- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The craziest/best poker call I've ever seen (270k pot)
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No.
You're using words and you don't know what they mean.
Even Gus Hansen and isildur took a while to blow their whole rolls
If someone could always win at poker you would see them on the Forbes 400
The richest poker players made money from sponsorships, not playing poker
Says it all
2
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're using words and you don't know what they mean.
Bingo.
And like I said, even if gman blew his entire roll, there would be a line of people waiting to hand him their money to keep playing.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:42 am to Caraway Rye
quote:
Poker is a game of chance
Poker is a game of math
quote:
You can advantage play only to the level that you get a random draw of cards that is better than the next person
Oh my god
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:42 am to BestBanker
quote:so basically she's just an idiot because she's female. That's what you're going with?
And yet, she won that hand with a jack. You're missing the big point about it didn't make sense: It's a woman
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:42 am to BestBanker
Ugh
This post was edited on 10/1/22 at 8:43 am
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:42 am to Caraway Rye
quote:
The richest poker players made money from sponsorships, not playing poker
Sponsor money is variance free.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Poker is a game of math
No
Its a game of chance
Its a completely random dealing of the cards
Someone could hypothetically get quads a hundred times in a row or only be dealt 3 high a hundred times in a row
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:44 am to Caraway Rye
Yes, there’s variance involved in the short term, but to deduce poker to a “game of chance” is a bad take. The best poker players in the world (for the most part) practice bankroll management that doesn’t allow them to lose their whole bankroll when they’re on a downswing. There are also thousands of people that make enough money to not have to work outside of poker. Amazing that it’s only a game of chance.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:46 am to The Torch
quote:its not that she won with J high. It's that she called off her stack with it and there's so few hands in his range that she could put him on and still win.
I don't play - so she beat him with Jack High ?
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:50 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
its not that she won with J high. It's that she called off her stack with it and there's so few hands in his range that she could put him on and still win.
Then when everyone at the table was like wtf is going on she gave a nonsensical explanation on why she called. Then came back 30 minutes later and changed her story which caused the person that lost to believe he was cheated
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:50 am to lance814
I quit trying to explain the difference in poker compared to other gambling games years ago. It's all luck to most people. And that's fine. I like playing against those people.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:52 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
I quit trying to explain the difference in poker compared to other gambling games years ago. It's all luck to most people. And that's fine. I like playing against those people.
You still havent explained how you have made infinite amounts of money with your foolproof plan of bilking morons out of money playing poker
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:52 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
so basically she's just an idiot because she's female. That's what you're going with?
I mean honestly, it’s the most likely explanation right?
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:54 am to EarlyCuyler3
The actual math, some articles have it wrong:
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:55 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:she does have nice funbags not gonna lie
mean honestly, it’s the most likely explanation right?
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:57 am to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
Some of you clearly don't understand. Let's try to dumb it down for you.
quote:
That team decides to go for it on 4th down in that exact situation. Could they end up getting the first down? Sure. It doesn't make it completely reckless and stupid.
I’ll dumb it down even further for you poker expert. Is the team going for it on 4th down in that situation cheating?
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:57 am to Caraway Rye
quote:
Caraway Rye
Like trying to explain math to a goldfish.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:58 am to Caraway Rye
quote:
You still havent explained how you have made infinite amounts of money with your foolproof plan of bilking morons out of money playing poker
Winning infinite amounts of money don’t make you qualified to speak on the situation. I’m an above average poker player, but that’s merely bc the average “poker player” is awful. I am, however, sharp enough to know if a guy like you were to sit at the poker table, you just asoon throw your money on the floor. The beauty of the game is you might win sometimes, but over the long haul, you’d be lighting money on fire.
This post was edited on 10/1/22 at 8:59 am
Posted on 10/1/22 at 8:59 am to lance814
He'd run hot and get lucky and then lecture the table in why he's so good. 
Posted on 10/1/22 at 9:00 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
The actual math, some articles have it wrong:
Yea, that’s because hustler’s live stream accounts for the cards already folded. If she knew his hand only, she’d be a slight favorite.
Page 9 of 38
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News