- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Toyota V6 recall update
Posted on 6/17/26 at 1:12 pm to FOBW
Posted on 6/17/26 at 1:12 pm to FOBW
quote:
Toyota has a massive project on its hands with twin-turbo V6 repairs.
Whoever thought it would be a great idea to replace the Tundra’s naturally aspirated 5.7L V8, probably one of the most reliable engines produced in the past half century*, with a two-turbo V6 should be tarred, feathered, tied to a tree, and beat with leather straps publicly as a warning to others to never repeat their insanely stupid decision.
* I had an ‘08 Tundra that I drove for years before handing down to my teenage son. It had just shy of 300K miles on it when it overheated and my son thought it was ok to drive it a “few” more miles.
This post was edited on 6/17/26 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 6/17/26 at 1:19 pm to AlaskanLSUfan
quote:
I have a 24 Tundra Hybrid and Toyota doesn’t include the hybrids in the recall even though it’s the same engine. They claim in the event of an emergency, the hybrid motor can supposedly get you off the road.
Thankfully I got the extended power train warranty, so if something does go awry I’m covered, but it sucks knowing that I’m driving a ticking timebomb.
There's been speculation that the hybirds have a lower failure rate because of the way the hybrid system supports the ICE during higher load events that are starving the rear main bearings under quick load changes.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 1:54 pm to Athis
quote:
No Turbo and no Hybrid crap.
Toyotas Hybrids are very reliable. They’ve been making them for decades now.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 2:01 pm to FOBW
Short block.
I doubt they're doing long block.
I doubt they're doing long block.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:53 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Whoever thought it would be a great idea to replace the Tundra’s naturally aspirated 5.7L V8
Should at least be an option but maybe they can’t bc of CAFE
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:56 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
I think too people see that Toyota is actually doing the right thing and replacing engines and that is reassuring
That’s a good point.
quote:
But the Toyota recall is like 1/5 the size of the Chevy 6.2 recall
maybe the sheer number of bad GM engines is what prevents GM from just replacing them all?
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:21 pm to biglego
There's speculation building that the issue is a design flaw not quality control from the factory.
If it is actually the cam grinding on the bearings then a new engine is just a band aid.
If it is actually the cam grinding on the bearings then a new engine is just a band aid.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:25 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Whoever thought it would be a great idea to replace the Tundra’s naturally aspirated 5.7L V8, probably one of the most reliable engines produced in the past half century*,
Not too long ago, I remember many people in here complaining the old 5.7 was archaic & too thirsty. It’s too bad though that Toyota couldn’t design a more modern, fuel efficient v8 for the Tundra, GX & LX. My Wife’s old GX has the 4.7 & it’s a really good v8 too.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:28 pm to NoBoDawg
quote:
I remember many people in here complaining the old 5.7 was archaic & too thirsty.
It’s a valid argument. They drank gas and didn’t make a much power. I like the power of the new v6, especially in a heavy pig like the LX. I just with they hadn’t fricked up the oil system design. I’m still happy I upgraded. The GX was to outdated and underpowered.
Popular
Back to top


2






