Started By
Message

re: Should YOU even be allowed to have children? (eugenics discussion)

Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:11 am to
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:11 am to
quote:

It's genetic diversity that creates advances and leaps forward in the human race. Genetic similarity produces strengths, but weaknesses as well.

Think of it this way... eugenics would produce a slow, steady climb upward in ability, species-wide for the human race. But opening the gene pool with interbreeding of different, diverse types of genes... will lead to more average people... and also... more geniuses and prodigies, with the capability of changing the game for the human race.

Eugenics seems great on the surface, but real change, in anything, comes from difference, not similarity.


You make a really good point with regard to genetic diversity, which is paramount when considering optimal genetics. Such diversity would still be capable in the method I proposed. Unless you think more unintelligent people within the gene pool will result in more geniuses?
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
154109 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:11 am to
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
133316 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:14 am to
You realize that the avg. iq of some demographics is below 110, right?
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
98750 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:15 am to
I think a better way would be to cut all the assistance programs, if you have more children than you can support then they die off
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
26064 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:16 am to
How about free contraceptives and morning after pills? I would like to see welfare eliminated for kids.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:17 am to
quote:

It's genetic diversity that creates advances and leaps forward in the human race. Genetic similarity produces strengths, but weaknesses as well.

Think of it this way... eugenics would produce a slow, steady climb upward in ability, species-wide for the human race. But opening the gene pool with interbreeding of different, diverse types of genes... will lead to more average people... and also... more geniuses and prodigies, with the capability of changing the game for the human race.

Eugenics seems great on the surface, but real change, in anything, comes from difference, not similarity.



There are people from all different genetic backgrounds that could pass this criteria in the OP. Its not like he's limiting it to one race or creed or heritage, etc.

I think its a fricking stupid idea, but your point is not why.
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:18 am to
quote:

You realize that the avg. iq of some demographics is below 110, right?

That's why they would be required to offer strong physical traits.

And even if they completely suck and offer nothing to the human race, they can still have one child.

So you're either (A) smart (B) physically gifted (C) both or (D) none of the above (in which case you get one child).
Posted by AllemanWC
Bayou Corne
Member since Jan 2015
1001 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:18 am to
Donald Trump, is that you?
Trying to get some policy feedback for the campaign? This place is filled with great ideas. Good Luck next November
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:19 am to
quote:

I think a better way would be to cut all the assistance programs, if you have more children than you can support then they die off



Cut off "additional assistance" after the first kid and apply it only to the future. People who get it now, congrats you win, but people in the future best stop having children.

And birth control is insanely cheap. Just give it and plan B (which is concentrated birth control) to anyone that wants it. Set up store fronts all over the place and give it away anonymously to women.

Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:20 am to
quote:

There are people from all different genetic backgrounds that could pass this criteria in the OP. Its not like he's limiting it to one race or creed or heritage, etc.

I think its a fricking stupid idea, but your point is not why.


You may not like the idea, but based on your reasoning skills, I believe you would pass the tests and be allowed to reproduce at your discretion.
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:21 am to
quote:

You're such a racist.

Care to explain how?
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:23 am to
quote:

You may not like the idea, but based on your reasoning skills, I believe you would pass the tests and be allowed to reproduce at your discretion.




Yes I would. I'm a strong, white male with good test scores, decent athletic ability, and good education.

However a lot of that is due to my circumstance in childhood.

Its one thing to NOT REWARD poor, dumb people for having kids. Its another to NOT ALLOW it. Its downright un-American to say people aren't allowed to have kids, but I also believe its downright stupid to REWARD them with more money and benefits if they are already suckling at the government teet.

Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:23 am to
quote:

So you could be an unfit moron and have as many kids if you want as long as you were not prone to violent crime? And even if you were, as long as your partner was not and also had an average IQ, you are good to go?

I'm not for this, but if you're going to propose something so radical, at least set it up so that nearly every human on earth isn't include

I'm sorry but based on your reading ability I don't think you would be allowed to reproduce. Not on your own merit anyway.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
68983 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:27 am to
As a member of the unlimited child club, what is society going to offer me to have my children? The breeders will need to work overtime to ensure human survival, so you'd have to offer incentives so they wouldn't choose 0 or 1 kid.
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Yes I would. I'm a strong, white male with good test scores, decent athletic ability, and good education.

However a lot of that is due to my circumstance in childhood.



Your inherent aptitude is a result of your circumstance in childhood? Your genetic markers, which determine your bone density, body frame, muscle mass limits and inherent athletic abilities, are also a result of your circumstance in childhood?
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22859 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Care to explain how?


Everybody can see that this is a thinly veiled attempt to prevent minorities from having more kids. Just because someone's great great grandparents never had the opportunity to learn to read and write doesn't mean that they shouldn't be allowed to have children.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:30 am to
quote:

so they wouldn't choose 0 or 1 kid.



Which is also part of our issue today.

Not only do uneducated, poor people reproduce at an alarming rate, but the well-educated, well-off part of society no longer tries to have large families.

Its more of a family planning society with women having careers just like men and people becoming more prone to saving their money as opposed to having 5 or 6 kids (or even 4).

Again, Idiocracy is happening and its terrifying.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
68983 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:30 am to
Yes, I realize your convoluted description meant one, the other, or both as the "3" groups. It's actually an either/or scenario, since you wouldn't need to take the second test if you passed the first.

Your way of determining who has the IQ standard met tells me you probably don't.
Posted by Chillini
Member since Sep 2012
3153 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:30 am to
Should YOU even be allowed to post? No.
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 12/28/15 at 11:30 am to
quote:

As a member of the unlimited child club, what is society going to offer me to have my children? The breeders will need to work overtime to ensure human survival, so you'd have to offer incentives so they wouldn't choose 0 or 1 kid.


You'll get to live in a virtually crime-free society, surrounded by smart and/or beautiful people. You will also get a free Carnival cruise for each child.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram