re: Trading wife in for a Pre-Menopause Model

quote:

---

Well many instantly question validity when the data doesn't conform to ones agenda. Believe what you want or do not, makes no difference to me. People often find one skewed article that mirrors their point and consider it fact. As with my patients I present the information, it is up to the person to decide.

---

did i say a single thing about an article? i asked if you had a meta-analysis not some single study you as a doctor are trying to pass off as facts

i wasnt attacking you nor the data you presented as i simply have not looked into as I am a male and have had zero reason too.

i asked for a link to the meta analysis showing you were correct. as usual though with doctors....you immediately got defensive and wanted to act like a know it all and how dare someone question you.

here is a fact, doctors dont know everythign and most are not even close to up to date on hrt. i didnt even know you were a doctor when i asked, dont be so defensive.

again...do you have a link to the meta analysis showing what you posted to be fact? or atleast a really well designed peer reviewed study?

also for the claims you made to be factual that needs to be multi year study and what are the time frames of the increase in those percentages for cancer and heart disease? how did they determine causastion over just correlation?

and hoenstly as a doctor you should be asking these same questions.