- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/18/26 at 3:47 pm to deeprig9
quote:
I'm gonna go ahead and say that saving $100/m on your electric bill by using a $70k car has an ROI of 58 years. That's if the car and battery last 58 years.
What’s the ROI on your car?
Posted on 6/18/26 at 3:51 pm to billjamin
In the overall scheme of things, the batteries help level out the demand from the power plants and that alone as much as doubles the effective output of power generation if enough batteries are involved.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 3:56 pm to wallowinit
quote:
In the overall scheme of things, the batteries help level out the demand from the power plants and that alone as much as doubles the effective output of power generation if enough batteries are involved.
It's also very efficient because there's no transmission loss. Which offsets the roundtrip loss. Being behind the meter has a lot of benefits for grid stability.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 4:20 pm to TheIndulger
quote:
What’s the ROI on your car?
I paid $25,000 for it in 2015. If I had relied on rideshare at a $100 a week budget, it's 4.8 years. Then if we add in maintenance, repairs, insurance, gas, it's more like 10 years. So as of 2026, I'm just now about to roll over to 160k miles, I am in the green.
Also, it does have 120V outlet so I can use it as a generator in emergencies, burning sweet beautiful crude which is widely available. I wonder if I idled in the driveway and plugged that back into my grid what the cost savings would be on my electric bill vs what I burn in gas. Hard to compare apples to oranges though, I'm not metered with peak hours vs non-peak.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 4:24 pm to Fat and Happy
quote:
I’m gonna go ahead and say those batteries are not set up for that with pulling a much higher amount of energy.
I’m betting the batteries don’t last long and have to be replaced
Under acceleration a Tesla can easily put out over 100 kW. For comparison a home with typical 200 amp service can draw 48 kW max. Driving down the highway at constant speed a Tesla draws probably 20 kW. That's enough to run about 3 5-ton AC units at the same time, and the car battery wouldn't be under much strain.
Now, if *every* kWh that the house burns goes through the car first, then yeah that would chew up the charge cycles. But the batteries can handle it. And for this use here and there it probably won't make much of a dent vs. actually driving the car.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 4:31 pm to Korkstand
To put it in perspective a LR Model 3 has the equivalent of 5.5 PowerWalls. I run 4 PWs at the ranch and that runs 2 houses, a work shop and barn. I've been off grid for weeks at a time with no issues.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 4:32 pm to deeprig9
quote:This is nonsensical. You didn't buy a $70k generator, you bought a car. Using it for backup power and saving a few bucks in the process are bonuses.
I'm gonna go ahead and say that saving $100/m on your electric bill by using a $70k car has an ROI of 58 years. That's if the car and battery last 58 years.
I paid $10k for a generator, what's my ROI on that? There is no return. The return is negative because it costs 10 times more to use it vs. grid power.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 4:33 pm to Shexter
This is absolute wear and tear on a battery.
You only get so many charges.
You only get so many charges.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 4:35 pm to Fat and Happy
quote:
I’m gonna go ahead and say those batteries are not set up for that with pulling a much higher amount of energy.
Their batteries are supposedly capable of up to 200kW while driving, so that shouldn't be an issue. The limiting factor will be the charger/breaker. The Tesla home chargers have adjustable settings, and will use Wifi to tell the car how many amps it can draw based on those settings. So if the charger is connected to a 40A, 2 pole breaker, it tells the car to draw 32A max (80% of the breaker rating to avoid overheating issues). 32A at 240V is 7.6kW. I'd assume that the same communication can occur if the car is charging the house, and 7.6kW is a decent amount of power.
quote:
I’m betting the batteries don’t last long and have to be replaced
I was thinking the same thing, but someone smarter than us has probably done the math on this and figured that it was worth it. To handle it efficiently, the system probably needs to monitor how much power the entire home is drawing. That way the car can provide power when the home's load is fairly high (cooling/electric heat is on), then does nothing (or charges) when it cycles off. That would help limit battery degradation.
The simpler solution is already available in Teslas. You can plug it in whenever you get home, but tell it to only charge during off-peak hours. I haven't played around with the setting as I have no interest in using it, so I'm not sure if it's easy to have those charging hours automatically adjust based on time of year.
I'll dig into it when I'm off the clock, but I'm curious to see how the Tesla charger is able to sync the voltage that it supplies with the electrical utility's. It can be dangerous if the waves of both sources aren't at the same phase, as the panelboard can potentially see much higher voltages than 240V.
This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:05 pm to THRILLHO
The Tesla chargers aren't capable of managing this. You need something like the Gateway to do it. That would have dual current transformers (consumption and export). Then the computer would do the work of frequency balancing or sometimes intentionally frequency shifting to turn the system off.
And regarding increased degradation, it's minimal. I don't even model in VPP cycles into my degradation schedule. The similar US programs aren't hitting the batteries very hard or often. Remember that these are the exact same batteries that we use on home energy storage and those cycle daily and have a ten year 70% warranty and a 37.8MWh useful life on only 13.5kWh of storage.
And regarding increased degradation, it's minimal. I don't even model in VPP cycles into my degradation schedule. The similar US programs aren't hitting the batteries very hard or often. Remember that these are the exact same batteries that we use on home energy storage and those cycle daily and have a ten year 70% warranty and a 37.8MWh useful life on only 13.5kWh of storage.
Popular
Back to top


0











