- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The OT is not what it used to be (rant thread)
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:20 pm to TeddyPadillac
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:20 pm to TeddyPadillac
Got pulled out.
0
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:20 pm to LucasP
i didnt mean I wanted MOD status, that's why I said screenshot the anchors.
That was a long shot pissing in the wind comment just to get a mod in here to balance the white knighters
you never know
That was a long shot pissing in the wind comment just to get a mod in here to balance the white knighters
you never know
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:23 pm to musick
quote:
you never know
Sometimes you do though.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:24 pm to LucasP
touche
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:26 pm to musick
So did he private message you about your thread? He sent me a very well thought out (and honestly reasonable) explanation for the thread I brought up. It really makes sense now and I'm glad we got to have a discussion about it.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:26 pm to musick
We should make LucasP "Mod for a day"
would love to see the shite he would come up with that day
would love to see the shite he would come up with that day
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:27 pm to Topwater Trout
I was joking around in the "man carries pillow through airport" thread and people got aggravated.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:30 pm to LucasP
He hasn't contacted me yet. I'm sure right now he's checking recent anchored posts and seeing if what we say has any weight.
Though I was just looking at the FAQ, and one of the rules states this:
I'm pretty sure that (terrible) "rule" covers most of the whacks/anchors. That and it also means half of the entire OT and Rant should be whacked
Though I was just looking at the FAQ, and one of the rules states this:
quote:
12. DO not posting anything that could potentially harm (or embarrass) LSU or TigerDroppings.com.
I'm pretty sure that (terrible) "rule" covers most of the whacks/anchors. That and it also means half of the entire OT and Rant should be whacked
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:31 pm to LucasP
he sent you a message about the kratom thread? care to explain?
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:32 pm to musick
On its surface, it certainly looks like a catch-all kind of rule, and maybe a bit lazy. But once he explains it through that private message, it will make more sense.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:33 pm to musick
He hasn't sent you one yet?
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:34 pm to LucasP
He hasn't sent me anything yet, which is kind of odd, seeing how he anchored THIS thread, asked for an example, and yet wont tell me why the very thread we are posting in now is anchored.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:35 pm to musick
quote:
DO not posting anything that could potentially harm (or embarrass) LSU or TigerDroppings.com.
I think this rule keeps us from having some great threads about LSU athletes. It's a damn good thing stuff like that does't come out as we can all agree it would look bad for LSU.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:35 pm to musick
I'm sure you'll get it soon. It's got some very compelling arguments that completely changed my perspective.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:37 pm to LucasP
quote:
I'm sure you'll get it soon. It's got some very compelling arguments that completely changed my perspective.
I'm starting to think you are trolling me now. Why would he PM you that fast yet sit on my topic, the very one he posted the actual question to me, in?
This can't be for real.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:39 pm to musick
I can't answer that question and it's really not our place to ask, this place works in mysterious ways, man.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:42 pm to LucasP
I just find it suspicious that I asked for actual reasonable data (as in anchored screenshot) in response to his question to actually have a serious discussion about it and he won't even respond to me, yet he already explained "compelling arguments" to you in a PM that quickly changed your mind.
You don't find that the least bit suspicious?
You don't find that the least bit suspicious?
This post was edited on 4/11/16 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:43 pm to musick
Wait, are we still joking here?
I honestly can't tell anymore.
I honestly can't tell anymore.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:44 pm to musick
But just to clarify, no I didn't get a private message. And no, none of your concerns were or will be addressed.
This post was edited on 4/11/16 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:45 pm to LucasP
quote:
But just to clarify, no I didn't get a private message. And no, none of your concerns were or will be addressed.
then why ask?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News