- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/14/18 at 4:05 pm to Big_Slim
quote:
Don’t think about in terms of 3 think about in terms of 100 like my example. The only way you would be wrong by switching doors is if your initial pick was correct which will occur 1% of the time. In other words, there’s a 99% chance it’s the other door. That’s variable change.
Good, simple analysis of the question that anyone should be able to grasp.
And in a real gambling scenario, there is another psychological factor that plays into the house's favor here. For those who don't grasp the variable change, their ego tends to make them keep their first pick, because it would be more disappointing to have given away the winning pick than it would be to keep your first choice and lose that way. That bit of human nature stacks the deck even more for the house.
Posted on 6/14/18 at 4:07 pm to GAFF
Posted on 6/14/18 at 4:09 pm to Barbellthor
quote:
If you're on The Price is Right on the punch-out game, and they eliminate 98 of the 100 sockets to win the prize (the correct choice is not 1-98; it's either 99 or 100), by this logic you have a 99% chance to win. Of the whole, that's true. But is the whole really still available? You have a 50% chance of picking the correct one as between 99 and 100. I think it's a matter of perspective as much as anything.
This is how I was thinking of it too, in a case of it being 1 out of 100.
So say you have a 1% chance of choosing the one box with a prize in it out of 100 boxes where the other 99 are empty. If you pick a box then remove 98 other boxes which are empty and are left with only 2 boxes. According to the Monty hall problem if given the option at that point to switch boxes you then have a 99% chance of winning the prize rather than 50% like you're suggesting by switching.
This post was edited on 6/14/18 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 6/14/18 at 4:45 pm to MLCLyons
quote:
Assume the person is always selecting door 1 first and then one of the other doors is opened to reveal a goat:
These are the only possibilities for the initial arrangements.
Door 1 - Door 2 - Door 3 - Stay - Change
goat --- goat ----- car -- ---- lose - win
goat --- car ----- goat -- ---- lose - win
car - -- goat ---- - goat ------ Win - lose
Overall there's a 50% chance of winning, but you can see that switching results in a win 2/3. The part that often gets left out is that one of the remaining doors is opened.
This is the most logical explanation I've seen so far and it has 3 down votes. Which of you morons down voted this?
Posted on 6/14/18 at 4:54 pm to 10Percenter
quote:what?
66% and 50% are both right given the perspective. We tend to like the odds of 66% better so we choose that option of thinking.
The key is the host KNOWS. That's the main factor with Monty Hall. So yeah you switch every time and increase your odds. Dude did a case by case à page ago, that should clear it up.
Posted on 6/14/18 at 5:09 pm to GAFF
quote:
He picks a door and they reveal its one of the piles of shite.
This isn't the Monty Hall problem. In that, they do not reveal what is behind the door that you have picked. Rather, they reveal one of the piles of shite behind another door and them ask you if you want to change your choice.
Posted on 6/14/18 at 6:37 pm to GAFF
Why don't they just buy a house that's already painted?
Popular
Back to top
