Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Spanish flu if it was today?

Posted on 5/22/20 at 2:31 pm
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24485 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 2:31 pm
Have there been any reports on the impact of Spanish flu if it hit today? Certainly Covid-19 in 1919 likely kills many more, so therefore is it not fair that Spanish Flu today would likely be less deadly due to modern medicine, disenfectants, etc.?

I guess my point is we seem to have an outbreak every 15 years or so? They all seem
Similar enough in that if we wore masks in public, cancelled major events over 100 people, and otherwise made moves to slow them down they would be nothing to prevent normal daily life to continue? How many past pandemics can we without a doubt say we would need to shut down society? Arguably none?
Posted by DownTheBayouBengal
Terrebonne Parish
Member since Apr 2013
178 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 2:35 pm to
Well, first off we wouldn't call it 'Spanish' flu today because that's apparently racist in case you didn't know
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

Certainly Covid-19 in 1919 likely kills many more


Would it?
Posted by Sidbarret
Charleston, SC
Member since Apr 2008
625 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Spain was one of only a few major European countries to remain neutral during World War I. Unlike in the Allied and Central Powers nations, where wartime censors suppressed news of the flu to avoid affecting morale, the Spanish media was free to report on it in gory detail. News of the sickness first made headlines in Madrid in late-May 1918, and coverage only increased after the Spanish King Alfonso XIII came down with a nasty case a week later. Since nations undergoing a media blackout could only read in depth accounts from Spanish news sources, they naturally assumed that the country was the pandemic’s ground zero. The Spanish, meanwhile, believed the virus had spread to them from France, so they took to calling it the “French Flu.”

While it’s unlikely that the “Spanish Flu” originated in Spain, scientists are still unsure of its source. France, China and Britain have all been suggested as the potential birthplace of the virus, as has the United States, where the first known case was reported at a military base in Kansas on March 11, 1918. Researchers have also conducted extensive studies on the remains of victims of the pandemic, but they have yet to discover why the strain that ravaged the world in 1918 was so lethal.




History
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25964 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

The Spanish, meanwhile, believed the virus had spread to them from France, so they took to calling it the “French Flu.”


If only...that would have been a much more easily defeated strain.
Posted by Shaun176
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
3181 posts
Posted on 5/22/20 at 3:05 pm to
Covid would kill less in 1919 because the life expectancy was 56 and 90% of covid deaths are in people over 56.

The typical flu even today with a vaccine and tamiflu kills more kids and the same number of young healthy adults as covid.

If we had a deadly novel flu like the Spanish flu, day cares and elementary schools would be like nursing homes are with covid.

The only advantage we would have is that we could develop a vaccine faster.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram