Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

US vs European amateur sports models

Posted on 7/4/20 at 6:56 pm
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
7951 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 6:56 pm
I always thought the US model tieing sports to schools made sense. I participated in scholarship sports in college.
Still am friends with HS and college teammates.

But, all this nonsense from NCAA guys got me revaluating this.
For example almost all major CFB and Basketball players are in total nonsense majors. They aren't really "students" its a fancy minor league.

European schools don't have sports. They rely on a club/community model.
This allows for participation into adulthood.

I think it's a legitimate question.

Should we ditch the whole scholastic sports model?

Only in college?

Thoughts?
Posted by BeerMoney
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2012
9013 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 6:57 pm to
Where are the pics of fricking javelin throwers and tennis players!!!!??? Downvoting
Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
15343 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 6:57 pm to
It took decades for it to devolve into this.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
67033 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 6:58 pm to
I was really looking forward to this thread
Posted by The Drizz
The Ville
Member since Jun 2010
1234 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 6:59 pm to
Posted by BeerMoney
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2012
9013 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 6:59 pm to
I know right!? The title just had Merica written all over it then this floppy dick shite materialized when I clicked in.
Posted by autodd03
Clown world
Member since Dec 2013
2532 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 6:59 pm to
Time has come to stop making special athletic exceptions for admittance at the very least
Posted by BeerMoney
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2012
9013 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 6:59 pm to
My man!
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
159142 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 7:00 pm to
Big time college sports is a corrupt travesty
Posted by BlackCoffeeKid
Member since Mar 2016
12889 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 7:03 pm to
Truth is probably that it the collegiate system works better for some sports and the European model works better for others.

As with most things, there's a middle ground.
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
7951 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

pics of javelin throwers and tennis players


I apologize.
I should do better.
I know the rules.
Posted by Tunasntigers92
The Boot
Member since Sep 2014
28361 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 7:03 pm to
What a disappointment this was
Posted by The Drizz
The Ville
Member since Jun 2010
1234 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 7:05 pm to
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49580 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 7:10 pm to
When you step away and look at it from a place of non-bias, tying sports to education is a really, really dumb model.
Posted by danilo
Member since Nov 2008
26360 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

I always thought the US model tieing sports to schools made sense. I participated in scholarship sports in college.

You seriously think institutions of higher education should have so much god damn emphasis on sports? Yikes
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
45439 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 7:16 pm to
I think our model is working extremely well.

Division 1 PARTICIPATION
• 179,200 student-athletes
• 351 colleges and universities

ACADEMICS
Graduation Success Rate: 87 percent




quote:

For example almost all major CFB and Basketball players are in total nonsense majors


make up less than 15% of student athletes on scholarship,

This post was edited on 7/4/20 at 7:21 pm
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 8:02 pm to
I like the European amateur sports model better.

Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57607 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Should we ditch the whole scholastic sports model?

No, don’t ditch it. Have both. The non-students can go to the semi-pro clubs, and the college teams will be made up of real students. Well, except Alabama.
Posted by tomcatrav
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2009
495 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 6:15 pm to
IMO, I think there should be two parallel systems.

1. A city or state based minor league, geared toward the players earning some income, development of their skill/talent, and making a living playing sports. In my mind, this would be all the 4 and 5 star guys (who may not necessarily want to pursue a degree ) playing against each other for a couple of years to develop themselves as players and ultimately make it to the pros.

AND

2. A collegiate system truly built for amateur athletics. Guys who are long shots at best to be pros and just wanna play football and represent their school while earning a real degree. (Most NCAA sports/teams are this already, but the major conferences (esp SEC) have become a defacto minor league.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram