Started By
Message

re: The myth of ‘Cancer Alley’

Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:30 pm to
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
46452 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:30 pm to
So poor people deserve to die, I have heard that one before my friend, in a an asbestos deposition. what church did you say you belonged too? I fear you have a little surprise waiting for at the end.

But you are in the right field with right people so you will probably go far, hell Bayer even made the gas that killed all the Jews in concentration camps.

Btw your friends brought in 1000s of tons of dangerous chemical waste from the East Coast and buried it over Louisiana, because of lax registrations, easy payoffs, and lack of damages if caught. (Look it up) Basically because people were trusting and stupid, and life was cheap in Louisiana, so better to poison us then fancy New Yorkers or even New Jersey. Actually cheaper than paying the mob.

But you already knew that didn’t u
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
10832 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

That white people don’t care about environmental issues because they effect black, Brown, and ran people more than white people.

Seriously.



Well that is just stupid. For decades (especially those before any serious regulations were in place), plant hiring was racist as hell and driven by nepotism. If there is indeed validity to the term Cancer Alley, a lot more poor arse white people worked those plant jobs than black people.
Posted by WildManGoose
Member since Nov 2005
4584 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Since the propaganda piece from the OP didn’t bother to research any other stance than that supported by the LA Chemical Association, here’s a study that concludes otherwise.
When I see a title like "Waiting to Die" I immediately know I'm about to read something free of bias .

That's a study based on self-reporting and 3rd party reporting from a community with interest in a particular outcome. They can do all the monte carlo simulation they'd like, but the shite coming out is only as good as the shite going in.

If self-reporting isn't rigorous enough for a dick length study, why would it be for a serious cancer prevalence analysis?
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
118205 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

You are a fricking idiot.

There is real time monitoring on every outfall and that shite is audited like crazy. Daily samples being audited by independent labs.




So are you telling me there isn't any type of pipeline by Dow that is under the levee and goes into the Mississippi River in which waste comes out of and goes into the river?

Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
10832 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

So are you telling me there isn't any type of pipeline by Dow that is under the levee and goes into the Mississippi River in which waste comes out of and goes into the river?



That isn't seriously monitored? Not no, but hell no.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
118205 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

That isn't seriously monitored? Not no, but hell no.



Okay, so its monitored.. But is it not pumping waste into the river?
Posted by WildManGoose
Member since Nov 2005
4584 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

waste
Waste is simply something that's not going to be used again. It doesn't mean it's toxic or a pollutant.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
25234 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

propaganda piece from the OP


In my defense, I posted an Advocate article (think it was The Advocate) a week or two ago that gave quite a contrary view to this one in regards to the petrochem industry in Louisiana. I think my downvote to upvote ratio was 5 to 1 or something like that.

Certainly I have my personal leanings and thoughts, but I do like seeing how the broad range of folks here view things, and since the PoliBoard leans WAY one direction overall, I figure OT Board might be a better sample size.
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 2:57 pm
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:54 pm to
This study brought to you by the benevolent O&G industry
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
10832 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Okay, so its monitored.. But is it not pumping waste into the river?


Of course its pumping waste water into the river. But its been treated (cleaned) to certain specifications and those specifications are monitored and that monitoring data goes thru a shitload of red tape at the federal level. You want to worry about what Dow is doing to the environment, worry about accidental spills/discharges due to poor maintenance, faulty construction, or mother nature.
Posted by Turf Taint
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2021
6010 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:58 pm to
Lots of truth in your post.

And (not Or)…chloroprene concentrations in air in St John the Baptist parish, known drinking water risks, and exposure to various cancer causing chemicals in the petrochemical industry that is prevalent in River Parishes.

Grew up in LaPlace. While it’s my anecdotal experience, most of people I know w/cancer have origins there. I moved all over and know many more people than those who are from there. In particular thyroid cancer for whatever reason.

And the lifestyles, on avg, are contributors to your point. But there is dense cancer in my network of people who hail from the area, many of which work in petrochemical industry in various roles
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
74609 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 3:09 pm to
quote:


Since the propaganda piece from the OP didn’t bother to research any other stance than that supported by the LA Chemical Association, here’s a study that concludes otherwise


There is hard data of cancer rates from census tracts that it publicly available. They decided not to use that data instead opting for a questionnaire.
Posted by Tigris
Cloud Cuckoo Land
Member since Jul 2005
12883 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

‘Cancer Alley’
quote:

a term that has been used to identify the 85-mile Mississippi River Industrial Corridor that runs from Baton Rouge to New Orleans


From what I remember this term goes back to the late 80's when here was an effort to unionize BASF in Geismar. The union organizers put up billboards along I-10 saying "Welcome to Cancer Alley" in order to put heat on the industry. Nice. Later Greenpeace picked up on it with banners when they shut down the "New" bridge as a stunt that really pissed off people. The term "Cancer Alley" isn't based on anything more than propaganda.

There was an effort to unionize the plant where I worked. It failed (like it did at BASF) so a union activist turned in my plant for environmental violations. It led to a raid by the FBI, DEQ, and EPA. The only problem was the activist claims were bogus. And of course the FBI couldn't admit that so they investigated for a couple of more years until a scapegoat was found in order to make the whole circus go away.

Since anecdotes seem to count more than data on this site; I've worked in and for plants for 4 decades. I know of three plant workers who died of cancer, and FAR more than that who have never been near a chemical plant. It probably depends somewhat on the type of plant, though. In the industry I work in the only real carcinogen is asbestos in pipe insulation, but asbestos was everywhere when those plants were built. My house in Baton Rouge had asbestos siding. Studies have shown roughly the same cancer rate in "Cancer Alley" as the rest of Louisiana. Louisiana has a relatively high cancer rate when compared to the rest of the US. Louisiana also has one of the least healthy lifestyles, so that's no surprise.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
12302 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 4:54 pm to
Older PhD Chemist noted that for decades the poor in Mississippi would register a Louisiana address to get cancer treatment because there wasn't much for them there.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
74609 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

From what I remember this term goes back to the late 80's when here was an effort to unionize BASF in Geismar


You aren't wrong.

The signs read "Welcome to Geismar, La. Gateway to Cancer Alley"
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
37183 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

I was curious about that too so i googled it and found a DeSoto Parish Helath Profile showing they have 3 Superfund sites
I'm sure the OP will argue that's not relevant.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
11961 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

Go behind the levee when the water is low (which has been years since it was low enough to see) and see the shite that is pumping into the Mississippi river



So you spent a lot of time in your younger days just hanging out next to the outfalls at major chemical plants and refineries?

Even if that were true, there’s no way you can visually tell whether that water is any dirtier than the water in the Mississippi River.

ETA:
quote:

But is it not pumping waste into the river?

It’s not like a cartoon where there is green sludge coming out of a culvert.

What they pump into the river is waste water. Which, for most plants, is primarily made up of water that originally came out of the river, after it’s used in boilers and cooling towers. There is process waste water, but the solids, organics, etc. are removed by biological treatment systems. The sludge waste from those treatment system (which consists mostly of waste-eating microorganisms) is hauled off and used in landfills to speed up biodegradation.

The primary concern for chemical plants and refineries is biological oxygen demand, which is a catch-all for compounds in the waste water stream that will serve as food for microorganisms in the river - leading to a drop in oxygen levels as these microorganisms feed and reproduce. You can’t “see” BOD. Even if you could, many plants in South Louisiana actually discharge water that’s cleaner than the river itself.

There are cases where some chemical plants have been caught discharging solid waste, but it’s rare. And your description makes me think you’re just making shite up about the “shite pumping into the river” that you’ve supposedly seen.
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 6:21 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram