- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St. George Responds to Economist Study
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:04 pm to doubleb
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:04 pm to doubleb
quote:
It would be nice if more posters would honestly declare whether or not they live in the SG area.
I live in the area, and remain unconvinced. There's no vision being put forward as to why having St George would be better. It's been half baked attacks about the library and responding to this economic study by yelling "BIAS". Is this admitting the study is actually correct and trying to discredit the source? Are they just too lazy to dig in and show why it's incorrect?
Not questions you want a potential voter asking about the people who will be tasked to put together the new government.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:12 pm to Duke
Duke I read your response and I have no issue at all. The SG side should be questioned and they should have to back up their numbers.
But it's obvious this One BR group is biased. They organized on 6/26 and already have their report ready.
IMHO, both groups are biased. Both should have to document their numbers, and neither has done that.
But you have to ask what services are SGeans getting for 44 million a year? Their numbers, not "ours".
Shouldn't the mayor be able to answer that question?
But it's obvious this One BR group is biased. They organized on 6/26 and already have their report ready.
IMHO, both groups are biased. Both should have to document their numbers, and neither has done that.
But you have to ask what services are SGeans getting for 44 million a year? Their numbers, not "ours".
Shouldn't the mayor be able to answer that question?
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:13 pm to Duke
I live in the area, and signed the petition, but i honestly don't get the point of this movement and its benefits, and have no idea if i'd vote for it or not.
I honestly am only interested in it b/c i am hoping it raises my home value, and that's about it. I've said it many times on here before, you are not going to get a bunch of kids to get taken out of Parkview and St. George and MBS and St. Jude and send them to some new fancy school that will still have shitty students in it. What can St. George do for TeddyPadillac that is so much better than what I currently have, and won't cost me more to get it?
I honestly am only interested in it b/c i am hoping it raises my home value, and that's about it. I've said it many times on here before, you are not going to get a bunch of kids to get taken out of Parkview and St. George and MBS and St. Jude and send them to some new fancy school that will still have shitty students in it. What can St. George do for TeddyPadillac that is so much better than what I currently have, and won't cost me more to get it?
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:19 pm to TeddyPadillac
Teddy, you said it, raise your property values.
Not immediately, but in time a well run ISD will draw folks to the area. People will want to raise families closer to their jobs.
I realize it won't happen over night, but ISDs work in Texas and they can work here.
Not immediately, but in time a well run ISD will draw folks to the area. People will want to raise families closer to their jobs.
I realize it won't happen over night, but ISDs work in Texas and they can work here.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:25 pm to doubleb
Read the PM section of the BR Business Report.
I don't see how anybody who has children could not support St. George and an eventual separate school system from EBR.
quote:
Capital Region third-graders behind state on LEAP scores, with some exceptions
quote:
Though more Louisiana students are scoring at least “mastery” on Louisiana Educational Assessment Program tests, Baton Rouge area third-graders, for the most part, scored lower than their statewide counterparts.
I don't see how anybody who has children could not support St. George and an eventual separate school system from EBR.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:37 pm to doubleb
quote:
Not immediately, but in time a well run ISD will draw folks to the area
Draw what folks?
people aren't going to stop attending Parkview and Catholic. If people wanted a good public high school for their kids, they'd simply go buy a bigger house for less money in Zachary or Dutchtown.
The school angle just doesn't fly with me, and i don't see that being the thing that raises my property value. My kids are in 2nd and Kindergarten. I doubt they will have a new public st. george high school to go to before they graduate.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:40 pm to doubleb
quote:
But it's obvious this One BR group is biased.
Yes.
The question is how the bias impacted the study?
quote:
Both should have to document their numbers, and neither has done that.
Right, so why should I trust StG anymore than I trust EBR?
quote:
But you have to ask what services are SGeans getting for 44 million a year? Their numbers, not "ours".
Shouldn't the mayor be able to answer that question?
Yes, she should. I don't need to be sold on the EBR government being wasteful and ineffective.
How StG will be better at investing that money in services and projects to improve the area is still very much lacking. Without that, why spend the money on a new city government structure?
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:40 pm to doubleb
Live in future SG area and support the movement. Can't put my name on the petition for business reasons, but when it gets enough signatures, will vote for it. My kids will almost be out of high school by the time it all gets set-up so the school issue won't really benefit me, but would like to make it happen for others. Keeping more of my tax dollars in our area is reason enough for me.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:43 pm to TeddyPadillac
Draw the folks like the ones who left over the past two decades to Ascension and Livingston.
They mainly left for one reason, good public schools.
By the time your kids reach HS age, I predict your kids would have the option of SG or private schools. It would be your choice of course.
But thousands left because they didn't have the money for private school or they preferred good public schools.
They mainly left for one reason, good public schools.
By the time your kids reach HS age, I predict your kids would have the option of SG or private schools. It would be your choice of course.
But thousands left because they didn't have the money for private school or they preferred good public schools.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:43 pm to Box Geauxrilla
quote:
You see, the mayor and elites in Baton Rouge
Hmmmm
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:45 pm to LSUengr
My kids have kids. I have the same vision you have. I signed. I have a business too.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:47 pm to Duke
Duke, keep calling em out.
That's what you should do. Make SG answer your questions. We need citizens like yourself on our side.
Again, I have no issue with you or your opinions.
That's what you should do. Make SG answer your questions. We need citizens like yourself on our side.
Again, I have no issue with you or your opinions.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:50 pm to TigerAlum1982
I am for it as I have seen what has happened and now causing problems for the Lafayette Consolidated Government will happen with the metro council. The Lafayette Consolidated Government which is similar to the metro council is trying to go back to a police jury and City of Lafayette Government to save the city of Lafayette from sinking into the financial burden of the unincorporated areas.
Issues eventually will happen to us if unincorporated areas do not incorporate.
- Cities of Broussard, Youngsville, Scott, Duson, Lafayette, and Carencro incorporated all the profitable areas.
- This makes the cost to provide services to incorporated areas very expensive as what is left is rural areas of subdivisions with not enough tax base around it.
- Some consolidated government members suggested having all the cities incorporate these areas around it to reduce the cost to the Lafayette consolidated Government as the operation cost for services is rising and putting a burden on the city of Lafayette.
The same thing is happening in EBRP.
The metro council is incorporating the businesses while leaving the neighborhoods around it not inside a city.
Eventually the cost will rise and services go down which is lacking as we speak, while the city of BR uses that money toward its bloated City Government.
Our taxes will eventually go up if we do or do not incorporate.
Incorporating this area will help keep our taxes in our area to help provide us with alot better city services such as cutting grass, garbage service, and maintain subdivision roads which are city roads.
The major roads in our area are mostly parish roads or state highways.
We will also control our growth by having our zoning board which will take the rubber stamp zoning in flood areas away from downtown and NBR.
Issues eventually will happen to us if unincorporated areas do not incorporate.
- Cities of Broussard, Youngsville, Scott, Duson, Lafayette, and Carencro incorporated all the profitable areas.
- This makes the cost to provide services to incorporated areas very expensive as what is left is rural areas of subdivisions with not enough tax base around it.
- Some consolidated government members suggested having all the cities incorporate these areas around it to reduce the cost to the Lafayette consolidated Government as the operation cost for services is rising and putting a burden on the city of Lafayette.
The same thing is happening in EBRP.
The metro council is incorporating the businesses while leaving the neighborhoods around it not inside a city.
Eventually the cost will rise and services go down which is lacking as we speak, while the city of BR uses that money toward its bloated City Government.
Our taxes will eventually go up if we do or do not incorporate.
Incorporating this area will help keep our taxes in our area to help provide us with alot better city services such as cutting grass, garbage service, and maintain subdivision roads which are city roads.
The major roads in our area are mostly parish roads or state highways.
We will also control our growth by having our zoning board which will take the rubber stamp zoning in flood areas away from downtown and NBR.
This post was edited on 7/10/18 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:52 pm to johnnyrocket
You make a good point.
Very good point.
Good job rocket man
Very good point.
Good job rocket man
Posted on 7/10/18 at 5:02 pm to TeddyPadillac
Property values are soaring in EBR. My house just appraised for 180K more than I bought it for 3 years ago.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 5:03 pm to johnnyrocket
quote:
We will also control our growth by having our zoning board which will take the rubber stamp zoning in flood areas away from downtown and NBR.
You lost me here. If you want to make development harder than it already is in this Parish, then I may have to rethink my vote.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 5:26 pm to LSUengr
It will give the people who live in this area who will be appointed or elected by people in this area a say in zoining.
Your neighbors and my neighbors will be the ones making this decision not other areas of this parish.
If they feel the area has sufficient infrastructure or not to allow development it will be up to the appointed people that live here.
If you know anything about developing land EBRP is a rubber stamp parish compared to other parishes. Which eventually will come back to bite taxpayers in the tail.
Your neighbors and my neighbors will be the ones making this decision not other areas of this parish.
If they feel the area has sufficient infrastructure or not to allow development it will be up to the appointed people that live here.
If you know anything about developing land EBRP is a rubber stamp parish compared to other parishes. Which eventually will come back to bite taxpayers in the tail.
This post was edited on 7/10/18 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 7/10/18 at 5:57 pm to Box Geauxrilla
quote:
a tweet from Chauna Banks this morning indicated her preference.
“Choosing a progressive Democrat to fill the vacant District 8 council seat would be a tremendous blow to the St. George effort!”
the councilwoman said on her Twitter account. In truth, whoever fills the vacancy will have little say in the St. George incorporation effort, especially with the petition process well underway.
Wow, this hag is dumber than anyone could ever imagine. They actually think they finna get over on St.George if they get a democrat in there. LOLOL
Do any of these morons have degrees, and if so, where? Is it a Degree factory for African Americans, like Harris Stowe is in St.Louis(it's where dumb people go to get teaching degrees)
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:07 pm to johnnyrocket
Since it is my livelihood, I know plenty about it. If by rubber stamp, you mean a project that meets all the requirements set forth by the entities that control development gets approved at a planning meeting or council meeting, then you have a very loose interpretation of rubber stamp. St. Tammany may be the only Parish near us that it is harder to develop in.
Again, if this is a StG talking point, then I will have to reconsider my stance.
Again, if this is a StG talking point, then I will have to reconsider my stance.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:07 pm to LSUvegasbombed
quote:
ey should have the 25% min of sigs by now and they dont.
Somebody asked me today if they had the signatures needed. Where are you getting the info that they don't?
Popular
Back to top


2



