Started By
Message

re: Sword attack at Swedish school

Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:18 am to
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
38241 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:18 am to
quote:

let's exploit this tragedy to denigrate the anti-gun people!"



well people like you and Sir Winston pretty much invite denigrating when you claim mass assaults never occur in European countries because of their "sophisticated" gun control laws. Yet this story and others like it (Je Suis Charlie, sound familiar?) indicate otherwise.
Additionally, anti-gun zealots who blame an inanimate object rather than the shooter deserve denigrating for their poor logic.
Posted by BruslyTiger
Waiting on 420...
Member since Oct 2003
4806 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Hope you're all happy now.
Yeah, I'm pretty happy. Just not about that...
Posted by RATeamWannabe
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
26018 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:35 am to
quote:

TheOcean


quote:

hypocrites


Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
31772 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:36 am to
And they had to use gun to stop him?
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:49 am to


Looks like a heavily Muslim area of Sweeden
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:50 am to
quote:

well people like you and Sir Winston pretty much invite denigrating when you claim mass assaults never occur in European countries because of their "sophisticated" gun control laws.


It's true! If this were an area where guns were easily obtained the death count would have been 10 or 15 or 20 instead of 2 or 3.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135044 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Looks like a heavily Muslim area of Sweeden



Imagine that.

Probably an "honor killing".
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135044 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 9:49 am to
quote:

true! If this were an area where guns were easily obtained the death count would have been 10 or 15 or 20 instead of 2 or 3.



Except when the facts come out it will probably be a person with very specific targets and not some sort of mass murdering madman.
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
38241 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 10:10 am to
quote:




It's true! If this were an area where guns were easily obtained the death count would have been 10 or 15 or 20 instead of 2 or 3.



But but but, this sort of thing doesn't happen where there's gun control, right? It's only in America where those blood thirsty yanks are clinging to their guns where kids get killed, no? Are is it Better if it's just 2 or 3? Cause now you're just arguing numbers. Guess that depends on if you're one of the 2 or 3 right?
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23317 posts
Posted on 10/22/15 at 10:40 am to
quote:

One person killed and 2 wounded is not a "mass" anything.


Yes, it is. The definition of "mass" is three or more victims with no "cooling off period". It's a LEO term, and you don't get to redefine it just because you're not intelligent enough to understand it.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram