re: Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist is proud to harass families of children who were killed

quote:

---

Tsk tsk tsk, the board isn't going to like you saying you don't know, there isn't enough truth to make a sound conclusion. That's whacko, leftist, conspiracy kook, mumbo jumbo.


Did I do it right?

---

Sandy Hook is very straightforward with a lot of publicly-available evidence. For a CT, it's boring and morphing it into a larger plot makes no sense.

The Vegas shooting is not straightforward, has a much more censored amount of publicly-available information, and has so many questions it is naturally open to craft larger plots around it.

Like I said earlier, Sandy Hook truthers are completely irrational. If they want CTs, there are much better ones to devote personal resources towards.

quote:

---

His #1 alternative, non-mainstream explanation for Sandy Hook was pedophilia. So he's answered, but not well.

---

No he hasn’t, at all.

The questions are:

Does he think Adam Lanza killed 20 kids at Sandy Hook?

What specific facts as presented by the media or government regarding Sandy Hook does he think are suspicious or worthy of scrutiny?


He hasn’t directly answered either question.

quote:

---

His (allegedly) missing hard drive

The FBI officially finding no motive

I think he had basically no online presence, pictures, references etc. immediately after the shooting.

---

I mean a crazy right-wing conspiracist destroying his harddrive before committing his act isnt exactly super compelling evidence of larger conspiracy, or foul play. Same goes for lack of clear motive(though there is unsealed documents suggesting some influencing factors LINK

He's a more unique case for sure, but nothing that rises to the level of credible evidence of outside influence or conspiracy.

quote:

---

I have a few questions.

---

Oh how convenient.

quote:

---

Weren't some of the families not allowed to see the bodies because they were too gruesome? Weren't some of the burials closed casket for the same reason?

---

Yes to both, as is, has, and always will be the case. The families were not allowed to see the bodies AT THE SCENE because of the nature of what occurred there. Again, completely and 100% standard practice.

Closed casket funerals for the same reason.

Please link any information you find that families were prevented from ever viewing the bodies and NOT just prevented from viewing them at the scene.

quote:

---

Again, you simple fricks provide links from 2014 inwhich hardly any of those posters are still here.

---

Well that’s the time when sandy hook would more likely to be discussed

You could make an argument that politalk far more sane back then too because they didn’t have a guy to rally behind and weren’t complete wing cucks

Hopefully she will get murdered.

quote:

---

Could have been one or a combination of any motives.

1. Pedophilia - Were some (or all) of these kids killed, or were they kidnapped? Pedophilia is too big to fail in this country. Were the bodies replaced with others? It's been quite a while since the event, but I seem to recall something about some of the parents weren't allowed to see the bodies because they were too "messy" to view. I also recall some were closed casket funerals for the same reason.
I almost hope these kids were killed, because the alternative would be unthinkable.

2. Human sacrifice - These are sick, sick phuks we're talking about.

3. Some sort of initiation - Like regular street gangs, killing to enter the gang or club, whatever.

4. Gun control - We are being incrementally led to that ending. That's why these types of things will continue, until enough people willingly hand them over. It will happen eventually, but not for many more years and many more events such as these.

5. Who knows? We're talking about people powerful enough to skirt the law. In that scenario, anything goes.

---

While you probably wrote this just to ring peoples bells you are one sick frick for even thinking most of what you wrote.

quote:

---

it’s so much more than that. Liberator is apparently of the mind that ships in 1840 were not capable of transporting goods or traveling 1500 miles. It really is incredible.

---

I am still amused at how triggering the subject of Fort Jefferson (and Star Forts) was and still obviously is for many. AND...here you are, STILL affected and referring to it (but on THIS thread?? )

Since it is YOU who wanted badly to beat this dead horse again:

"Transporting" goods 1500 miles is NOT the obvious problem. You conveniently ignored the what & how that's claimed to have been "transported":

A mind-boggling 16 MILLION bricks. Transported 1500 miles. ON vessels like THIS:



Indefatigable: "Meh. No Problem!!"

16 MILLION bricks is still documented to be THE most bricks of any structure on earth.

So...shipped 1500 miles from a supposed brick-maker all the way in Maine, eh? (ZERO docs) To a Dry Tortugas, way in the Gulf of Mexico? (ZERO docs) To Fort Jefferson we are told was built in the 1840s-1850s? (ZERO docs) Recorded shipping docs, details, engineering/witness accounts and logistics? (ZERO)

To actually believe this entire ridiculous "official" "historical" drivel on face value requires an incredibly high level of blind faith and trust in hearsay sources. Especially given there's ZERO documentation

Please address your LACK OF providing shipping accounts, documentation & details of the alleged "transport" of 16 million bricks to Fort Jefferson, FL in the "history" books, I'm all ears and eyes. (nevermind the sheer impossibility of the overall engineering feat & logistics for that time in History).







So. 16 million bricks. Maine to HERE. Other than, "muh-Wiki", got any docs for us?

quote:

---

the acceptance of Sandy Hook is fake is massively accepted by the PB” is straight up horse shite.

---

quote:

---

What is your opinion on why some people get so angry if you can't reproduce the original conspiracy documents and tell them what color underwear was worn at the time (with pics, I might add)?

I think it just shows the desperation for wanting to believe that people are inherently good and that bad people don't do bad things. A sort of defense mechanism.

---

You're pretty much spot on.

No one wants to admit they've been wrong. OR fooled. The whole, "DOCUMENT IT!!" is just theatrics. The True-Believers don't really want to see any documentation. It might actually change their mind about everything.

There is indeed a desperation especially to believe the people who comprise goobermint -- especially in our historical America -- has always a benevolent overlord. Is there some merit to it? Yes. (while it was more "Christian" and less Secular-Humanist). But... overall? The truth of the matter of the past AND present is far sinister than most are willing to concede.

It's already been stated but a very real Stockholm Syndrome of sorts has already taken place for the majority of the American people; Our early "education" has actually been more indoctrination, obedience training & programming than anything else. It's bore fruit in the willing blind faith and illusion of govt as benevolent & honest broker we see here in this thread (along with the irrational anger for daring to go off the Plantation and disbelieve tNarrative.)