Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

US shale drillers to reduce Permian emissions, increase reliability with nuclear reactors

Posted on 4/1/24 at 1:06 pm
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21206 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 1:06 pm
quote:

(Bloomberg) – U.S. oil and gas companies including Diamondback Energy Inc. are considering small nuclear reactors to power drilling operations in Texas’s Permian basin, a move aimed at cutting carbon emissions and ensuring reliable access to electricity.

Diamondback, the largest independent producer headquartered in the shale-oil region, has signed a nonbinding letter of intent with Oklo Inc. to deploy small reactors for some of its future power needs, according to Diamondback President Kaes Van’t Hof. Oklo, which is developing an advanced fission reactor, has held similar discussions with other oil companies, its chief executive officer said in an interview.

Permian producers have increasingly shifted their operations from diesel generators to electricity supplied by the local power grid. But the Texas grid can be shaky, especially in remote parts of the oil patch. A drilling site with its own nuclear plant would offer reliability without greenhouse gas emissions, since reactors generate power without spewing carbon dioxide.

“Small nuclear reactors could make sense as a low-cost, low-carbon, high-reliability alternative energy source for a company like Diamondback whose energy needs continue to increase,” Van’t Hof said by email.

It won’t happen soon, however. Oklo and other companies developing small reactors are years away from delivering commercial systems.

Oklo’s 15-megawatt system would be far smaller than the conventional reactors used today, which typically produce 1,000 megawatts of electricity. (A megawatt is enough to power 200 typical Texas homes.)

Supporters say small nuclear plants would be a good fit for powering industrial sites, especially in far-flung locales. Some companies are also interested in tapping heat from reactors, such as chemical giant Dow Inc., which has said it’s planning to power a Texas facility with a system from X-Energy Reactor Co.

Nuclear power is increasingly seen by policy makers as a key part of the fight against climate change. While there’s a growing push to eliminate fossil fuels, Oklo CEO Jacob DeWitte said it’s going to take a long time to curb the demand for oil. Incorporating nuclear power into the drilling process would help reduce greenhouse gases while oil is still needed.

“These fossil fuels are going to be produced. Do we want to burn carbon to produce them, or do we want to not burn carbon to produce them?” DeWitte said in an interview. “There’s a pretty obvious answer.”


LINK /
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62403 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 1:34 pm to
They want to eliminate fossil fuels by using Nuclear reactors to power the extraction of fossil fuels; did I read that right?
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12477 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

They want to eliminate fossil fuels by using Nuclear reactors to power the extraction of fossil fuels; did I read that right?

No. They want to use mini reactors to provide stable power to remote areas without having to build out a shite ton of infrastructure and blow money on fuel, logistics, etc. and also get the production tax credit to run from taxes.
This post was edited on 4/1/24 at 1:38 pm
Posted by Krane
Member since Oct 2017
849 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 1:39 pm to
Diamondback ran me off a couple of times
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62403 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

etc. and also get the production tax credit to run from taxes.


Aaahhh!
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83554 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

They want to eliminate fossil fuels by using Nuclear reactors to power the extraction of fossil fuels; did I read that right?


You did not read that right.

Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21206 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Diamondback ran me off a couple of times


What you did, baw? Put your pipe in the pipe slicer?
Posted by KemoSabe65
70605
Member since Mar 2018
5129 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 2:15 pm to
Prolly lost the key to the v door.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118736 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

has signed a nonbinding letter of intent with Oklo Inc.


I wonder how much these little guys cost and how many homes they can run?
Posted by Krane
Member since Oct 2017
849 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 2:35 pm to
My company said we could drill 750’/hr with good AGR resolution along with communications with the rotary steerable

We could not
This post was edited on 4/1/24 at 2:37 pm
Posted by BamaChemE
Midland, TX
Member since Feb 2012
7140 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 2:42 pm to
I wouldn’t hate it if these were small molten salt reactors…


BTW if any oil companies are reading this and want to support research into this by professor in the area that co-oped at nuclear plant years ago, I’d be more than happy to consult on those projects. (Need to make up for what Bidenomics has done and continues to do to my bank account)
Posted by SneezyBeltranIsHere
Member since Jul 2021
2452 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 2:55 pm to
There are a couple of California-based companies that have some very innovative technology for smaller & very safe reactors that will be changing all of our lives in the coming decades.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12477 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

I wonder how much these little guys cost and how many homes they can run?

$3-8MM per MWp to buy.
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
5559 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 4:24 pm to
You can’t build a nuclear reactor in less than 20 years in the United States. Period.

Just ask Georgia Power and South Carolina Electric and Gas.
Posted by bad93ex
Member since Sep 2018
27093 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

There are a couple of California-based companies that have some very innovative technology for smaller & very safe reactors that will be changing all of our lives in the coming decades.



I thought the US Military was working with small portable reactors for power as well.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12477 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

You can’t build a nuclear reactor in less than 20 years in the United States. Period.


True for grid-interconnected. Portable self consumption generation has always been a bit of a hot potato. Who permits it? Who inspects it? Who's the AHJ? Point being, they very well may not be beholden to the current issues, and certainly won't have the NIMBY attacks that cause so many delays. But maybe the feds lock it down and its worse (probable scenario). We'll see.
This post was edited on 4/1/24 at 5:47 pm
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
6404 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

2001: Utilities including Southern Co., the parent of Georgia Power Co., meet with federal regulators to discuss ways to ease permitting for new nuclear power plants, in a push by President George W. Bush's administration.


It started generating electricity last year. Confirmed.
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
5559 posts
Posted on 4/2/24 at 9:26 pm to
Thank you. That’s 23 years.
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
18799 posts
Posted on 4/2/24 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

BTW if any oil companies are reading this and want to support research into this by professor in the area that co-oped at nuclear plant years ago, I’d be more than happy to consult on those projects. (Need to make up for what Bidenomics has done and continues to do to my bank account)


Hmm…. You and I both may be acquainted with a certain professor who worked at Abilene Christian.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram