- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The house that sold for $800K over asking price speaks to the inequity of California
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:18 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
*not in the area you work
My bank account tells a much different story.
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
that's a major reason why there is a housing shortage in these areas. most affluent areas in CA refuse to allow a Houston-like sprawl
This doesn't make any sense. How to you not allow a private land owner to subdivide his property
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:20 am to Sayre
quote:
And more than that have moved into CA. Net migration is positive.
actual there was a net negative of 1.1M in that timeframe
quote:
About 5 million Californians left between 2004 and 2013. Roughly 3.9 million people came here from other states during that period, for a net population loss of more than 1 million people.
The trend resulted in a net loss of about $26 billion in annual income.
About 600,000 California residents left for Texas, which drew more Californians than any other state. Roughly 350,000 people came from Texas to California.
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:21 am to crazycubes
quote:
How to you not allow a private land owner to subdivide his property
zoning and permitting, brah
the authoritarian tool of the local government
plus local building codes drive up the cost
this is all on top of the price of land and construction costs that are inflated
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:23 am to Sayre
There is no denying that they have some serious issues to face in the coming decades. But from everything I can see, there's no slow down in the building boom the tech companies are fronting.
Whether it's the Google campus I mentioned, or the Central Wolfe campus Apple is going to rent, or all the data centers going up.
Actually, the entire West Coast is a forest of tower cranes, from border to border.
That's a problem I imagine a lot of other places would like to have.
Whether it's the Google campus I mentioned, or the Central Wolfe campus Apple is going to rent, or all the data centers going up.
Actually, the entire West Coast is a forest of tower cranes, from border to border.
That's a problem I imagine a lot of other places would like to have.
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:25 am to Street Hawk
It makes no sense why a ranch style home should be there. The area needs to build vertical to support the demand. And why would companies flock to a location where they have to pay their workers tremendous amounts of money just to survive? As a shareholder I’d push for them to locate to an affordable area and save on labor costs
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
zoning and permitting, brah
the authoritarian tool of the local government
plus local building codes drive up the cost
this is all on top of the price of land and construction costs that are inflated
Is that worse than the unfetterred development that much of Louisiana or a city like Houston have allowed?
When you live in a almost paradise environment like much of California, with all these people, if you don't keep a clamp on things, it'll get out of hand in a heartbeat.
The skyline in CA still amazes me. You can see the mountains without having to look past a forest of McDonald and Taco Bell signs on poles. They value their quality of life in that way.
This post was edited on 11/19/17 at 9:27 am
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:28 am to Sayre
quote:
There is no denying that they have some serious issues to face in the coming decades. But from everything I can see, there's no slow down in the building boom the tech companies are fronting.
i said Big Tech is one of our primary national economic drivers. i'm not hating on Big Tech
the problem is going to be how the state and local governments respond. the article wants them to steal a bigger chunk of that industrial economy to spread it around. that's going to be a bad thing
just look at this quote form the article
quote:
“Every day, people are on the road for an hour, two hours, each way. We’re wasting so much talent and skill and the disparity in income is just ridiculous,” said Clark. “The government’s job is defense, and building roads and schools. But another part of the government’s job is income distribution and too much of it has gone to the super-wealthy.”
that's the meta issue
that kind of thinking is insane. like i said. killing the goose that lays golden eggs
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:29 am to Sayre
Another thing about that rent I pay. By law, the rent after a lease renewal in San Jose can't go up more than 3%. Mine went up 2% to $2550 when I renewed in September. I'll manage, somehow.
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:31 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
It makes no sense why a ranch style home should be there. The area needs to build vertical to support the demand. And why would companies flock to a location where they have to pay their workers tremendous amounts of money just to survive? As a shareholder I’d push for them to locate to an affordable area and save on labor costs
Because that's where they want live, shareholders included.
It's really, really nice there. People are willing to pay more to live there, and they're not as likely to move with a company, they'll just switch companies. There's that much competition for their talents.
When a ranch like that sells, that close to Apple, you can bet it's a big wig with every intention to replace that ranch with something much grander. They're just buying the lot.
This post was edited on 11/19/17 at 9:33 am
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:33 am to Sayre
quote:
Is that worse than the unfetterred development that much of Louisiana or a city like Houston have allowed?
depends on who you're asking
worse for the super wealthy execs in Big Tech? no
worse for the middle and upper middle class workers across all industries in the area? big yes
quote:
When you live in a almost paradise environment like much of California, with all these people, if you don't keep a clamp on things, it'll get out of hand in a heartbeat.
this discussion tree is about why there isn't an adequate supply of homes (which is driving up the costs of homes like the one in OP)
you're showing the exact philosophy that is leading to a housing shortage in the area
quote:
The skyline in CA still amazes me. You can see the mountains without having to look past a forest of McDonald and Taco Bell signs on poles. They value their quality of life in that way.
and they pay for it, which means many people who work in the area can't afford to live there (in response to the article in OP)
like one of my early posts said, CA wants it all. they want a booming economy, affordable housing, AND pristine exclusivity
that's impossible. you can get 2 of those 3 but not all 3
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:35 am to Sayre
quote:
By law, the rent after a lease renewal in San Jose can't go up more than 3%.
rent control is another symptom of ensuring low supply of housing. that's another reason rents/costs increase overall
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:36 am to Sayre
You can see it just driving around there. Tesla's are a dime a dozen, as are mega dollar Porsches, S-class Mercs, and any other zooty car you care to name. Affluence draws more affluence.
It's a bummer for the service industry employees, but it's still a really nice place to live in most ways.
I still can't get used to the almost total lack of bugs. That's really weird for someone from Louisiana.
It's a bummer for the service industry employees, but it's still a really nice place to live in most ways.
I still can't get used to the almost total lack of bugs. That's really weird for someone from Louisiana.
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
rent control is another symptom of ensuring low supply of housing. that's another reason rents/costs increase overall
It keeps my rent affordable, and ensures that you can't be priced out of the market when the lease is up. It's sure not slowing down people snapping up properties to rent out for income.
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:39 am to Sayre
quote:
It keeps my rent affordable,
yes it incentivizes hoarding of the supply and disincentivizes the profit of future developments (where they'll have to start with an initially insane price to ensure they can keep up with the market). again, i'm not talking about YOUR situation. i'm talking about the general issues, specifically as they relate to the argument in the article in OP
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
depends on who you're asking
Lets ask all the people that have been flooded in the last several years.
I'm sure the people in Houston that knew they were't in a flood zone, only to find out they were in a flood plain from the reservoir they live near are thrilled.
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
yes it incentivizes hoarding of the supply and disincentivizes the profit of future developments (where they'll have to start with an initially insane price to ensure they can keep up with the market). again, i'm not talking about YOUR situation. i'm talking about the general issues, specifically as they relate to the argument in the article in OP
Explain the massive amount of development there that is is directly contrary to that. Even the non-union residential electrical contractors are swamped.
This post was edited on 11/19/17 at 9:55 am
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:46 am to Sayre
everyone lives in a "flood zone". the assignment deals with the risk involved. what you're calling a "flood zone" is just the designated area that requires certain flood insurance (and received federal subsidies) due to the risk involved
and, those are federal designations based on the NFIP and/or requirements of banks who offer mortgages for the properties
that's not a local/state issue
and, those are federal designations based on the NFIP and/or requirements of banks who offer mortgages for the properties
that's not a local/state issue
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:49 am to Street Hawk
I'm sure the sellers really give a shite. 
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:49 am to SlowFlowPro
From what my sister, who lives in Friendswood, was explaining it to me, lots of people knew they lived in a flood zone. But they have separate areas called flood plains, there are only susceptible to flooding if they release water from a overloaded reservoir. Lots of people didn't know they live in one of those areas, apparently.
Popular
Back to top


0





