Started By
Message

re: St Louis: Unarmed teen shot and killed by police, riot in progress.

Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:01 am to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128857 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:01 am to
You don't have to release every piece of information on Saturday or Sunday. But they could've released enough preliminary information to slow down the train. You have to defend every single decision the police make for some reason. This one isn't rational.
Posted by Paige
Vice President of the OT
Member since Oct 2010
85640 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:01 am to
What? They have ignored every bit of evidence that contradicts their narrative
Posted by Langston
Member since Nov 2010
7685 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:03 am to
I don't and I'm actually not a big fan of police but nice try. Its clear from my post I think it was handled poorly, but to place the blame on police for this is crazy.
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
29426 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:03 am to
Yeap, and they will continue to ignore everything that doesn't fit their narrative.
Posted by Langston
Member since Nov 2010
7685 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:04 am to
quote:

What? They have ignored every bit of evidence that contradicts their narrative


Exactly, and i would agree bass if it wasn't obvious this thing got legs locally in the videos from the crime scene. If I was the chief, I would be very careful about making a move also with so many screaming the hatred from the get go.
This post was edited on 8/19/14 at 10:05 am
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128857 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:04 am to
That's because the narrative was allowed to take hold. And then reinforced nationally unopposed for a fricking week. It's inexcusable.

That doesn't excuse any rioting or looting. It certainly does show that new paradigms or information handling need to be developed for law enforcement. By using a bunker mentality to protect from civil liability, they have been a shitty public stakeholder.
This post was edited on 8/19/14 at 10:05 am
Posted by Langston
Member since Nov 2010
7685 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:06 am to
quote:

That's because the narrative was allowed to take hold. And then reinforced nationally I opposed for a fricking week. It's inexcusable.


So it had nothing to do with the fact police said they were having trouble getitng statements from some of the witnesses?
Posted by Paige
Vice President of the OT
Member since Oct 2010
85640 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:07 am to
I think you're giving the protesters too much credit if you think they'd have listened to reason if it came sooner
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95683 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:08 am to
quote:

I think you're giving the protesters too much credit if you think they'd have listened to reason if it came sooner



+1
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128857 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:08 am to
quote:

If I was the chief, I would be very careful about making a move also with so many screaming the hatred from the get go.

Not making a move is a move. Not acting is a choice. Not releasing information is a choice. It's a passive choice but it's a choice. This isn't the Pony Express days. And they need to tell their legal advisors to suck a fat one when releasing information. Lawyers will paralyze you by analysis and prevent you from making appropriate decisions because they only speak the language of liability and that's a small piece of the picture.

What's more expensive? A lawsuit for the individual event or the cost to the city/county/businesses/community for the week?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128857 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:08 am to
quote:

I think you're giving the protesters too much credit if you think they'd have listened to reason if it came sooner

And to be blunt, I don't think you know shite about St. Louis. No offense.
Posted by Langston
Member since Nov 2010
7685 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:09 am to
I don't disagree it was a mess. My point is, I think it was handled differently because of what it was made into from the start. I think when in doubt, they should have slowed down and considered each step. And likewise, that's no excuse to go nuts and want the cop charged with murder without evidence to support it.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
20366 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:09 am to
quote:

I think you're giving the protesters too much credit if you think they'd have listened to reason if it came sooner


Excellent point, Paige.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128857 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:10 am to
quote:

So it had nothing to do with the fact police said they were having trouble getitng statements from some of the witnesses?


No. If it wasn't a police-involved shooting, would they have released zero details for 24 hours? Would they not have released any substantive details for a week? No.

It was a bunker mentality for liability reasons. And it was completely counterproductive.
Posted by Winkface
Member since Jul 2010
34377 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:10 am to
Any guesses on what information might come out today?
Posted by Langston
Member since Nov 2010
7685 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:11 am to
quote:

And to be blunt, I don't think you know shite about St. Louis. No offense.


Wait, this is about St. Louis now? I thought this was because of outsiders? Make up your mind man and quit flipping to defend your arguement at the moment.
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:12 am to
quote:

. And they need to tell their legal advisors to suck a fat one when releasing information.


Yea, sounds smart. I suggest you do this next time you need legal advice

quote:

What's more expensive? A lawsuit for the individual event or the cost to the city/county/businesses/community for the week?


If it was peaceful protest it would only take a handful of officers to provide security / close streets. You cant blame the mayhem on anybody but the looters and rioters
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128857 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Wait, this is about St. Louis now?


If you're not following the argument close enough to respond cogently don't bother responding. You think you get a gotcha point and have to jump in but you're really just not paying attention.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
20366 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Any guesses on what information might come out today?


Probably the parent's attorney saying that he was out buying a christmas present for his dear departed whoever?
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85138 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Any guesses on what information might come out today?



I have a feeling we may get details about the initial autopsy being that Baden came out with his version yesterday and questioned certain things that he didn't have access to.

I also think we will get confirmation from the DA that he is convening the Grand Jury tomorrow to begin determining whether to go forward or not.
Jump to page
Page First 680 681 682 683 684 ... 826
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 682 of 826Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram