- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on climate science?
Posted on 4/6/25 at 7:08 am to SloaneRanger
Posted on 4/6/25 at 7:08 am to SloaneRanger
quote:here's the problem, as long as they do nothing. Nothing is really gonna change on earth.
China and India
1
Posted on 4/6/25 at 7:09 am to UFFan
The climate changes daily. Just try to get the sensationalism out of it.
Oh and stay dry.
Oh and stay dry.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 7:21 am to UFFan
Ice age! Polar caps melting! Ozone! Coast disappearing! Oceans rising! Global warming! Climate change! Muh polar bears!
#paymoretaxestosavetheearth
#paymoretaxestosavetheearth
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:28 am to NotoriousFSU
quote:
I believe climate change is the biggest threat to humanity ever. The only way to fix it is throwing countless billions, if not trillions of tax payer dollars at it and also taking away people’s freedoms.
Don't forget to make the politicians that promote it rich(er).
Al Gore needs another billion. If you disagree, you are a nazi.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:40 am to redstick13
quote:
Are we denying that climate change is happening at all or just denying that it’s man made?
Nah! Did climate change begin at the start of the industrial Age?
Then what caused the continents to separate. The upheaval recorded on the walls of the Grand Canyon.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:45 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
There is science behind climate change,
The climate models are garbage
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:46 am to UFFan
Vast majority of it ia agenda driven trash. Would be much more beneficial to policymaking/discussion if it wasnt so geared towards blaming mankind for everything.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:47 am to TigerAllNightLong
quote:
The climate models are garbage
Because Science got involved with politics and the money that comes with it.
There is real science behind it, but its hard to tell whats real and not because of all the lies that came with the politicalization.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:48 am to redstick13
quote:
Are we denying that climate change is happening at all or just denying that it’s man made?
Climate is always changing.
The degree to which humans is impacting climate is extremely small.
There is no climate emergency.
Sorry.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:50 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
There is science behind climate change, but they screwed the pooch by constantly giving false doomsday information.
…and falsifying data.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:51 am to TT9
quote:
Nothing is really gonna change on earth.
Replyreplies0...
Which is why things like the Paris Agreement are so bogus. It penalizes developed nations and lets developing nations run amok.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 9:46 am to UFFan
The earth is actually in a cooling period. Government wants more tax dollars and control.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 9:48 am to UFFan
It’s not Science. It’s Political Science. Same as Covid.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 9:50 am to UFFan
It's a scam.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 9:52 am to UFFan
There are a few parts to the problem but everyone would like to lump it together in the question: Do you believe in climate change.
Well it's changing regardless of what you believe. The biggest questions are:
What is the rate of change?
What factors are affecting the rate of change?
What are the various outcomes?This is affected by the rate of change.
What would reasonable solutions look like and how much will they cost?
All I see right now is a huge bias towards gloom and doom forecasts with no discussion of the merits of the various studies. Error bounds and validity of the models aren't discussed in the news. Validity by being able to actually post predict given known inputs is the elephant in the room that is never mentioned.
Given the problematic predictive power of the various models there seem to be many who are rushing to give multi billions of dollars away and will alter whole industries and economies. This alone makes me very skeptical of motives and intent.
So to sum it up. The folks hell bent on spending hundreds of billions into the trillions of tax dollars would call me a denier. The folks who believe that man has zero impact would call me a radical. Either way I care little what anyone would think. It's more important to me that someone would take a little bit of time to exercise some critical thought on a complex subject than to state that they are either a believer or a denier.
Well it's changing regardless of what you believe. The biggest questions are:
What is the rate of change?
What factors are affecting the rate of change?
What are the various outcomes?This is affected by the rate of change.
What would reasonable solutions look like and how much will they cost?
All I see right now is a huge bias towards gloom and doom forecasts with no discussion of the merits of the various studies. Error bounds and validity of the models aren't discussed in the news. Validity by being able to actually post predict given known inputs is the elephant in the room that is never mentioned.
Given the problematic predictive power of the various models there seem to be many who are rushing to give multi billions of dollars away and will alter whole industries and economies. This alone makes me very skeptical of motives and intent.
So to sum it up. The folks hell bent on spending hundreds of billions into the trillions of tax dollars would call me a denier. The folks who believe that man has zero impact would call me a radical. Either way I care little what anyone would think. It's more important to me that someone would take a little bit of time to exercise some critical thought on a complex subject than to state that they are either a believer or a denier.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 9:57 am to UFFan
quote:
Thoughts on climate science?
The same people that move the goal posts every 5-10 years when they realize their bullshite projections aren’t gonna materialize?
Posted on 4/6/25 at 9:57 am to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:They push fear, because fear sells which means they get paid.
Climate science/climatology is a valid science, unfortunately it's been taken over by leftist loons who push doomsday scenarios and just flat out lies.
What they do, which gets repeatedly ignored is simple act as though climate data before 300 years or so ago doesn’t exist. Especially if it contradicts the narrative.
We’re still in a cool phase, had a genuine ice age recently. Planet tends to warm up after those
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:08 am to SloaneRanger
When they start telling you an essential part of life CO2 is deadly to the planet....
When they ignore the fact that PPM CO2 is at its lowest in centuries and not far from population collapse.... you know it's bullshite.
They are heading people off a cliff while making a frick load of money and people cheer for it.
They released a study last April where they admitted in some of the most cited studies they ignored the Giant Heat Ball in the sky and it's effects on the planet.
It's all a farce.
When they ignore the fact that PPM CO2 is at its lowest in centuries and not far from population collapse.... you know it's bullshite.
They are heading people off a cliff while making a frick load of money and people cheer for it.
They released a study last April where they admitted in some of the most cited studies they ignored the Giant Heat Ball in the sky and it's effects on the planet.
It's all a farce.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:11 am to UFFan
Trust the preemptive pardon folks
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:18 am to UFFan
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News