Started By
Message

re: Placing blame on inanimate objects versus getting to the root of the problem

Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:06 am to
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
76272 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:06 am to
quote:

TH03


You are all over the place. Quit arguing to argue. SOMETIMES sheer logic and intuitive thought are better than graphs and studies.

Yes or no, do you think that these types of video games have zero negative effects on impressionable minds?
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49833 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:07 am to
Fun fact: these are, for all intents and purposes, the exact same gun. Yet people are arguing that one of these should be banned or restricted

>

This post was edited on 2/15/18 at 10:10 am
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35765 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:08 am to
I'm sure it's been said already and I'm not reading this entire thread, but did it occur to anyone that the solution doesn't have to be completely "restrict guns" or "blame the individual/society/parents/drugs"? It can be approached from both sides to get to a point where these mass killings are not so rampant.

And also, why white people gotta be shooting everyone. FFS.
Posted by Geauxboy
NW Arkansas
Member since Oct 2006
4856 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:09 am to
Dude.....well put. I love you (no homo)
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171952 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Yes or no, do you think that these types of video games have zero negative effects on impressionable minds?


They have zero effect. Do you know how many copies these games sell? If they had the effect y'all think they have, we'd have 10 school shootings a day. The latest call of duty has sold 10 million copies.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Should drugs be legal then as well? What about speeding in your car? Should prescription drugs be regulated?


Yes, I think narcotics should be legal and regulates.

I think speed limits don’t really do anything other than create another revenue for police. But I see the necessity in some ways.

Yes, all drugs should be legal.

quote:

If freedom extends to someone owning weapons that make it extremely easy to kill someone, why not extend other freedoms as well?


I’m fine with extending other freedoms as long as they don’t take away from my own.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:12 am to
quote:

This gets brought up all the time, but self preservation from what? Other people with guns? The police? A military take over?


Yes
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14910 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Very few people take accountability for their actions; it's always the fault of someone/something else

I know for a fact that it's my golf ball's fault. Or possibly the clubs.
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
76272 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:14 am to
Two questions for you.

- Do you think it is visually prejudicial that the top rifle has no magazine in place?

- How easily can the top rifle be converted to auto-fire?
Posted by ToesOnTheNose213
The present
Member since Oct 2007
2028 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Hey fruitcake. Get over yourself and your hurt feelings.



Excellent argument. You've shown your extensive reasoning on the subject and thoroughly convinced me and undoubtedly persuaded many others. Well done.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35765 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Yes, all drugs should be legal.


Yikes. You need to watch a few episodes of intervention. With them illegal we still have an opioid crisis of epic proportions. I shudder to think what would happen if they were legal.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
69470 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:18 am to
quote:

We never had these problems before we started prescribing so called happy pills that detach you from human feelings to everyone who has bad days. 


LOL
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171952 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:19 am to
quote:

With them illegal we still have an opioid crisis of epic proportions. I shudder to think what would happen if they were legal.



Opiod crisis isn't the fault of having drugs be illegal.
Posted by Ice Cold
Over Macho Grande
Member since Jun 2004
18868 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:20 am to
quote:

No, it's about self sufficiency and NOT being dependent on the police and government for my personal safety.

Oh, I thought you might have been concerned with the actual language in the Constitution. My bad.
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49833 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:20 am to
quote:

- Do you think it is visually prejudicial that the top rifle has no magazine in place?

That's what I'm getting at. People fear and argue things that they don't have a clue about

Neither the gun nor the magazine are dangerous w/o a deranged person operating them
Posted by GeauxOCDP
Member since Jul 2015
1050 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:21 am to
quote:

So his dad had a temper problem and rather than just explain why he should and shouldn't act a certain way, he uses aggression and anger to parent him? 

Can anyone else see why this is a problem? You want to lower violence in children by teaching them that lashing out with aggression when angry, is an acceptable behavior? 
That is a learned behavior, it breeds the acceptance of violent behavior through generations...



This is what's wrong with the world today. People actually think like this.


You mean actually using our brains to form complete and logical thought processes?
This is common sense for anyone familiar with child psychology.
Posted by Ice Cold
Over Macho Grande
Member since Jun 2004
18868 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:21 am to
quote:

not at all what they meant

Oh, we're trying to interpret what the authors of the Second Amendment meant? Or are we just concerned about the words themselves? I can't keep up with the rationalizations.
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20543 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:21 am to
quote:

thoroughly convinced me and undoubtedly persuaded many others
The difference between you and me, is approach. I don't comment on this board with that in mind. We're all just a bunch of dudes commenting on shite on this board. I'm not looking to be a teacher.

How incredibly narcissistic of you.
Posted by Ice Cold
Over Macho Grande
Member since Jun 2004
18868 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:22 am to
quote:

The US Supreme Court disagrees with your interpretation.

I'm not "interpreting" anything. I'm suggesting that if he's scared of the feds, he should take action and join a "well-regulated militia."
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
76272 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:22 am to
quote:

They have zero effect


You don't KNOW that. It is your impression, just as it is mine that they do have some effect.

quote:

they had the effect y'all think they have, we'd have 10 school shootings a day.


You don't know what effect I think they have but regardless, millions smoke cigarettes and not all get cancer so cigs are ok?
This post was edited on 2/15/18 at 10:24 am
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram