- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki - Animated
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:39 pm to grizzlylongcut
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:39 pm to grizzlylongcut
Well, the concept has been around formally at least since the 15th century, so your personal feelings don’t mean too much.
0
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:40 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Because I wasn’t the one that originally asserted that it’s a crime. It’s on you, prosecutor, to back up your opinion.
Are you not able to distinguish the two separate concepts being discussed?
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:42 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
An attack on a military target.
So was Hiroshima and Nagasaki, both were high value targets, with large civilian populations. If Japan could have reached mainland, they would have done the same. We know this because they sent air balloons to indiscriminately bomb the mainland, even though it failed.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:43 pm to Mo Jeaux
The invasion of Japan likely would have resulted in the death of more Japanese citizens than the atomic bombs. Now, you can argue the second bomb being too much, but the end result ultimately saved more lives.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:44 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
quote:
war crime
No. Such. Thing.
That may be your personal opinion but if you ever served in the military you are aware that the UCMJ and The War Crimes Act disagree and you could be prosecuted for relying on your opinion.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:44 pm to philter
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:45 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Are you not able to distinguish the two separate concepts being discussed?
You called it a war crime, I asked you to explain your reasoning, you have yet to do so.
I think you’re the one that is having trouble here. Many people have asked you to back up your assertion, and you refuse to. Why?
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:47 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
You called it a war crime, I asked you to explain your reasoning, you have yet to do so.
I think you’re the one that is having trouble here. Many people have asked you to back up your assertion, and you refuse to. Why?
I’ve already explained why, in my personal opinion, it was.
You’ve stated that there is no such thing as a war crime. That’s what I’ve asked you to explain.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:47 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
What’s a war crime? Please, tell us what a war crime is.
I never said it was a war crime.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:49 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
You’re not making any sense.
Pot calling kettle black. You haven't made any sense from your first post in this thread but here you are wasting a whole Saturday posting your nonsense.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:51 pm to FLObserver
quote:
You haven't made any sense from your first post in this thread
No, you just don’t agree with what I’ve said, which is of course fine. The problem is that you, and others, are so insecure for some reason that you have to lash out at what I’ve said.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:56 pm to Mo Jeaux
void
This post was edited on 7/24/23 at 8:33 am
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:57 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
No, you just don’t agree with what I’ve said, which is of course fine. The problem is that you, and others, are so insecure for some reason that you have to lash out at what I’ve said.
Same could be said for your responses to some valid points posted in this thread. You are definitely giving off that angry Dem vibe.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 1:58 pm to TexasTiger33
No. You can go frick yourself though, you stupid cocksucker.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 2:01 pm to TexasTiger33
When you care enough to send the very best.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 2:01 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
I’ve already explained why, in my personal opinion, it was.
Not really, though. You’ve posted smug arse remarks to everyone but you haven’t, yet explained a) what a war crime is, and b) how what the U.S. did was a war crime.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 2:09 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
No. Such. Thing.
What do you mean by this? Adding periods behind every word for impact does not add to the legitimacy of your claim. There have been numerous cases held, recently Milosevic is 1999 at the Hauge.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 2:17 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
That may be your personal opinion but if you ever served in the military you are aware that the UCMJ and The War Crimes Act disagree and you could be prosecuted for relying on your opinion.
Yes, I served. And yes, I’m aware of both things. Does not mean that there’s such thing as a war crime.
Posted on 7/22/23 at 2:19 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
What do you mean by this?
I mean that there’s no such thing as war crime. It’s a ridiculous concept. And if there is such thing as a “war crime” the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren’t war crimes. Sorry.
This post was edited on 7/22/23 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 7/22/23 at 2:21 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
You’ve posted smug arse remarks to everyone
I’ve posted smug arse remarks to those who have posted smug arse remarks to me.
Page 9 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News