- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: United CEO doubles down, calls passenger "belligerent", claims United followed rules
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:00 pm to NYNolaguy1
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:00 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
attorney thinks
quote:
one could argue
1
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:00 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:Nah, that 1 poster that 1 time said so... Just cause.
According to United Airlines’ contract of carriage, “(An) Oversold Flight means a flight where there are more Passengers holding valid confirmed Tickets that check-in for the flight within the prescribed check-in time than there are available seats.”
Brodkowitz said if the airline was removing people in order to make room for crew members, one could argue this was not an “oversold” situation.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:01 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
Wtf is so difficult for you to comprehend
Do me a favor and quote the definition of oversold in the contract.
Thanks.
Here let me help
quote:
An) Oversold Flight means a flight where there are more Passengers holding valid confirmed Tickets that check-in for the flight within the prescribed check-in time than there are available seats.”
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 11:03 pm
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:02 pm to NYNolaguy1
We obviously disagree on that. So why do you always circle back
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:02 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
“(An) Oversold Flight means a flight where there are more Passengers holding valid confirmed Tickets that check-in for the flight within the prescribed check-in time than there are available seats.”
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:04 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:05 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
obviously disagree on that. So why do you always circle back
So that's the sticking point. It's fair to agree to disagree here. Would a judge/jury rule that this flight was oversold?
I think we'd both agree the case pivots on that.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:06 pm to shel311
quote:y'all do realize that for every lawyer that argues one way that there is one on the other side
quote:
According to United Airlines’ contract of carriage, “(An) Oversold Flight means a flight where there are more Passengers holding valid confirmed Tickets that check-in for the flight within the prescribed check-in time than there are available seats.”
Brodkowitz said if the airline was removing people in order to make room for crew members, one could argue this was not an “oversold” situation.
And the verbiage "one could argue". Isn't quite as strong as you make it out to be
Oh, and dick. I was being self deprecating about the whole pass thing. Be a fricktard about it if you must. But your complete ignorance of anything mentioned is inexcusable.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:06 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:My apologies for an erred statement. The letter was to the Chicago Dept. of Aviation about their officer's actions.
Stopped reading.
LINK
The Senate subcommittee is also asking for answers from Oscar Munoz, CEO of UAL.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:07 pm to NYNolaguy1
Yeah, but the links...
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:08 pm to Hangit
Nah, I just don't like Bill Nelson.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:08 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:i think the simple explanation that we needed more seats than we had answers that
So that's the sticking point. It's fair to agree to disagree here. Would a judge/jury rule that this flight was oversold?
It will be interesting to see what happens, if anyone is paying attention in a day or two
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:08 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Yeah, but the links...
?
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:10 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:powerful
quote:
attorney thinks
quote:
one could argue
From an aviation expert no less
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:12 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
will be interesting to see what happens, if anyone is paying attention in a day or two
Honestly I don't think it really matters. The fact that this guy even remotely has a case will mean this will never sniff a courtroom. UAL will bury this as quickly as possible so everyone forgets about it.
The last thing they need is for this to go in front of jury and have even have the smallest possibility of winning in court, much less be kept alive in the public eye.
There's nothing good that can happen by fighting this in court.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 11:14 pm
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:14 pm to NYNolaguy1
No way it could go that way. We have two links that show the experts saying otherwise...
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:15 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Junky: United could have deemed the flight overbooked
DisplacedBuckeye: 100% correct
tigerfoot: It clearly reads you can be removed in an overbooked situation.
Me: wasn't overbooked, they did not sell more tickets than they had
tigerfoot: yes they did
United: Flight was not overbooked
United spokesman Jonathan Guerin said Tuesday that all 70 seats on United Express Flight 3411 were filled, but the plane was not overbooked
Take the L, fellas. Take the L.
DisplacedBuckeye: 100% correct
tigerfoot: It clearly reads you can be removed in an overbooked situation.
Me: wasn't overbooked, they did not sell more tickets than they had
tigerfoot: yes they did
United: Flight was not overbooked
United spokesman Jonathan Guerin said Tuesday that all 70 seats on United Express Flight 3411 were filled, but the plane was not overbooked
Take the L, fellas. Take the L.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:16 pm to tigerfoot
quote:See my post above.
But your complete ignorance of anything mentioned is inexcusable.
Take the L
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:18 pm to shel311
quote:
Junky: United could have deemed the flight overbooked
DisplacedBuckeye: 100% correct
Still 100% correct. Your link doesn't change that. Still winning.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:19 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Nah, I just don't like Bill Nelson
I was 3' from him about 10 years ago and his face is stretched so tight that I don't believe he can blink.
It is about 60% better on TV though. I wonder how a U.S. Senator can get such botched surgery? Wouldn't they have the best surgeons available?
His eyes are also kind of dead and he seems to run on autopilot.
Page 57 of 61
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News