Started By
Message

re: Sitting in an open thermos, which reaches room temperature (20°C) faster?

Posted on 6/1/21 at 8:33 pm to
Posted by calcotron
Member since Nov 2007
10073 posts
Posted on 6/1/21 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

You don’t think water can condense on the surface?


I know that it can, that goes with the assumption that heat transfer only occurs on the top surface of the water. I was only talking about the thermos, hence the commentary about thermos effectiveness.
Posted by luvdoc
"Please Ignore Our Yelp Reviews"
Member since May 2005
1096 posts
Posted on 6/1/21 at 8:42 pm to
Assuming the fluid is filled to the top of the thermos, and the lid is on, so no air, and no evaporation / condensation, and both thermoses are shaped the same.

I believe both will require the same amount of energy transfer to reach the desired temperature.

Also assume no or at least the same air motion around both thermoses to allow equal opportunity for heat transfer, and it comes down to the natural convection within the thermos maximizing the temperature gradient between the air – thermos – water.

So which will have the greater convection? I would guess the hot 1, due to slightly less dense?

The hot one would have the fluid around the walls falling and an internal / Central updraft, while the cold would see the fluid Rising at the walls and falling centrally. Assuming identical geometry, I don't think that would create an intrinsic difference, but it's interesting to visualize
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30014 posts
Posted on 6/1/21 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

and the lid is on


Already failed to match the hypothetical.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12626 posts
Posted on 6/1/21 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

I know that it can, that goes with the assumption that heat transfer only occurs on the top surface of the water. I was only talking about the thermos, hence the commentary about thermos effectiveness.

Gotcha. Fair enough.

The point about humidity is still valid - you will see heat added to the “cold” system (meaning water inside the thermos) via condensation if the humidity is sufficiently high. And you will see heat removed from the “hot” system via evaporation if the humidity is sufficiently low.

However, I think evaporation would be more impactful than condensation over the long run (at a given rate of evaporation/condensation) because evaporation removes both heat and mass from the system, while condensation adds heat but also adds mass. So you would see diminishing returns from the effects of condensation.

I’m also not convinced that evaporation/condensation rates are the primary factors determining which system heats/cools faster in the first place. Maybe at the humidity extremes, but I would think under most conditions the convection from the hot system would have a larger impact.
This post was edited on 6/1/21 at 9:35 pm
Posted by Duke
Dillon, CO
Member since Jan 2008
36439 posts
Posted on 6/1/21 at 9:30 pm to
Convection would dominate I think.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram