- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tyreek Hill Arrest Footage Released
Posted on 9/11/24 at 5:43 pm to Ricardo
Posted on 9/11/24 at 5:43 pm to Ricardo
quote:
You put yourself in his place.
Whether he violated law after being pulled over? Why wouldn't I? Why wouldn't you?
Is this just a case of not wanting your TD online peers to down vote you for seeing the law for what it is, and siding with "Dindu"?
Posted on 9/11/24 at 5:58 pm to Sao
quote:
Do you realize what you just wrote
Ironic, coming from you when just upstream you actually wrote, “I can almost guarantee…” as a statement of fact.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 6:03 pm to SoFla Tideroller
You're retired Florida LEO.
You're endorsing his quotes. Yes?
This post was edited on 9/11/24 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 9/11/24 at 6:14 pm to Sao
Ok so he was driving only 20+ over the speed limit which is definitely excessive. He didn’t comply with the officers and got what he deserved. Who was that dipshit at the end of the end video that pulls over in traffic to assist the jackass Hill?
Posted on 9/11/24 at 6:18 pm to bengalman
quote:
He didn’t comply with the officer
and got what he deserved
He complied.
No he didn't.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 6:30 pm to bengalman
quote:
Ok so he was driving only 20+ over the speed limit which is definitely excessive
Could've been 51 MPH. It was an "observed" and a subjective guess.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 7:01 pm to Sao
quote:
He complied.
You're god damned right he did.
One of the officers made sure of it!
quote:
and got what he deserved
quote:
No he didn't
I think you may be right again...he did not get what he deserved.
What he deserves (in my opinion) is a beating worse than Rodney King!
to clarify...not for his latest actions, but for his previous violent transgressions of the law!
This post was edited on 9/11/24 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 9/11/24 at 7:02 pm to SoFla Tideroller
Don't bother feeding this fricking troll.
I've already called her out for making up shite in this thread and she readily admitted it!
I've already called her out for making up shite in this thread and she readily admitted it!
Posted on 9/11/24 at 7:03 pm to WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
Good one, Private Pyle.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 7:15 pm to WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
quote:
I think you may be right again...he did not get what he deserved.
What he deserves (in my opinion) is a beating worse than Rodney King!
Incredible.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 7:30 pm to Sao
quote:
Incredible.
Holy shite! This might be 3 times in a row where you're right?
That's got to be some kind of record for you?
Enjoy!
Posted on 9/11/24 at 7:38 pm to Ricardo
quote:
It's possible to be legally within one's rights, but be completely wrong to a reasonable person.
And, if that's the case, does that give the cops the authority act in a way that would, under normal circumstances, violate someone's rights?
In simpler terms, does someone acting inappropriately, but within their rights, give the police the right to violate their rights?
This post was edited on 9/11/24 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 9/11/24 at 8:53 pm to BabyTac
quote:
Every one of those cops should be fired.
Poor Tyreek Hill!!!!!!!! ESPN & Fox acting like he’s Saint George. Hill is a major, entitled POS.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:24 pm to NoBoDawg
I gotta be honest, he came off as a puss in that vid.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 10:03 pm to SwampGar
Who the frick is this ignorant count
Posted on 9/11/24 at 10:27 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Why does Tyreke think he can talk to the law in such a manner?
The first amendment?
Posted on 9/12/24 at 8:43 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:Sounds like you are trying to determine what the human eye can see through tinted windows by using emotions, conjecture and assumptions.
What I'm saying is we are looking at an image captured by a camera, not what the officer actually saw. It is well known that the human eye has more dynamic range and more resolving power than all but the most expensive of cameras. If the relatively low resolution body cam can distinguish those details, what could the human eye resolve?
Posted on 9/12/24 at 8:49 am to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
Sounds like you are trying to determine what the human eye can see through tinted windows by using emotions, conjecture and assumptions.
Not at all. What I'm saying is we really don't know what the officer saw. We know what the camera recorded. And that the human eye and a body cam do not resolve images the same way. There is literally ZERO emotion in what I wrote.
Is your reading comprehension of the English language really that bad?
This post was edited on 9/12/24 at 8:51 am
Posted on 9/12/24 at 8:51 am to Lonnie Utah
Longest thread ever an event that is literally meaningless.
Popular
Back to top


0





