Started By
Message

re: Toyota V6 recall update

Posted on 6/17/26 at 1:12 pm to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74436 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Toyota has a massive project on its hands with twin-turbo V6 repairs.


Whoever thought it would be a great idea to replace the Tundra’s naturally aspirated 5.7L V8, probably one of the most reliable engines produced in the past half century*, with a two-turbo V6 should be tarred, feathered, tied to a tree, and beat with leather straps publicly as a warning to others to never repeat their insanely stupid decision.

* I had an ‘08 Tundra that I drove for years before handing down to my teenage son. It had just shy of 300K miles on it when it overheated and my son thought it was ok to drive it a “few” more miles.
This post was edited on 6/17/26 at 2:16 pm
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18880 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

I have a 24 Tundra Hybrid and Toyota doesn’t include the hybrids in the recall even though it’s the same engine. They claim in the event of an emergency, the hybrid motor can supposedly get you off the road.
Thankfully I got the extended power train warranty, so if something does go awry I’m covered, but it sucks knowing that I’m driving a ticking timebomb.

There's been speculation that the hybirds have a lower failure rate because of the way the hybrid system supports the ICE during higher load events that are starving the rear main bearings under quick load changes.
Posted by NoBoDawg
Member since Feb 2014
2347 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

No Turbo and no Hybrid crap.

Toyotas Hybrids are very reliable. They’ve been making them for decades now.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
40163 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 2:01 pm to
Short block.

I doubt they're doing long block.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85367 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

Whoever thought it would be a great idea to replace the Tundra’s naturally aspirated 5.7L V8


Should at least be an option but maybe they can’t bc of CAFE
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85367 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

I think too people see that Toyota is actually doing the right thing and replacing engines and that is reassuring


That’s a good point.

quote:

But the Toyota recall is like 1/5 the size of the Chevy 6.2 recall


maybe the sheer number of bad GM engines is what prevents GM from just replacing them all?
Posted by ozktgr
North Arkansas
Member since Mar 2020
411 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:21 pm to
There's speculation building that the issue is a design flaw not quality control from the factory.

If it is actually the cam grinding on the bearings then a new engine is just a band aid.
Posted by NoBoDawg
Member since Feb 2014
2347 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

Whoever thought it would be a great idea to replace the Tundra’s naturally aspirated 5.7L V8, probably one of the most reliable engines produced in the past half century*,

Not too long ago, I remember many people in here complaining the old 5.7 was archaic & too thirsty. It’s too bad though that Toyota couldn’t design a more modern, fuel efficient v8 for the Tundra, GX & LX. My Wife’s old GX has the 4.7 & it’s a really good v8 too.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18880 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

I remember many people in here complaining the old 5.7 was archaic & too thirsty.

It’s a valid argument. They drank gas and didn’t make a much power. I like the power of the new v6, especially in a heavy pig like the LX. I just with they hadn’t fricked up the oil system design. I’m still happy I upgraded. The GX was to outdated and underpowered.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram