- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Smith Shooter's Lawyer "My Client Was Not The Aggressor"
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:43 am to lsupride87
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:43 am to lsupride87
quote:
He didnt say he was drunk. He said he drank and drove. Which at this point we do know is fact
It's as if words have no meaning these days.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:43 am to lsupride87
quote:
management at Sake Cafe Uptown say they're not buying it -- insisting Smith only had 1 glass of wine during the roughly 75 minutes he was at the restaurant.
Yep, he drank, then drove.
The implication of what you are saying is that he was drunk and drove. If that wasn't what you were implying, you wouldn't keep bringing it up. 1 glass of wine over a 75 minute period for a 280 pound man is significantly lower than the legal limit.
Until toxicology comes out to verify or disprove that, we only have restaurant management to go off of. They are no less valuable than any witness testimony at this point.
quote:
re: Smith Shooter's Lawyer "My Client Was Not The Aggressor" - lsupride87 on 4/13/16 at 7:51 amquote:This board normally calls people who drive drunk "THUG POS." And this board also calls people who hit and run "THUG POS." It is interesting to see the change...
He wasn't thugging.
This post was edited on 4/14/16 at 8:49 am
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:44 am to oleyeller
quote:
the truth. -had smith not drank and drived he would still be alive -had smith not hit and run he would still be alive -had smith not jumped out the vehicle and confront hayes he would still be alive -had smith not threatned he had a gun (according to witness) he would still be alive
You are missing a key point, none of those problems should lead to the death of someone. Yes Smith could have handled things better, but he didn't deserve to lose his life. What is so hard for y'all to understand? The guy was shot 8 times and his wife was shot. Nothing that happened that night should have resulted in someone getting murdered.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:46 am to GeauxTime9
quote:We have no idea if this is true yet. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
but he didn't deserve to lose his life. What is so hard for y'all to understand?
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:47 am to csorre1
quote:
1 glass of wine over a 75 minute period for a 280 pound man is significantly lower than the legal limit.
You're assuming he didn't have anything to drink prior to dinner. Wasn't the accident pretty late. and he was only at Sake for a little over an hour. There's no way of knowing until tox comes back.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:47 am to GeauxTime9
quote:
Nothing that happened that night should have resulted in someone getting murdered.
This is, again, an unknown considering what little information is available. His attorney, just yesterday evening, gave a statement that could very well alter this entire case, if true. You guys are ridiculous in jumping to conclusions and making gigantic leaps with assumptions.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:48 am to GeauxTime9
quote:
The guy was shot 8 times
This probably happened in 3-4 seconds. A lot of people empty the clip when its first time they shoot someone.
I doubt he was standing there shooting Will.
POW! Want another
POW! Another?
Smith: please stop
You didn't stop when you ran into me
POW POW POW POW...
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:48 am to Oates Mustache
quote:Yep. He is making definitive statements, and then harping on us?
This is, again, an unknown considering what little information is available. His attorney, just yesterday evening, gave a statement that could very well alter this entire case, if true. You guys are ridiculous in jumping to conclusions and making gigantic leaps with assumptions.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:50 am to Scooba
quote:
You're assuming he didn't have anything to drink prior to dinner.
No, I am saying that the only verifiable drink that he had was the 1 glass. I also stated that we won't know until toxicology comes out.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:51 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
A lot of people empty the clip
Stop
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:51 am to lsupride87
It's why this whole thread is a shite show. Too many people making factual statements using their opinions. How hard is it to use words like "if", or "in my opinion"? Jesus Christ, we've gone full retard potato.
This post was edited on 4/14/16 at 8:52 am
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:57 am to GeauxTime9
quote:
Nothing that happened that night should have resulted in someone getting murdered.
how do you know? Yeah I guess if you only want to consider the hit and run obviously nobody should be shot for a minor hit and run..
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:57 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
You didn't stop when you ran into me
POW POW POW POW...
lol, I almost spit up my coffee when I read that
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:59 am to Rebel
quote:
the "accident" may have very well been an accident. Won't even bring up the question about being intoxicated.
If it was a "hit and run", then they should be able to lift paint or see where Hayes' vehicle was impacted by Will Smith's vehicle.
So only after the FACTS come out will we know what happened.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 9:00 am to LSU2NO
Wait, waiiiiiit, are you denying the hit and run?
There are videos, and Smiths own attorney has admitted to it
There are videos, and Smiths own attorney has admitted to it
Posted on 4/14/16 at 9:03 am to Sneaky__Sally
really wasn't tryin to be funny
Posted on 4/14/16 at 9:08 am to Oates Mustache
quote:
This is, again, an unknown considering what little information is available
What is unknown about the fact that a fender bender shouldn't cost someone their life?
Posted on 4/14/16 at 9:09 am to LSU2NO
quote:
If it was a "hit and run", then they should be able to lift paint or see where Hayes' vehicle was impacted by Will Smith's vehicle.
So only after the FACTS come out will we know what happened.
WUT.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 9:17 am to lsupride87
quote:
Wait, waiiiiiit, are you denying the hit and run?
There are videos, and Smiths own attorney has admitted to it
Yes, there is a surveillance video, but it is not conclusive proof of contact between the vehicles. And Will Smith's lawyer has not admitted that they vehicles made contact.
Per the statements made in the Baton Rouge Advocate on 4/14/2016.
I do not assume anything. I would have to see proof. Even if Hayes was the instigator. It looks like it, but you would have to run the facts by me first.
This post was edited on 4/14/16 at 9:20 am
Popular
Back to top



0




