- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Solve this math problem
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:17 am to Scruffy
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:17 am to Scruffy
quote:Then the problem was probably written different in the text written form where operations can be represented in their exact form (e.g., an exponent is shown as a superscript instead of a ^).
It probably does because it isn't 3 divided by 1 and then divided by 3.
It is 3 divided by 1/3.
No way all of you guys were wrong.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:17 am to kingbob
quote:Correct, which is why calculators will tell you 9. They simply solve the equation with zero assumptions
Based purely as written:
3 divided by 1 = 3. 3/3=1. 9-1=8. 8+1=9. The answer is 9.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:18 am to kingbob
quote:
There are multiple ways to solve this problem depending on order of operations

The frick there is. The whole point of order of operations is that there is one way to correctly solve math.
quote:
Based purely as written:
3 divided by 1 = 3. 3/3=1. 9-1=8. 8+1=9. The answer is 9.
"Purely as written" is the only way to correctly solve math problems. Anything else is arbitrary nonsense.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:19 am to Scruffy
quote:
Suck it everybody!


Then they go and change the equation by adding a ()
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:19 am to buckeye_vol
quote:That is what I have been saying!
Then the problem was probably written different in the text written form where operations can be represented in their exact form (e.g., an exponent is shown as a superscript instead of a ^).

The way it appeared in the OP was a format problem.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:19 am to lsupride87
See I got it even more fricked up. I did
9 – 3/1/3 + 1
= 9 – 3/3 + 1
= 9 – 1 + 1
= 9 - 2
= 7
You know because MDAS addition before subtraction
9 – 3/1/3 + 1
= 9 – 3/3 + 1
= 9 – 1 + 1
= 9 - 2
= 7
You know because MDAS addition before subtraction
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:19 am to LNCHBOX
quote:It wasn't. It was ambiguous.
It's properly written for anyone that knows how to properly solve a math problem.
The 1/3 was intended to be a fraction, in which case if you're typing it out you have to use either ? or (1/3). Otherwise, if you just type out 3/1/3, it should be evaluated left to right.
Edit: I guess that didn't work, so for those confused that ? should look like an actual 1/3 fraction.
This post was edited on 9/5/17 at 11:24 am
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:20 am to lsupride87
Hey, all Scruffy saw was 3 divided by 1/3.
You were wrong.
You were wrong.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:21 am to Korkstand
quote:Ding ding ding
It wasn't. It was ambiguous.
The 1/3 was intended to be a fraction, in which case if you're typing it out you have to use either ? or (1/3). Otherwise, if you just type out 3/1/3, it should be evaluated left to right.
We have a winner.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:21 am to Korkstand
quote:
It wasn't. It was ambiguous.
No it isn't.
quote:
The 1/3 was intended to be a fraction
Link?
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:22 am to Scruffy
quote:I am going to find a dildo shaped calculator, type the problem in, then throw it at your face as it shows 9
Hey, all Scruffy saw was 3 divided by 1/3.
You were wrong.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:22 am to Placebeaux
This is stupid. Why would anyone write it like that. And use multiple division symbols.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:22 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Doesnt matter what it was intended to be. As written it is 9
The 1/3 was intended to be a fraction

Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:22 am to 50_Tiger
I get 9. That's following PEMDAS without inserting parenthesis that aren't there or assuming the 1/3 is a given.
If the problem itself was shitty and it happened to be written, you could call it a shitty written problem. However, if the problem with the problem is the shitty manner in which it was written you should use the adverbial form of the modifier shitty, shittily.
It's all in how you interpret a shittily written problem.
quote:
It's all in how you interpret a shitty written problem.
If the problem itself was shitty and it happened to be written, you could call it a shitty written problem. However, if the problem with the problem is the shitty manner in which it was written you should use the adverbial form of the modifier shitty, shittily.
It's all in how you interpret a shittily written problem.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:22 am to Scruffy
quote:Well the the OP wrote the wrong problem then. The problem he asked to be solved has an answer of 9.
That is what I have been saying!
The way it appeared in the OP was a format problem.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:23 am to lsupride87
quote:
I am going to find a dildo shaped calculator, type the problem in, then throw it at your face as it shows 9

Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:24 am to buckeye_vol
quote:Y'all read the problem wrong. Y'all assumed it wasn't 1/3.
Well the the OP wrote the wrong problem then. The problem he asked to be solved has an answer of 9.

Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:25 am to LNCHBOX
quote:It was, because OP was trying to use spacing to indicate 1/3 was a fraction.
No it isn't.
quote:The source of the problem
Link?
Posted on 9/5/17 at 11:26 am to lsupride87
quote:OP changed the equation because it couldn't be typed out as intended.
Right off the bat they change the equation by adding parenthesis
Popular
Back to top
