Started By
Message

re: Scientists find no evidence of depression being caused by "chemical imbalances" in brain

Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:14 pm to
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7285 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:14 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/27/22 at 11:06 pm
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6530 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

There's no mistake.



I know you meant what you said, thats what makes it even sadder.

quote:

Yes I acknowledge that this isn't a good point, however even if you wanted to use this point it would support me. That's what I'm saying


how does a point you made that contradicts itself support you?
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10868 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:20 pm to
SSRIs are like baby ecstasy. X floods your brain with serotonin and that makes you feel good. SSRIs keep more serotonin in your brain. We don't know what exactly causes depression but perhaps serotonin plays a role. If increasing serotonin helps people deal with depression and anxiety and for most people it's safe and side effects are minimal then let then take SSRIs.
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7285 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:21 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/27/22 at 11:06 pm
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7285 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:23 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/27/22 at 11:06 pm
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
28588 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

I am just smarter than you


We have already established you are a liar:

quote:

Well now I'm the Chief of Medicine at St Vincent's. I'm board certified in 3 states. I did my residency in Bayonne NJ where I interned with Dr. Berks Findley attending. Brilliant man. I have 15 years clinical experience


I bet AMS is educated enough to find the smoking gun in that trove of mendacity.

Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6530 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:34 pm to
gaggle is just a mess of incoherence and self contradiction.
it doesnt take much education for this to be obvious.
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7285 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:36 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/27/22 at 11:05 pm
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6530 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

So just look at the ideas


we have, theyre moronic.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
37828 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

Now I'm a chiro or CRNA because I guess I have demonstrated my experience.


Lol, that's not why you moron.

quote:

See if I'm right or not. Try to honestly debate without calling me an idiot or wondering who I am.


I did. Your points were insanely stupid and you didn't understand the basics of pathology.
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7285 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:40 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/27/22 at 11:05 pm
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
58623 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

Thereby making SSRIs completely useless when it comes to combatting depression.


I have never been on any medication for depression however, I am pretty sure this is a bunch of bullshite.
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6530 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

You can't explain why there are zero direct tests proving contagion airborne or saliva human to human.

There should be many for every single pandemic. There are none successful for any, ever.




they have done so plenty of times in animal experiments considering it is unethical as frick to do with humans and entirely unnecessary.
quote:

And your only real reason you won't face it is because "all these smart people can't be wrong" as if that's never happened and it is too scary a proposition, too much to lose.


no its because theres a wealth of data and what you are saying is moronic on its face.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
79732 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

they have done so plenty of times in animal experiments considering it is unethical as frick to do with humans and entirely unnecessary.


We actually just did though.
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7285 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:49 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/27/22 at 11:05 pm
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6530 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

We actually just did though.



interesting. can you link?
im not aware of one done in the fashion I suspect gaggle is referring to, but suppose it could be done in another way.

I mean I believe human to human contagion exists (well duh its obvious from the data that exists) but also because im not a total fricktwit like gaggle, just havent seen the thing youre talking about
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
14097 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:51 pm to
dude you believe in a flat earth and are a gravity denier.

the fact that you say you are chief of medicine at a hospital is scary, very scary.

Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6530 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

They don't use animal models today for direct cough, phlegm, saliva which would make perfect sense. And we have 100 years of much more gruesome experiments all common sense says ethics wouldn't have stopped anything.


they have tho over 50 years ago even. rodent models from coughing/sneezing. you are just clueless
This post was edited on 7/27/22 at 6:55 pm
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6530 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

the fact that you say you are chief of medicine at a hospital is scary, very scary.



its also very obviously a lie
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7285 posts
Posted on 7/27/22 at 6:53 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/27/22 at 11:05 pm
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram