- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: School in gretna bans weaves
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:27 pm to Tiger Prawn
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:27 pm to Tiger Prawn
quote:
Either they were having problems with some girls not paying attention in class because they were busy playing with their extensions.
Then unless they are willing to make kids with natural ponytails that play with their hair cut it short, the rule only targets certain students.
quote:then, as it was pointed out earlier, the school is lazily making a blanket rule that is seen as attacking a certain demographic.
Or some girls started pushing the envelope on what the school was willing to allow, and it was easier to ban it completely than to try to draw a line on what was going to be allowed and what wasn't.
It's a shitty policy and they deserve the criticism.
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:28 pm to Deactived
quote:
Are those hair styles in the pic ok for public school?
They are not ok for a charter school that receives public funds
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:30 pm to dixiechick
Religious schools that receive federal funding can still do many things that are against federal law, including teaching religion, requiring attendance at mass, dress codes, hair style rules, and hiring/employment practices that would ordinarily violate federal law (anti-gay, religious test, etc).
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:33 pm to Displaced
quote:Yes. If a private company (or school for this matter) has a set of standards; a certain group of people cant get upset just because it effects them and not someone else. It’s like guys protesting that they should be allowed to have facial hair at a job that says you cant. “It’s unfair to the men!!”
Do you disagree?
It’s chicken shite imo.
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:33 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Religious schools that receive federal funding can still do many things that are against federal law, including teaching religion, requiring attendance at mass, dress codes, hair style rules, and hiring/employment practices that would ordinarily violate federal law (anti-gay, religious test, etc).
Great points.....
Didn't even think about the religious implementations...
This post was edited on 8/21/18 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:34 pm to Displaced
quote:
the school is lazily making a blanket rule that is seen as attacking a certain demographic.
Then shite. All of their hair policies are discriminatory against a certain demographic.
quote:
? Boys’ hairstyles may not cover their ears, eyebrows, or collar of their uniform shirts.
? Boys’ haircuts must be conventional: wedges, shaved heads, uneven cuts, shaved sides with longer
tops, bowl cuts, tails, or lines showing in the hair will not be permitted.
Bans on boys having hair covering their ears discriminates against white boys who wear that Justin Beiber haircut. Banning boys hair from being over the collars discriminates against white boys from the country that want to rock an awesome mullet. Not allowing bowl cuts is racist against asians.
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:34 pm to Ryan3232
I'm not saying they shouldn't be allowed to make the rule, I'm saying it's a shitty, lazy rule that deserves criticism.
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:36 pm to Displaced
quote:That’s fair.
I'm not saying they shouldn't be allowed to make the rule, I'm saying it's a shitty, lazy rule that deserves criticism.
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:39 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/1/20 at 10:36 am
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:41 pm to dixiechick
quote:
My point is.... you can’t be both a “private” school and accept government funding.
no that wasnt your point...you said....
quote:
A school that receives federal funding has to abide by federal anti discrimination laws. My point being... if Christ the King receives federal funding they might be in a pickle here due to federal anti discrimination laws and a possible lawsuit....
and you're wrong
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:41 pm to Hangover Haven
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/1/20 at 10:35 am
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:43 pm to tgrbaitn08
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/1/20 at 10:35 am
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:45 pm to dixiechick
quote:
conservatives/ Republicans
I'm conservative as can be, and can't stand "school vouchers"..
From your own link...
quote:
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was passed initially by Congress in 1965 to authorize programs to benefit educationally needy elementary and secondary students living in areas with high concentrations of children from low-income families. With each reauthorization, it is renamed. Currently it is known as the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015.
In 1965 the democratic party controlled the House and Senate by 65%...
This post was edited on 8/21/18 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:45 pm to dixiechick
quote:
Yes that was my point.
and you're wrong.....just because a school receives public funds doesnt meant they can make their own rules.....
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:46 pm to dixiechick
A huge percentage of parochial schools get federal funding of some sort, usually through the federal meals program. If what you are saying is correct (it isn't) then these schools would actually not even be allowed to be parochial schools. They would not be allowed to even teach religion. Think about what you are suggesting. It is not even logical.
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:52 pm to dixiechick
So you're wrong now until maybe you're right one day down the road
Ha
Ha
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:57 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/1/20 at 10:34 am
Posted on 8/21/18 at 12:59 pm to tigersownall
quote:
LaToya Black I got suspended in 7th grade for putting gum in the white girls real hair that she kept flinging over my desk and in my face.......I wonder if she liked her forced hair cut
lol
Posted on 8/21/18 at 1:00 pm to dixiechick
quote:
s we are witnessing many catholic schools converting to non religious charter schools. Lots of literature out there about this.
Where...? Not here in New Orleans...
Link..?
Popular
Back to top



1




