Started By
Message

The myth of ‘Cancer Alley’

Posted on 8/24/21 at 11:57 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21251 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 11:57 am
quote:

Over the years, science has continued to show that the “Cancer Alley” moniker – a term that has been used to identify the 85-mile Mississippi River Industrial Corridor that runs from Baton Rouge to New Orleans – is patently false, according to industry leaders. Nevertheless, environmental activists continue to incorrectly claim that rates of cancer along one of the largest petrochemical hubs in the nation are higher than the state average.

In its most recent volume of “Cancer in Louisiana,” the Louisiana Tumor Registry (LTR) again points out that cancer incidence and death rates in the Industrial Corridor are at, and in some instances below, those in the rest of the state.



quote:

“The facts clearly do not support the criticism heaped on our industry,” Greg Bowser, president and chief executive officer for the Louisiana Chemical Association said. “As one of the largest contributors to the state’s economy, it is imperative that we tell the truth about chemical manufacturing and work together to combat the real reasons why health outcomes in our state are so poor.”

Longstanding concerns about cancer rates along the Industrial Corridor have made national headlines as part of an environmental justice movement. Even President Joe Biden, who has made tackling environmental racism one of his top priorities, called out Louisiana’s “Cancer Alley” in one of his first speeches as president.


quote:

LTR is an internationally recognized entity charged with cataloging population-based reported cases of cancer in the state to support cancer research, control and prevention. Its most recent report, “Cancer in Louisiana Volume 35,” is based on data collected between 2013 and 2017, and the findings are consistent with others dating back decades.

While Louisiana’s cancer rates are higher than the national average, other factors contribute to these numbers. According to federal health data, factors involving lifestyle and family history significantly influence cancer risk more than environmental exposure. In every measure of contributing risk factors, including smoking, obesity, physical inactivity and access to healthcare, Louisiana largely ranks worse than the national average.



quote:

The Industrial Corridor is home to numerous petrochemical plants that anchor Louisiana’s economy, support tens of thousands of good-paying jobs and fuel the state’s budget.

A study by Loren C. Scott and Associates reported that in 2017, the chemical industry generated more than $1.1 billion in taxes and fees for the state treasury; $950 million went to local governments, paying salaries for 40 percent of the state’s approximately 20,000 public school teachers.

Bowser, whose association includes 66 member companies operating more than 100 sites throughout Louisiana, said continuing to reference the Industrial Corridor as “Cancer Alley” is not rooted in fact and is detrimental to the state.

“Propagating the myth of ‘Cancer Alley’ is not only dangerous but is an affront to the people of our great state who work tirelessly to make the industry cleaner, safer and more efficient on a daily basis,” Bowser said.

Kim Chatelain is a freelance journalist and a former NOLA.com / New Orleans Times Picayune news staffer.


LINK /
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:04 pm to
I get in a back and forth at least once a month on Cancer Alley and why the terms is just...well...bullshite.

Blaming petrochemical for the increased cancer in Louisiana is glossing over the actual reason of shite health, lack of education, and just poor.

40 years of Cancer Alley and they can't link actual clusters or increased cases. Only increased risk factors.
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 12:07 pm
Posted by back9Tiger
Mandeville, LA.
Member since Nov 2005
14143 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:04 pm to
This is very simple... it is out of state actors that are pushing the global climate agenda trying to destroy industry. They do not care if you lose your job and your family goes homeless, you are collateral damage.

I've been in the industry over 20 years, know people in plants the entire time, have yet to hear any issues with cancer. You'd think if that was true, employees who are onsite daily, would been seeing it. Miraculously they just jump from the employees to poor blacks.

Lies, lies and more lies.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164137 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:07 pm to
People in Louisiana get cancer because they’re fat, drinkers, and smokers at the highest rates in the US. It has way more to do with that than some plants on the river.
Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
4273 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:12 pm to
What a terrible article. Statements by the chemical industry and its attorney saying cancer alley is a myth, no actual data to refute the myth, and then reminding everyone how important the chemical industry is to the state.

Cancer alley may well be a myth. I have no idea. Are cancer rates in that area of the state higher than other areas with similarly poor education and comorbidity rates? Maybe, but this article won’t tell you.

Probably because it’s bought and paid for PR and not actual journalism.
Posted by BHS78
Member since May 2017
2057 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:12 pm to
My Doctor has been saying this for 20 years. Cancer is not more prevalent than in other areas. La has a higher death rate because of poverty and people won't go to the doctor is the real problem.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Statements by the chemical industry and its attorney saying cancer alley is a myth, no actual data to refute the myth,


How do you refute a myth? Of all the studies done none have found actual higher rates of cancer.

quote:

Cancer alley may well be a myth. I have no idea. Are cancer rates in that area of the state higher than other areas with similarly poor education and comorbidity rates? Maybe, but this article won’t tell you.


They aren't. In most cases, the rates are lower.
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 12:15 pm
Posted by lsu5803tiger
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Member since Feb 2006
1626 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:15 pm to
Is it ok to trust this science? Or no?
Posted by thedrumdoctor
Gonzales,La
Member since Sep 2016
871 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

environmental racism

Literally what is this?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:20 pm to
It would be better defined by environmental classism, but that doesn't have as good of a ring to it.

Build where poor people live. Makes it less likely they have political connections or ability to resist.

It isn't just industry that does this, it is a fact of this world. Being poor sucks.
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 12:21 pm
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21251 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

it’s bought and paid for PR and not actual journalism


And what's John George's (The Advocate's) blatant attacks on the petrochemical industry called? Is that real journalism?

ETA: I see your reasoning now. At least the on-line article could have provided a link to the LSU Health page.
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 12:29 pm
Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
4273 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Of all the studies done none have found actual higher rates of cancer.


This is the kind of statement with support that should be in the article and would make it worthwhile. I’m just pointing out this article doesn’t actually say anything to support the headline. It’s lazy “journalism”
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21251 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:27 pm to
LSU Health Louisiana Tumor Registry
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 12:28 pm
Posted by PrimetimeDaBoss
Swag City, USA
Member since Oct 2008
7144 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:28 pm to
How much did they pay you to write that?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:30 pm to
From the article

quote:

In its most recent volume of “Cancer in Louisiana,” the Louisiana Tumor Registry (LTR) again points out that cancer incidence and death rates in the Industrial Corridor are at, and in some instances below, those in the rest of the state.
Posted by Rust Cohle
Baton rouge
Member since Mar 2014
1944 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:31 pm to
I feel confident that it’s overstated, and connections are misaligned. In the YouTube video why Louisiana stays poor, they demonstrate that we have the highest income producing company in the state, and some of the highest in the country, which is also in the lowest income ZIP Code of the state. They suggest if they pay the same amount of taxes that that company does in our neighboring states, Texas and Mississippi, those ZIP Codes would have increased health, education, and wealth.
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 12:33 pm
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113951 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

People in Louisiana get cancer because they’re fat, drinkers, and smokers at the highest rates in the US. It has way more to do with that than some plants on the river.



There is no doubt about this, but when I see the shite pollution these plants pump out... Go behind the levee when the water is low (which has been years since it was low enough to see) and see the shite that is pumping into the Mississippi river.. I can't help but think that all of that pollution isn't having any type of impact on the environment and anything that is living around it.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21251 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

How much did they pay you to write that?


No one should be paying me to write newspaper articles. That would be poor judgment and wasteful spending.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Go behind the levee when the water is low (which has been years since it was low enough to see) and see the shite that is pumping into the Mississippi river.


You are a fricking idiot.

There is real time monitoring on every outfall and that shite is audited like crazy. Daily samples being audited by independent labs.
Posted by Jones
Member since Oct 2005
90511 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:48 pm to
Nah man it's just like the movies! Big bad chemical plant is just dumping barrels of toxic sludge into the waterway.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram