- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/20/15 at 1:24 pm to tigerman03
quote:
You'd never guess that with the amount of exposure they get.
The prevalence is about 3 1/2 to 4% of the population at large. They tend to migrate to LGBT-friendly areas, driving the population percentages up in those places.
But, realistically, out the door, there aren't more than 12 million in the U.S., about the population of Pennsylvania.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 1:24 pm to tigerman03
quote:
So the city with the highest percentage of LGBT has a whopping 6.2%?
You'd never guess that with the amount of exposure they get.
Right, which is why all this pandering to gays makes no sense.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 1:25 pm to S
I bet Metairie is not adding much to NOLA's percentage.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 1:26 pm to S
quote:
Top 10 Highest % LGBT population amongst 50 largest US metro areas
Did they not poll Atlanta? I don't trust these stats.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 1:27 pm to S
NOLA home to Richard Simmons and Ellen
Posted on 3/20/15 at 1:28 pm to constant cough
Yea because giving equal rights to such a small group is just an absurd notion 
Posted on 3/20/15 at 1:29 pm to Mung
The frickin'est person I know is a chick that grew up Mormon.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 1:32 pm to Superior Pariah
quote:
Yea because giving equal rights to such a small group is just an absurd notion
Whoa whoa whoa at least use the correct nomenclature.
"Equal Privileges"
Continue.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 1:33 pm to Superior Pariah
You mean change the definition of marriage?
Posted on 3/20/15 at 2:44 pm to Superior Pariah
quote:
Posted by Superior Pariah Yea because giving equal rights to such a small group is just an absurd notion
It only becomes an "equal rights" issue when you redefine what marriage means.
We have let people who never believed in marriage in the first place redefine it so they could turn it into an equal protection issue so that the courts would have to be on their side.
And for what purpose? The best intentions that could be ascribed are not worth redefining marriage. We could easily have given equal protection under the law to any two people who wanted it and would agree to be bound to each other without calling it marriage.
The worst intentions that could be ascribed are truer to what motivated the radicals that brought this about: they hate traditional institutions and marriage is the most traditional of them all.
And don't look for hatred of gays in me because you won't find it.
This post was edited on 3/20/15 at 2:45 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News