Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Replacing asphalt impregnated sheathing from the inside

Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:53 am
Posted by TigerRagAndrew
Check my style out
Member since Aug 2004
7216 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:53 am
Anyone dealt with this in their flood repair yet?

Apparently there is some method where the boards are cut 16" on center to fit behind the studs and attached with furring strips to the brick via toggle bolts and having the edges sealed with expanding foam. It was devised by the insurance companies to avoid paying for a correct repair lol.
Posted by drewnbrla
The Pool is closed.
Member since Mar 2011
7839 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:58 am to
quote:

asphalt impregnated sheathing from the inside


Yep, that's how all pregnancies begin.
Posted by madamsquirrel
The Snarlington Estate
Member since Jul 2009
48273 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:07 am to
My insurance company only wants to pay for this. Any suggestions on getting them to pay for the correct method also?
Or contractors recommendations on not removing it?
Posted by AndyCBR
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2012
7540 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:25 am to
A few people I know in this situation tore out the blackboard totally and had closed cell foam sprayed on the backside of the brick to fill the cavity. It's a good idea to add some corner bracing of some type also if there is none. Closed cell is critical so the moisture that gets through the brick doesn't migrate.

Not an ideal repair but short of removing the brick veneer and resheathing there is no good way to do it from the inside and maintain any type of drain cavity behind the brick.
Posted by Eric Stratton
Faber College
Member since Mar 2015
2049 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:28 am to
Well maybe the asphalt and sheathing really loved each other, you have no right to determine who impregnates who.... love wants what love wants.

Posted by TigerRagAndrew
Check my style out
Member since Aug 2004
7216 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:34 am to
A link I saw said using closed cell foam would yield freeze crack damage on the brickwork.
Posted by WeeBeaux
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
698 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:40 am to
Seems like a bad idea to me.

You are reducing the cavity wall depth (should be minimum 1"), thereby reducing the ability of the air space to ventilate and drain any moisture. Second, the general idea of any sheathing / weather barrier is to form a continuous barrier to guard against moisture. Having a seam every 16" (even if it is sealed with foam) is asking for leaks to occur.

But I have had a contractor tell me this method was used in houses that were flooded in Katrina.
Posted by weadjust
Member since Aug 2012
15080 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Closed cell is critical so the moisture that gets through the brick doesn't migrate.


quote:

maintain any type of drain cavity behind the brick.


How does the moisture make it's way down to the weep holes to drain with the closed cell foam applied directly to the birck?

Posted by Negative Nomad
Hell
Member since Oct 2011
3173 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 11:09 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 4:22 pm
Posted by phil good
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
1538 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 12:16 pm to
I'd like to know what the contractor documented. I'm dealing with the same thing
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram