- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stepmom of atlanta officer rolfe was fired from her HR job today
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:10 pm to TigerMyth36
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:10 pm to TigerMyth36
Again..this has nothing to do with employment at will and whether they can fire her. Yes, they are POS for telling somebody their job is ok, having them go on leave and firing them without a reason.
The lawsuit will be because they defamed her name all over the place saying she created a hostile work environment, violated company policy, made employees feel uncomfortable. Those are hella accusations to make agains somebody in HR. They didn't have to post or actually say anything. Since her sons issue, she hasn't even been at work! They have nothing to back up those allegations and literally have that as the only thing on their entire company website. LINK
The lawsuit will be because they defamed her name all over the place saying she created a hostile work environment, violated company policy, made employees feel uncomfortable. Those are hella accusations to make agains somebody in HR. They didn't have to post or actually say anything. Since her sons issue, she hasn't even been at work! They have nothing to back up those allegations and literally have that as the only thing on their entire company website. LINK
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:12 pm to TROLA
quote:
Unless she has an employment contract
This. If I'm at her level of a company (C or Director level), I am DEMANDING an employment contract.
And I'd probably get it too.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:13 pm to TigerMyth36
So there’s no case for wrongful termination ?
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:13 pm to fightin tigers
Somebody attacked their website and sent thousands of emails to colleges email lists at 5 major universities with a nasty preapproved loan form from their website.
The lambasting they have taken on Linked-in, Twitter, and Faceboody has been pretty one sided despite the efforts to delete posts.
The screwed up pretty good. They could have just parted ways and said nothing. They could just take the posts with her name in them down.
The lambasting they have taken on Linked-in, Twitter, and Faceboody has been pretty one sided despite the efforts to delete posts.
The screwed up pretty good. They could have just parted ways and said nothing. They could just take the posts with her name in them down.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:15 pm to Prominentwon
Correct. Their is no cause in Georgia in this case. She is not in a protected class and the reason for termination will not be protected. We are getting on dangerous grounds when your political affiliate can be cause for job termination which is closely where this one is given that the "social media post" in question was actually a private message shared by a lady running for Congress.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:16 pm to RTRinTampa
quote:
I hope everyone sees that the party of diversity is everything but when it comes to thought.
Been pointing that exact fact out to lefties for years, starting with the 2016 Republican and Democrat Presidential candidates. Dems- nothing but left and far left. Pubs- everything from centrist (Huntsman) to fairly far right (Bachman and Huckabee). Leftists heads exploded.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:22 pm to RealDawg
This will be a federal action through EEOC.
EEOC will not take sides, but will allow her to proceed with a suit (as they do in 99+% of the cases filed to them). The suit will be filed and then it will likely go to mediation with the expectation by the judge that the parties will come to an amicable settlement. You must go through EEOC before you can file suit.
My wife (no pics) has had to do this twice as a female manager in a male-dominated industry. Sexual harassment is prevalent in the industry in which she works; the companies are all incestuous and swap management employees constantly. Nobody is ever really punished.
EEOC will not take sides, but will allow her to proceed with a suit (as they do in 99+% of the cases filed to them). The suit will be filed and then it will likely go to mediation with the expectation by the judge that the parties will come to an amicable settlement. You must go through EEOC before you can file suit.
My wife (no pics) has had to do this twice as a female manager in a male-dominated industry. Sexual harassment is prevalent in the industry in which she works; the companies are all incestuous and swap management employees constantly. Nobody is ever really punished.
This post was edited on 6/24/20 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:27 pm to RealDawg
quote:
She is not in a protected class
You sure about that? Seems like she would definitely fit the over 40 protected class.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:29 pm to RealDawg
quote:
She is not in a protected class
The whole "protected class" thing is complete horseshite anyway.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:30 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
As long as she has a clean file, she would win a discrimination lawsuit easily....unless she signed an agreement not to sue because she would lose the massive severance package she received.
After all she is in HR, so she should know all of this...
After all she is in HR, so she should know all of this...
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:36 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
The whole "protected class" thing is complete horseshite anyway.
Interesting...
Explain, please.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:41 pm to RummelTiger
It would definitely apply with her age but there is no apparent evidence that age played any factor in their decision. I guess a twist could be made with her as a mom.
Put it this way, Richard Jewell's attorney says all day long this is a defamation/libel case and an extremely egregious one (unless they come up with some smoking gun that hasn't shown itself). In fact, he is going to participate in the legal team.
Put it this way, Richard Jewell's attorney says all day long this is a defamation/libel case and an extremely egregious one (unless they come up with some smoking gun that hasn't shown itself). In fact, he is going to participate in the legal team.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 9:04 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
Interesting...
Explain, please
In at "at will" state, your employer could terminate your employment for "any" reason as long as it's not for race, religion, etc (protected class). So they could fire you, in theory, because of your race, religion, etc and just say almost anything else. I should have added I meant in at will states.
Plus, protected class impiles that another class doesn't benefit from those protections. Why not.
This post was edited on 6/24/20 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 6/24/20 at 9:12 pm to Spankum
I did my best thinking to try to come up with some explanation where a company parked something like that on their website front page and pinned it on their social media...like what do they gain from that? They could have done one generic post and moved on. They didn't even have to say a word or use her name. Yet days later, they have left all the posts pinned and there sits the front of their website.
They are a mortgage company and people can't even access their customer service and sales options.
They are a mortgage company and people can't even access their customer service and sales options.
This post was edited on 6/24/20 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 6/24/20 at 10:18 pm to RealDawg
Most likely the company will go bankrupt anyway so none of this shite is going to matter. I've never heard of them but I wouldn't be wanting to own a mortgage company or real estate company
This post was edited on 6/24/20 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 6/24/20 at 10:30 pm to RummelTiger
quote:
Interesting...
Explain, please.
Can easily fire a white man for not being good at his job, not so much with protected class people.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 10:36 pm to Aristo
You do realize that even white men belong to certain protected classes, right?
Posted on 6/24/20 at 10:41 pm to RummelTiger
If you don’t by now realize the added protections that certain classes have over a white man, then you just don’t have much corporate experience.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 10:44 pm to RummelTiger
Much easier and less of a headache to fire a poor performing white male than any other person.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 3:52 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Show of support for officer's mom fired
A few people had asked about this and ran across it today.
Apparently, the case against the company will be filed this week with lots of texts from the company showing their support to her (prior to falling to the pressure). Apparently, she was working from home on an agreed leave and was not even in the office (along with half the other staff) when she created a hostile work environment.
Other than being the mom of Officer Rolfe, it appears her "views" that apparently made her a racist and created social injustice was that she supports her son and the police.
Remember when police were the damn heros for enforcing our laws and putting up with the worst parts of our society? shite is out of control.
A few people had asked about this and ran across it today.
Apparently, the case against the company will be filed this week with lots of texts from the company showing their support to her (prior to falling to the pressure). Apparently, she was working from home on an agreed leave and was not even in the office (along with half the other staff) when she created a hostile work environment.
Other than being the mom of Officer Rolfe, it appears her "views" that apparently made her a racist and created social injustice was that she supports her son and the police.
Remember when police were the damn heros for enforcing our laws and putting up with the worst parts of our society? shite is out of control.
This post was edited on 7/21/20 at 3:54 pm
Popular
Back to top

0






