re: Trudeau’s men trampled a walker ridden elderly Mohawk woman

quote:

---

gtshoh

---

Can I get this used in a sentence please?

quote:

---

Because this is TD, where right is white and white is right, and the right is always right because it’s right.

---

The lack of self awareness is hilarious

Good morning AMAT. Enjoy life today.

quote:

---

Stop projecting your racism. It’s a bad look.

---

ahh, time to start throwing the big R word around when you don’t have a leg to stand on.

pathetic

quote:

---

Refusals to disperse still a problem though.

---

Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Under the heading of "Fundamental Freedoms" the section states:

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

(a) freedom of conscience and religion;

(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;

(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and

(d) freedom of association.

quote:

---

hypocrisy

---

What perceived hypocrisy? The OP? Or my own thoughts regarding what is occurring in Canada?

Need to be more specific AMAT.

quote:

---

The fact you don’t see the hypocrisy here

---

Imagine hearing that from a shutdown supporter. Wow.

quote:

---

The lady is alive, why hasn't thread title been changed?

---

B/c the OP's brain is mush.

He needs to take a long break.

quote:

---

x News Contributor Admits to Creating Fake Story About Canadian Woman Being ‘Trampled’ to Death

---

LINK

quote:

---

OMLandshark

---

Time to change the thread title or RA this thread to get nuked. It's your credibility on the line here.

quote:

---

(c) freedom of peaceful assembly;

---

I couldn't know less about Canadian constitutional law if I had actively tried but in the lens of American jurisprudence, it doesn't fit this situation as I understand it.

You can not exercise a right if that exercise infringes on the rights of others. Purposely blocking commerce is not a right covered under our 1A and breaches the "peaceably" verbiage. It is often tolerated for short periods as a matter of equity. Peaceably and peaceful in con law are not just a synonym for non-violent.

This has nothing to do with the validity of their protests nor the proper actions of the Canadian government and one could make the argument these factors should allow for non-peaceful protests but the right to peaceful assembly is not the correct constitutional shield for those that are actively and consistently blocking commerce. There are however likely many of the protesters that fully meet the concept of peaceful assembly and their treatment is "required" to be different than those that are not.