Started By
Message

re: “The universe is a pretty big place. If it's just us..."

Posted on 12/13/16 at 9:00 pm to
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

So, having every planet in the universe being populated by human sized aliens adds nothing to the universe.



That's so fricking obvious I don't know why you'd bother trying to put a number on it.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28290 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 9:00 pm to
The volume of our solar system is a better metric. Over the next 10 thousand years we will be building all over the universe. the space between planets will be as busy as our air space today.
Posted by Crow Pie
Neuro ICU - Tulane Med Center
Member since Feb 2010
27936 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

The volume of our solar system is a better metric. Over the next 10 thousand years we will be building all over the universe. the space between planets will be as busy as our air space today.
And on the other hand..if one asteroid or comet the size of a football stadium hits the planet we will be lucky to start using stone tools again.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36654 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 9:11 pm to
quote:


It's still a waste of space.


So glad I scrolled to the bottom to see if you posted the right conclusion. I ain't reading all that.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18919 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

So, having every planet in the universe being populated by human sized aliens adds nothing to the universe.





You're not factoring in that you need empty space for orbits, buffering out harmful radiation, and other forces.
Posted by recruitnik
Campus
Member since Jul 2012
1223 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

The volume of our solar system is a better metric. Over the next 10 thousand years we will be building all over the universe. the space between planets will be as busy as our air space today.


What is "all over the universe?" Do you mean galaxy? The milky way is 100,000 light years across. Even if we could travel at light speed (which would make us massless), it would still take 100,000 light years to traverse our galaxy.

So no, we will not be all over the universe in 10,000 years. If we moved at light speed starting today we would have only covered 10% of the galaxy in only one degree of travel.
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
30182 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 9:28 pm to
Put down the bong and go to Chipotle.
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
61819 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 9:32 pm to
So your definition of useful space is that which is occupied by living creatures?

Not only is that a bad definition but I consider Most people worthless space
This post was edited on 12/13/16 at 9:34 pm
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
29994 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

What is "all over the universe?" Do you mean galaxy? The milky way is 100,000 light years across. Even if we could travel at light speed (which would make us massless), it would still take 100,000 light years to traverse our galaxy.

So no, we will not be all over the universe in 10,000 years. If we moved at light speed starting today we would have only covered 10% of the galaxy in only one degree of travel.


I 100% believe in "slip space".

Time is perceived as a straight line, but there is no proof it isn't merely a 4th dimension.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram