- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Update on "alien" mummies found in Peru
Posted on 10/13/17 at 10:28 am to ZappBrannigan
Posted on 10/13/17 at 10:28 am to ZappBrannigan
quote:
Words are wind and your proof and experts have been repeatedly debunked in this and other threads.
Nobody debunked me or my experts in this or any other thread.
Close=minded bigots have tried to debunk my experts and me but they can't because my experts and I are telling the truth.
Merely claiming to have debunked my experts and me isn't actually debunking my experts or me.
quote:
You're passionate about your lie or this character you've made on the internet.
You'll always be tree fiddied because you're a fraud, sometimes entertaining, but just a fraud in the end.
Wrong. I'm passionate about the truth regarding my sightings of a sea serpent swimming in SF Bay.
Nothing you are any other close-minded bigot says is going to stop me from telling people about my sightings of sea serpent swimming in SF Bay so you might as well give up lying about me.
0
Posted on 10/13/17 at 11:39 am to 1BamaRTR
quote:
That sounds to me like they are hiding it from the public.
quote:
Or they thought it was dumb thing and unimportant and they threw it away after a certain time.
Meh, the District 9 Coast Guard took my brother and me seriously enough to fly two Coast Guard helicopters over the area where we had our first sighting just a few minutes after we reported the sighting to them.
Then they took us seriously enough to ask us to send them as much information about the animal we saw including any drawings of the animal that we could do.
quote:
So let's say they (that officer specifically not the coast guard as whole) don't think it exists and so thinks your report of seeing a massive sea serpent is BS (and unimportant) so he throws it away.
You can make up false scenarios all day long in your lame attempt to try to debunk our assertion that we sent the Coast Guard a packet of information and drawings.
If your false scenario was the case then after we were informed by the person that the Coast Guard told him they never received our packet of information and drawings, when we contacted the Coast Guard after that and gave them the name of the person and address where we sent our packet of information and drawings, they wouldn't have told us that he was the correct person in charge at the time but he had retired and that the address was the correct address to send the packet of information and drawings. They would have responded to the person who inquired about the packet of information and drawings we sent them by saying they don't know if they ever received our packet of information and drawings not by saying no they never received anything from us.
quote:
You keep saying we're not open minded but it seems you're too open minded. You didn't actually see the serpent right next to you but you still are absolutely certain of what you saw. People don't always know what they see. Even eyewitnesses to crimes are not entirely reliable because they have been known to unknowingly add details that never happened. Again you saw this, as you claimed a mile away, and never saw the full thing or even a significant portion of it but you're still 100% certain of what you saw. It's possible you're just seeing what you are wanting to see.
Get your facts straight, bigot!
I've said over and over and over again that on February 5, 1985 my brother and I had a close definitive sighting from only 20 yards away of one of the animals when it crashed directly in front of us onto a submerged rocky ledge and exposed its entire body except for its tail above the surface of the water.
Are you claiming I can't know I saw a 60+ foot long sea serpent when it is directly in front of me and it exposes its entire body except for its tail above the surface of the water only 20 yards away from me then accurately describe what I saw?
If you are saying that then you are the crazy person.
This post was edited on 10/13/17 at 11:53 am
Posted on 10/13/17 at 11:48 am to DawgfaninCa
quote:
Meh, the District 9 Coast Guard took my brother and me seriously enough to fly two Coast Guard helicopters over the area where we had our first sighting just a few minutes after we reported the sighting to them.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 11:55 am to 1BamaRTR
quote:
Meh, the District 9 Coast Guard took my brother and me seriously enough to fly two Coast Guard helicopters over the area where we had our first sighting just a few minutes after we reported the sighting to them.
quote:
Posted on 10/13/17 at 4:41 pm to Jake88
quote:
Your sea serpent has yet to kill anyone.
How could you possibly even know that?
There have been people reported missing who were swimming in the Pacific ocean or SF Bay as well as people who were in a boat who disappeared whose bodies never were found including the 3 famous escapees from Alcatraz.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 4:50 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
The sea serpent we saw during our February 5, 1985 sighting attacked a group of sea lions which are mammals and chased one of them until the sea serpent got stuck on a submerged rocky ledge.
I don't think the sea serpent wanted to play patty cake with the sea lion.
quote:
All that detail from over a mile away?
Get your facts straight, bigot.
During our February 5, 1985 definitive sighting, the animal was directly in front of us and only 20 yards away when it got stuck on a submerged rocky ledge.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 6:43 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
The great white shark is actually real.
So are the sea serpents that have been seen in SF Bay and at Stinson Beach.
Marlene Martin who was one of the October 31, 1983 Stinson Beach eyewitnesses watched the animal for a while with binoculars as it headed out to sea and she said she saw the animal open its mouth and it had many long sharp teeth on both the upper and lower jaws.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 7:06 pm to DawgfaninCa
Hopefully by now everyone has realized that arguing with you is a complete waste of their time.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 7:24 pm to PowerTool
quote:
Hopefully by now everyone has realized that arguing with you is a complete waste of their time.
Anyone who tells me the mummies are just made out of resin or paper mache before they personally examine the mummies or present evidence proving that the mummies are just made out of resin or paper mache is wasting their time.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 7:40 pm to BlackAdam
quote:
Provide a link to where John Kirk talked about our video.
quote:
He wrote about it on Cryptomundo. May have been Loren Coleman. I don't remember.
Well I do remember.
It was Loren Coleman who wrote an article on Cryptomundo about our video not John Kirk.
quote:
Champagne's written report disputes that claim. You should read it then prove that he is incorrect.
quote:
Yeah. I don't care what a dude with an online degree, and no relevant published papers has to say.
In other words, you can't prove what Champagne wrote about in his written report is incorrect.
BTW, Champagne got his degree in Marine Biology BEFORE the university became on online university.
quote:
He says your video is his animal is a Type III animal.
Champagne said the animal MAY be a Type III animal. He didn't say it is a Type III animal.
Since he wrote his report suggesting that the animals MAY be a Type III animal, we have given him more information about the animals and he no longer thinks the animals MAY be a Type III animal.
quote:
Jeeze. Dig the hole deeper man.
I'm digging a deeper hole so I can throw all the close-minded bigots in it.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 9:27 am to PowerTool
quote:
Hopefully by now close-minded bigots have realized that arguing with you is a complete waste of their time.
FIFY
This post was edited on 10/15/17 at 10:21 am
Posted on 10/15/17 at 10:23 am to DawgfaninCa
Posted on 10/15/17 at 10:32 am to DawgfaninCa
Screw the little close-minded bigoted pussy who downvotes every post I make but doesn't have the courage to take me on in a one on one debate.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 10:35 am to DawgfaninCa
I just noticed that you're upvoting your own posts
Posted on 10/15/17 at 10:36 am to DawgfaninCa
quote:
DawgfaninCa
You should seek some psychiatric help
Posted on 10/15/17 at 10:42 am to MusclesofBrussels
quote:
DawgfaninCa
quote:
You should seek some psychiatric help
Says the little close-minded bigoted pussy.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 10:50 am to upgrayedd
quote:
I just noticed that you're upvoting your own posts
Prove it.
You are probably the close-minded bigot who automatically downvotes every one of my posts.
This post was edited on 10/15/17 at 10:53 am
Posted on 10/15/17 at 10:55 am to DawgfaninCa
quote:
Prove it
I see there's only one upvote on all your responses. That's why I think it's you. You can't disprove it, so I'm 100% correct.
quote:
You are probably the close-minded bigot who automatically downvotes every one of my posts.
Nah, but you can cry about it some more if it makes you feel better.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 12:33 pm to DawgfaninCa
You know what you saw. The problem is there has been so many false reports of things. Like Aliens and Big Foot. Only you and your brother were there. Trying to convince others could be impossible. Until one of these creatures dies and washes up some where and one is captured, people will not believe. As far as the alien bodies, some one has gone through a lot of trouble creating these things if they are hoaxes. Why haven't the scientific community taken time to at least examine these things? what is there to lose by checking them out?
Page 11 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News