- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/9/25 at 9:41 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
is he a personal injury attorney or not? Because you said he wasn't earlier....now you say he is... Which is it?
The post you quoted is accurate.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 9:48 pm to CarRamrod
First paragraph of the conclusion from the Lafourche Parish District Attorney’s report.
Will you bother to look at that report?
quote:
The report provided to this office by Louisiana State Police has several inconsistencies which were used to base their opinion and conclusion of the crash. The report notes about reviewing the video surveillance which was obtained from Go Bears. The report goes on to state, "The video footage then captures Vehicle 1 abruptly slowing to a sudden stop in the northbound lane. This is an incorrect statement and at no point is Kyren Lacy observed coming to a stop in the northbound lane.
Will you bother to look at that report?
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:09 pm to CarRamrod
That’s not the crash site on your map
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:46 pm to civiltiger07
So Lacy was doing 88 in a no passing zone. But the DA says he wasn't "knowingly " culpable in the death of the Vietnam Vet.
That DA needs to recalled for malfeasance in office. .
That DA needs to recalled for malfeasance in office. .
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:47 pm to WillFerrellisking
You mean that black car by the light post next to the blue tag that says crash site from the LSP video is not the crash site?
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:48 pm to civiltiger07
quote:oohh look the goal posts just moved.
Did I say anything about a signature and date?
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:49 pm to civiltiger07
quote:no thank you. It's an opinion based on the LSP report. I'll just keep to the primary source of information.
Will you bother to look at that report?
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:52 pm to civiltiger07
quote:is this post correct?
The post you quoted is accurate.
quote:
As shocking as it sounds, it almost sounds as if the personal injury lawyer.......
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:13 pm to CarRamrod
I’m pretty sure the accident happened almost infront of dollar general parking lot which would be a tad south of black car and to the left side of Hwy
Looking back it was infront of DG parking lot.
Looking at your map, the second 20 hwy marker from bottom, look at the driveway to the left. Thats where accident happened. I know we not talking a great distance but that’s the spot where painting on hwy was.
Also that large truck blocking the majority of crash is at that old car wash, not in gas station parking lot.
Looking back it was infront of DG parking lot.
Looking at your map, the second 20 hwy marker from bottom, look at the driveway to the left. Thats where accident happened. I know we not talking a great distance but that’s the spot where painting on hwy was.
Also that large truck blocking the majority of crash is at that old car wash, not in gas station parking lot.
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 10/10/25 at 4:37 am to TigerGman
quote:
So Lacy was doing 88 in a no passing zone. But the DA says he wasn't "knowingly " culpable in the death of the Vietnam Vet
Does the DA’s report come to that conclusion? I don’t think it does unless I missed it.
The DA points out inconsistencys with the LSP investigation findings, and they we’re going to present the case to grand jury. Then let the jury decide.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 4:39 am to toosleaux
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 4:57 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 5:52 am to civiltiger07
quote:
So Lacy was doing 88 in a no passing zone. But the DA says he wasn't "knowingly " culpable in the death of the Vietnam Vet
Does the DA’s report come to that conclusion? I don’t think it does unless I missed it.
On yes it does--unbelievable:
quote:
Kyren Lacy was driving an average of 88 MPH while passing with a posted speed limit of 40 MPH. (Driver 2) was following too close which caused her to take evasive action to avoid hitting the back of (Redacted)'s truck. The evidence submitted in the crash report does not support that Kyren Lacy should have known that his actions were the cause of the crash that happened approximately 72 yards in front of him.
quote:
Lacy's culpability has been disputed by the Lafourche Parish District Attorney's office in its own investigation, which claims Lacy should not be charged with negligent homicide because he could not have known his actions caused the wreck, as he was more than 70 yards behind it when it happened.
wbrz
ETA:
quote:
State police said that while Lacy's Charger did not impact any of the vehicles, "all evidence collected supports the conclusion that Lacy's reckless operation of the green Charger in oncoming traffic triggered the chain of events involving the other drivers, ultimately resulting in the fatal crash."
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 5:59 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 5:54 am to TigerGman
Did you read the conclusion yourself?
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 5:59 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 6:20 am to civiltiger07
quote:
Did you read the conclusion yourself?
Several times over the last week or so. Why? What kind of blabbering idiot would conclude someone can do 88 mph in a no passing zone and not "know" you could cause an accident?
The Old man in the gold truck said he was about to head on me--so he had to brake and swerve to the side of the road. But yeah Gman, Lacy's reckless gross negligence had "nothing to do with it"
Shaking my damn head as to how ANYONE, other than Lacy's attorney and insurance company, could say that with a straight face...
Posted on 10/10/25 at 7:10 am to toosleaux
This like a chain-reaction-accident, negligent homicide is a stretch, he probably could have gotten it reduced to reckless driving or something.
My sister had someone slam on their brakes on the causeway, she slammed hers and stopped barely short of hitting the car.
The car behind my sister plowed into her pushing her into the next car, the third car's insurance refused to pay for damage to the front car stating it was my sister's fault.
My sister had someone slam on their brakes on the causeway, she slammed hers and stopped barely short of hitting the car.
The car behind my sister plowed into her pushing her into the next car, the third car's insurance refused to pay for damage to the front car stating it was my sister's fault.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 7:18 am to The Torch
Did she have video of the car in front slamming on their brakes?
Posted on 10/10/25 at 1:01 pm to The Torch
quote:
This like a chain-reaction-accident, negligent homicide is a stretch, he probably could have gotten it reduced to reckless driving or something.
How do you figure that? You think this is no different than getting caught in a speed trap or something? You're not getting a dead body case reduced to a frigging reckless opp.
If Lacy hadn't been going 88 miles per hour and scared the old man into suddenly veering out the way, he still be alive and probably starting on Sundays
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 10/10/25 at 1:05 pm to TigerGman
quote:
scared the old man into suddenly veering out the way
What if he would have veered the other direction ?
Posted on 10/10/25 at 1:18 pm to The Torch
quote:
What if he would have veered the other direction ?
Then he would have likely killed the Vietnam Veteran, not the woman.
How does that exculpate Lacy down to a fine and a driving safety class for reckless opp?
It's beyond dispute that none of it would have ever happened if Lacy wasn't doing 88 mph in a no passing zone.
What the hell is so hard to understand about that?
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 3:39 pm
Popular
Back to top


1





