- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Racist whites don't want low income section 8 coming to their neighborhood
Posted on 4/25/17 at 8:44 pm to Loungefly85
Posted on 4/25/17 at 8:44 pm to Loungefly85
Oh sure. Not wanting ones property values to go down is so racist.
Get a fricking grip.
Get a fricking grip.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 9:06 pm to Loungefly85
They have been begging for new NBR developments. Finally they get something!! What does that dumb bitch want, $700K homes???
This development is needed and there is a huge demand for it in NBR.
Hopefully it happens soon!
This development is needed and there is a huge demand for it in NBR.
Hopefully it happens soon!
Posted on 4/25/17 at 9:32 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Then why does she demand that every nice development have section 8?
That's what I'm saying. Time for it to finally be in her backyard.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 9:37 pm to Loungefly85
No one wants that shite nearby.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 9:38 pm to tke857
I think she's right. 400 units would be very big and dense. It's going to be a major problem shortly after it opens.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 9:40 pm to Supermoto Tiger
quote:
This development is needed and there is a huge demand for it in NBR
It must be pretty awesome to be so naive that you think a massive block of government housing is what any area "needs"
Posted on 4/25/17 at 9:44 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
StongSaftey
Please ban yourself and so is all a favor.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 9:51 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
It must be pretty awesome to be so naive that you think a massive block of government housing is what any area "needs"
It's time for these developments to get underway in NBR -- instead of SBR. And, you are so naive it that you can't see how that would improve your quality of life.
The question should be: Why is it ok for sec 8 to be allowed in our communities, BUT NOT in S. Banks community??
I fricking HATE sec 8. But, it's time for these developments to go vertical in the communities of some of these councilwomen's hoods.
This post was edited on 4/25/17 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 4/25/17 at 9:52 pm to Tempratt
Section 8 is a destroyer of neighborhoods. Happens about 99% of the time. Yet liberals insist it's just great hard working people who care for the properties and any opposition is automatically racist.
I got into a discussion recently about it with other people in my neighborhood. I live in a quiet HOA suburb well away from any trash. Unbelievable how some neighbors thought our area NEEDED "affordable housing" and wouldn't admit that affordable housing is a euphemism for Sec 8. When I suggested they go check out rental properties in some of the run down areas of the city with plentiful affordable housing, well I was being ridiculous and racist.
I got into a discussion recently about it with other people in my neighborhood. I live in a quiet HOA suburb well away from any trash. Unbelievable how some neighbors thought our area NEEDED "affordable housing" and wouldn't admit that affordable housing is a euphemism for Sec 8. When I suggested they go check out rental properties in some of the run down areas of the city with plentiful affordable housing, well I was being ridiculous and racist.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 9:59 pm to goofball
quote:
I think she's right. 400 units would be very big and dense. It's going to be a major problem shortly after it opens.
Yet, not only would she be ok with it being in south BR, she'd encourage it and scream RACIST after any and all who oppose it.
This post was edited on 4/25/17 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 4/25/17 at 11:30 pm to NickyT
Sooo Chauna approved it in November but now that the developer isn't "playing ball" in her district and sliding money under the table to her she is opposing it? Is it just me or does that how the WAFB article makes it appear?
Posted on 4/25/17 at 11:34 pm to Loungefly85
quote:
Yet, not only would she be ok with it being in south BR, she'd encourage it and scream RACIST after any and all who oppose it.
She definitely would. They should build 800 units as close to her backyard as possible.
Posted on 4/26/17 at 7:44 pm to biglego
quote:
well I was being ridiculous and racist
Some of your neighbors are idiots.
Posted on 4/26/17 at 8:41 pm to dewster
I just found this gem from one of her constituents.


This post was edited on 4/26/17 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 4/26/17 at 8:55 pm to rowbear1922
quote:
Sooo Chauna approved it in November but now that the developer isn't "playing ball" in her district and sliding money under the table to her she is opposing it? Is it just me or does that how the WAFB article makes it appear?
Sounds like it
quote:
Wicker said the development was approved unanimously by the EBR metro council back in November and also given the green light by the Planning Commission.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 1:09 pm to upgrayedd
I just read that this 380 unit development is primarily for low income senior citizens.
I guess they didn't produce enough kickbacks?
I guess they didn't produce enough kickbacks?
Posted on 4/27/17 at 1:50 pm to goofball
Not only did she mention that there are no schools around this "senior development", she also mentioned this was a "food desert" when there is literally a Shoppers Choice grocery store less than a mile from the development.
Banks has no idea what she is talking about or doing. Too bad her constituency wont realize this. I'm sure she will be trolling around the House halls in two years.
I really feel bad for that developer. It seems to me he followed the rules, and is getting screwed over by these elected officials. Really makes people want to build up legitimate businesses and developments in NBR, doesn't it?
Banks has no idea what she is talking about or doing. Too bad her constituency wont realize this. I'm sure she will be trolling around the House halls in two years.
I really feel bad for that developer. It seems to me he followed the rules, and is getting screwed over by these elected officials. Really makes people want to build up legitimate businesses and developments in NBR, doesn't it?
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 4/27/17 at 2:24 pm to TigerRob20
why in the frick would want your property devalued
Popular
Back to top



1










