latest project, but it means exactly jack shite since I'm not an engineer.


I guess we should shut down TD.com then
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

read my OP


your wrote a wall of text and provided ETA: 5 links.

No thank you. If the information I'm asking for is in there please point me to it.
This post was edited on 4/17/18 at 4:28 pm
Posted by ZappBrannigan
Member since Jun 2015
7692 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:26 pm to
He's also talking out his arse as we agreed not to bring a god emperor down to manhood. We got what we wanted. We were the authority in Japan. The people made themselves a new government and the emperor became a tourist attraction on a slightly higher level than Sitting Bull.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Keeping him as a figurehead or in control? 2 very different things


figurehead in both scenarios
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
39270 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

quote: You keep saying this but it did not.



LINK


quote:

Since the enactment of the 1947 Constitution, he has been a ceremonial head of state without even nominal political powers.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:27 pm to
Did you really just link the emperor of Japan wiki page? And it says this....

quote:

The role of the Emperor as head of the State Shinto religion was exploited during the war, creating an Imperial cult that led to kamikaze bombers and other fanaticism. This in turn led to the requirement in the Potsdam Declaration for the elimination "for all time [of] the authority and influence of those who have deceived and misled the people of Japan into embarking on world conquest". In State Shinto, the Emperor was believed to be a Arahitogami (a living god). Following Japan's surrender, the Allies issued the Shinto Directive separating church and state within Japan. Current constitution Edit The constitution provides for a parliamentary system of government and guarantees certain fundamental rights. Under its terms, the Emperor of Japan is "the symbol of the State and of the unity of the people" and exercises a purely ceremonial role without the possession of sovereignty. The constitution, also known as the "Constitution of Japan" (????? Nihonkoku-Kenpo, formerly written ????? (same pronunciation)), "Postwar Constitution" (???? Sengo-Kenpo) or the "Peace Constitution" (???? Heiwa-Kenpo), was drawn up under the Allied occupation that followed World War II and was intended to replace Japan's previous militaristic and quasi-absolute monarchy system with a form of liberal democracy. Currently, it is a rigid document and no subsequent amendment has been made to it since its adoption.


How exactly does that prove your point?

Please show me where Japan was ready to accept the above constitution before the bombs
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19485 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:27 pm to
They got my granddad out of a fricking prison in Japan, so I'm ok they were dropped when they were
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46028 posts
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

I guess we should shut down TD.com then


Yes, because football is on the same level with decisions made during a global war over 70 years ago.

This post was edited on 4/17/18 at 4:28 pm
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram