Started By
Message

re: Secretary at Ouachita Junior High text racial slur to wrong person concerning MLK Day.

Posted on 1/17/23 at 12:52 pm to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Also, 2005 called and wants its “Democrats are the real racists” line back.




They're the real racists now

Don't think the right thinks black people are too stupid to get IDs and figure out how to vote.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Lots of victim complex people in this thread.


Hey, we get it.

You have a very low opinion of black people and you think it's awesome that they run around promoting all sorts of variations of that trashy word...

You wanna be a racist idiot, go ahead.

Most of us just want to treat our brothers with respect, not look down on them as if they were so trashy that this word is "ok" for them to use....
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65876 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

What lawsuit are we hypothesizing about - wrongful termination?


Assuming she's terminated, yes.

She could easily show this language is allowed on school property regularly, with no reprisals, so her text message on a day off outside of school property should not have resulted in her firing.
This post was edited on 1/17/23 at 12:59 pm
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
5488 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

They're the real racists now

The soft bigotry of low expectations, I get it.
It doesn’t excuse anything.

quote:

Don't think the right thinks black people are too stupid to get IDs and figure out how to vote.

The right (correctly) doesn’t care if stupid people don’t get to vote because they can’t get an ID. We don’t want stupid people voting.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

She could easily show this language is allowed on school property regularly, with no reprisals, so her text message on a day off outside of school property should not have resulted in her firing.


And then she'd end up with a 5-figure bill in sanctions

In fact, if they didn't terminate her, the other employee likely could sue them for creating a hostile work environment in violation of the CRA

quote:

he single use of a racial epithet can give rise to a viable claim of a hostile work environment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, according to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Title VII prohibits discrimination and harassment on the basis of race.

An employee sued his employer, alleging, among other things, that his supervisor called him the N-word in the presence of other workers, thereby creating a hostile work environment. The lower court dismissed the claim, concluding that a single comment was insufficient to support a claim under Title VII.

On appeal, the 5th Circuit reversed the decision, deciding that the employee had stated a viable claim. While acknowledging it had previously found that a single instance involving the use of a racial slur does not, in and of itself, support a hostile work environment claim, the appeals court clarified that the question depends on the totality of the circumstances.

The court went on to explain that the N-word is an especially offensive term and suggested that there is perhaps no single act that could create a hostile work environment quicker than a supervisor's use of a racial epithet in front of subordinates.

By holding that a single incident can give rise to an actionable hostile work environment claim under Title VII, the 5th Circuit joined a growing consensus among federal appellate circuits. The message is clear: One racial slur is one too many.

Woods v. Cantrell, 5th Cir., No. 21-30150 (March 24, 2022).
This post was edited on 1/17/23 at 1:01 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Assuming she's terminated, yes. She could easily show this language is allowed on school property regularly, with no reprisals, so her text message on a day off outside of school property should not have resulted in her firing.


I, umm, highly highly doubt she’d win.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65876 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

And then she'd end up with a 5-figure bill in sanctions


Nope. She'd easily win.

quote:

In fact, if they didn't terminate her, the other employee likely could sue them for creating a hostile work environment in violation of the CRA


Again, nope. If he's truly a coach, he absolutely is on video on a practice field walking right by people using that term without batting an eye.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

I, umm, highly highly doubt she’d win.

Correct, the legal standard is not, "since students use the N-word as a hailname, in a non-derogatory sense, then co-workers can use the N-word as a racist, derogatory term."
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Again, nope. If he's truly a coach, he absolutely is on video on a practice field walking right by people using that term without batting an eye.



I await your citation for this legal argument.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Lots of victim complex people in this thread.


Hey, we get it.

You have a very low opinion of black people and you think it's awesome that they run around promoting all sorts of variations of that trashy word...



tWhite guilt is strong. Never ceases to amaze.

Regular person: There's an obvious double standard

SJWs: It only bothers you because you're insecure and racist.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Regular person: There's an obvious double standard

SJWs: It only bothers you because you're insecure and racist.

And yet, I never said this
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
60710 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Again, nope. If he's truly a coach, he absolutely is on video on a practice field walking right by people using that term without batting an eye.

lol this guy isn't coach prime with a documentary crew following him everywhere
Posted by BR92
Member since Apr 2021
1061 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

ol this guy isn't coach prime with a documentary crew following him everywhere



No, but we live in a society where just about everything is recorded now.
Posted by GhostofLesticleMiles
High Plains Drifter
Member since Sep 2019
1156 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

And yet, I never said this


You never say anything but constantly have something to say.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

You never say anything but constantly have something to say.

No my argument was made out explicitly and multiple times, even with visual aids for the intellectually deficient
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23831 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:26 pm to
Suck to be her!
I've texted wrong person a couple of times, not a good thing.
The only problem here is that she made a mistake and it was displayed publicly.
I'm sure I'll "trigger" some, but there are different levels of prejudice. Because she said something stupid doesn't mean she acted that way professionally.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

No my argument was made out explicitly and multiple times


Yet you were wrong each time, Rainman.....
Posted by Seen
Member since Aug 2022
1127 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Also, 2005 called and wants its “Democrats are the real racists” line back.



To be fair, this has been the case for decades and is now even worse among white democrats.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:30 pm to
quote:


Most of us just want to treat our brothers with respect, not look down on them as if they were so trashy that this word is "ok" for them to use


Progs believe black folks are wards of their secular religion and subscribe to nannyism to help protect and keep them in line.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Nope. She'd easily win.
No she wouldn’t. You have no clue what you are talking about. This is one of the dumbest takes in a thread full of really dumb takes.
This post was edited on 1/17/23 at 1:34 pm
Jump to page
Page First 19 20 21 22 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 21 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram